Jump to content

Talk:Faizabad Junction railway station/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Requested move 25 October 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved The nominator is blocked as sockpuppet. Venkat TL (talk) 17:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


Faizabad Junction railway stationAyodhya Cantt railway stationWP:COMMONNAME, proposed title has almost double result with quotes on google. Yes I am aware of this notice, but I think it applies to only city and district name because airport's page name is changed in past see Ayodhya Airport. JaiHind108 (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Oppose @JaiHind108, The source never says it is the official name. As of now it is the name proposed by the CM on a tweet. Once Railway board approves and the station board are changed with new painted name, then we can call it official. Not now. A mention of announcement is already added. A rename of article is premature. Venkat TL (talk) 18:17, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
@Venkat TL I think you haven't read WP:COMMONNAME, it talks about common name, not official name. first of all it is official, yesterday i personally went to somewhere i saw trains for Ayodhya cantt not Faizabad junction, i know it doesn't count, but still, secondly if it is not official even then this discussion is about WP:COMMONNAME not official name. JaiHind108 (talk) 18:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
@JaiHind108, Please present your evidence that this is the common name. My searches say Faizabad is the common name still. Venkat TL (talk) 18:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
@Venkat TL, Searching "faizabad junction" with quotes gave me 70,900 results while "ayodhya cantt" shows 164,000 result, i dont know how to send screen shot, otherwise i would have shown you. JaiHind108 (talk) 18:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
@Oculi please check my User contributions for JaiHind108 and check if i have done any edit except this to change "faizabad" to "ayodhya". One more thing, let us suppose for second that i have interest in changing "faizabad" to "ayodhya" but i dont think this can be the reason to oppose this RM, if you agree with my given arguments above then support this move, if not then please specify reason and then oppose, and last thing that i have similar same with some blocked user, so what, what do you want to say, please be a little more clear/specific??? thank you JaiHind108 (talk) 04:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
@JaiHind108 so what? So if you are a blocked user then you are not allowed to edit. This thread will then be pointless and be removed without any consequence. Venkat TL (talk) 08:10, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
@Venkat TL see, if i would be that user why would i use similar name? to get caught?? still you are free to open a sockpuppet investigation against me, if you think that, i can't stop you, go ahead and get your answer!! JaiHind108 (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Very upsetting to see a user using JaiHind as name and then lying and using unethical means. Please check. Venkat TL (talk) 08:30, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Venkat TL you have no right to do personal attacks on any user, if you have doubts then go by procedure, dont attack me on my username. JaiHind108 (talk) 10:08, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
wow, amazing, Oculi had doubt that i am Hindu108 who is a suspected sockpuppet of Sanjaykumartiwari, and Mr. Venkat TL you have started investigation against me of being some other, User:Dusrapehelu, why dont you all seat and decide and then finalize one name, whom i am sockpuppet of?