User talk:Epastore

Welcome!

Hello, Epastore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jacoplane 22:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Word origins on disambiguation pages

Hello Epastore, Your addition to Matrix regarding the word derivations was very informative, however, since Matrix is a disambiguation page, it does not belong there, and I wanted to let you know why I removed it. Disambiguation pages are used to direct people to different articles when there are multiple uses for a word. Except in rare cases, only the links to the different articles are included. The Manual of style for disambiguation pages dicates the style of disambiguation pages. While your word origin information was certainly informative, it is along the lines of something that would belong in a dictionary, and remember, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. However, consider adding your information to Wiktionary, where I am sure it would be most welcome. -- Natalya 19:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Pseudoscience

Thank you for your efforts with Template:Infobox Pseudoscience. However, some of the formatting you tidied up was deliberate (lists didn't display correctly otherwise). I've restored the parts that were needed, while keeping the other parts that you'd changed that didn't interfere with rendering of the infobox. Further information is at Template talk:Infobox Pseudoscience.

Happy editing! --Christopher Thomas 20:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

FleaCircus Review

Dear Epastore, thanks for reviewing the flea circus page, can you clarify which paragraphs specifically you believe are confusing and I'll look at revising them. Regards, Andy www.fleacircus.co.uk

Updated the flea circus page --Flea Circus Director 14:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

what a few edits can do

Cephalopod intelligence no longer reads like a middle-school essay. Thank you. — coelacan talk — 06:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Invite to Nursing wikiproject

Hello, this is an invitation to join WikiProject Nursing.

Thank you for editing the article Nursing home.

You may be interested in joining WikiProject Nursing. This WikiProject aims to improve the standard of all aritcles relating to Nursing, which includes articles which directly relate to the Nursing profession, including its history, the duties and activities of nurses, their role in the general field of medicine, and all related articles.

You can help by:

• Creating new articles.
• Expanding stubs.
• Adding photographs.
• Referencing articles.
• Research topics.
• Anything else really...

For more information, see the project page, and if you have any questions you can leave them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nursing and someone will get back to you.

— Rod ^talk 21:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

OS X

We've already gone through this as per Talk:OS X. When more information is available, editors will decide on what to do with the page. Right now, more editors want it to be a simple redirect, so we should feel lucky it's even a disambig page. Roguegeek (talk) 02:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

You have already gone through this... but your edits are incorrect. In what way does a page from the manufacturer not constitute an official source?

AfD nomination of Snorkeling locations

I have nominated Snorkeling locations, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snorkeling locations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Aquatic ape hypothesis

Please note the discussion here. WLU (talk) 17:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Milk - emulsion or colloid

I'd like to discuss your edit changing the classification of milk to a sol colloid from an emulsion. Milk fat is a solid or a liquid, depending on the temperature. At the body temperature of a cow, milk fat is probably a liquid, or at least somewhere inbetween a liquid and a solid. Try leaving butter in your cupboard during a summer heat-wave! It is more solid at room and refridgerated temperatures. Not sure if this qualifies it as a sol colloid or not, but I don't believe the definition of an emulsion is contingent on it's physical state (e.g. liquid). Perhaps it fits both classifications, there is no reason that it couldn't, but it would depend on the temperature! Maybe the article should be written to reflect this, but some citations are necessary to back this up. I'm sure few people would disagree on the status of milk as an emulsion, and it is also a colloid. Here are some references in support of the definition of milk as an emulsion:

http://www.foodsci.uoguelph.ca/dairyedu/chem.html#lipids1

http://animsci.agrenv.mcgill.ca/courses/450/topics/2.html

http://classes.ansci.uiuc.edu/ansc438/Milkcompsynth/milkcomp_physicochem.html

http://www.nutrition.org.uk/home.asp?siteId=43&sectionId=427&parentSection=322&which=

http://books.google.ca/books?id=6Q8mX8DsDe4C&pg=PA104&lpg=PA104&dq=milk+emulsion&source=web&ots=kwFLmPM4zY&sig=FCFoffUs68vn4u0LX8agBu745ng&hl=en

I am changing it back to being called an emulsion, but adding that it can also be referred to as a colloid. If you want to add the sol definition, perhaps we need a little more than the sol colloid stub with no references to back this up.

Cheers, Halogenated (talk) 02:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

That works for me... I just wanted to resolve the difference in articles. I've updated Colloid to match. — Epastore (talk) 02:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Boy, it would have been nice if some of this discussion had been placed in the colloid page. I just editted it back to sol, and now find this discussion here. Sigh. The discussion of butter is interesting, because of course the colloid page is quite comfortable calling it a gel, despite it being an emulsion at the same temperatures at which milk is an emulsion.

Perhaps the wise thing is to remove dairy products from the illustrative table; surely the table is meant to inform and not to include confusing edge cases. - 63.107.91.99 (talk) 19:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ascpfoundation.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation

I have nominated American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Fallen Angel 00:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation

A tag has been placed on American Society of Consultant Pharmacists Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:R. Tim Webster.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:R. Tim Webster.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

epicaricacy

I was looking for the word epicaricacy, only to find it had been deleted. I'd like to put in a definition for the word, my workup is here: wikt:User:Evrik/epicaricacy. I found the archived deletion discussion. As you were a participant in the delete discussion, do you mind giving my work a review? --evrik ^(talk) 18:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adriel Hampton

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Adriel Hampton, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

does not meet WP:POLITICIAN, announcing candidacy on Twitter is at best one event only

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Crusio (talk) 14:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of pharmacy associations

I have nominated List of pharmacy associations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of pharmacy associations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 06:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

wikiproject iphone OS

Just thought you might be interested

Wikipedia ads	file info – #177

ISmashed TALK! 18:13, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Surgeon General of the United States

42 U.S.C. § 207 of the U.S. Code specifically says, [t]he Surgeon General, during the period of [her] appointment as such, shall be of the same grade (O-9) as the Surgeon General of the Army. That means Regina Benjamin has to be commissioned into the United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps which is why every Surgeon General since C. Everett Koop, with the exception of David Satcher who was a four-star admiral, has been commissioned as a vice admiral. Neovu79 (talk) 05:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Concerning Redirection of Giant Beaver

I think it would be a much better idea to make Giant Beaver a redirect to the page Castoroides, which is the genus of giant beavers.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:24, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

I think a certain saying concerning a certain rodent would apply... Although I can't remember whether it was about beavers or woodchucks. Maybe degus.--Mr Fink (talk) 02:39, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of ecovillages

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of ecovillages. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ecovillages. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ExploreLearning

A tag has been placed on ExploreLearning requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WackyWace ^talk 17:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cambium Learning Technologies

A tag has been placed on Cambium Learning Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WackyWace ^talk 17:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of ExploreLearning

I have nominated ExploreLearning, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ExploreLearning. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. UtherSRG (talk) 09:11, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Research Systems Unix Group

Hello, Epastore, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research Systems Unix Group whether the article Research Systems Unix Group should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Research Systems Unix Group, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Bbb23 (talk) 16:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

cooperation with SDJournal

Hello Epastore,

I'm from SD Journal (http://en.sdjournal.org/) and i have proposition for you. Would you be interested in promoting your name on our pages? We're offering you cooperation with SD Journal, I mean we want you to write for us!

Our next issue will be "Mobile Development" - namely, iPhone and iOS Programming. And I see that you have essential knowledge to share with our readers (50 000 of them from all over the world). So why not to try?

If you'll show as our expert, we will offer you possibility of free advertisment of your page/company, publication in our famous magazine - SD Journal and possibility of longer cooperation (which means for example free, one year subscription!)

What do we want? An article of your own concept connected with the subject (iPhone and iOS programming). It may be tutorial, article, DiY, photostory? etc. As I wrote before - the concept is yours. The more interesting, the better :)

You don't need to worry if for example you're not the best writer etc. We have team who will elaborate your article. The bigest value for us is your knowledge!

I will gladly answer any question you have. So please let me know as fast as you can if you're interested in contributing and then I'll give you the details.

Cheers Mateusz Szymanski Editor of SDJournal mateusz.szymanski@software.com.pl — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.205.207.70 (talk) 16:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Holowynge listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Holowynge. Since you had some involvement with the Holowynge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 15:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Epastore. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Epastore. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

February 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Moringa oleifera, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. We don't cite in vitro research to support medical content. Please review WP:MEDHOW. Zefr (talk) 19:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

@Zefr: I don't understand why this message applies. I am using the already-cited secondary source which thoroughly cites primary sources in its summary. Granted, it should be re-written a little; but the article should not be reverted. The old version is patently false, as it uses 2014-2015 articles to claim that there is no research. That is no longer true in 2019. —Epastore (talk) 22:03, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

You said: "In vitro and animal studies indicate that the leaf, seed, and root extracts of moringa oleifera have anticancer, hepatoprotective, hypoglycemic, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and antisickling effects. They may also protect against Alzheimer’s disease and stomach ulcers, help lower cholesterol levels, promote wound healing, and alleviate symptoms of ulcerative colitis." This statement is promotional spam, going from primary lab findings to suggesting moringa has a wide range of clinical effects, none of which comes close to being proven. WP:MEDRS requires high-quality reviews, which are not available. The MSKCC source, "For Healthcare Professions", says: "Clinical data are limited, but preliminary findings show that MO exerts a small positive effect on lipid profiles. An MO leaf powder increased insulin secretion in healthy subjects, and improved nutritional status and intake of AIDS patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy." All of this is preliminary, non-MEDRS material, and has no place in the article. Bottom line: there should be no inference of positive effect of moringa, and the MSKCC source is only usable for sourcing potential adverse effects. --Zefr (talk) 23:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

@Zefr: Ah, gotchya. Okay; I accept the revert, but am changing the wording I originally had an issue with. Inefficacy can be over-claimed as much as can efficacy. —Epastore (talk) 23:45, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Research Systems Unix Group

Hello, Epastore. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Research Systems Unix Group.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of William Newnam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Newnam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Newnam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 18:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sidegrade

The article Sidegrade has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

'Delete.' Completely unreferenced; WP:BEFORE reveals no sources covering this term in sufficient detail required by WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:59, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

February 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rolfing; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 19:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

@Alexbrn: I made one revert to the text. You made three identical reverts, contradicting two users who gave well-reasoned explanations. Please do not send warnings frivolously. I appreciate that you are attempting to defend the principles of science; but I was simply correcting an unsubstantiated conclusion. To do otherwise would be unscientific. :) Please refer to my new section on Talk:Rolfing.

Hi there! This is to do nothing more than to make you aware of the policy (in case you didn't know!). Alexbrn (talk) 18:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

@Alexbrn: Thanks for the kind reply. I hope we can work through this misunderstanding. :) Epastore (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Courtesy notice - General sanctions apply to fringe science topics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Hipal (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Alexbrn (talk) 20:23, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@Alexbrn: Another user posted this notice on my talk page less than twelve months ago, so your post is in violation of the usage rules of T:DSA.

Wrong. Please be sure to read the notice carefully. Alexbrn (talk) 04:55, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)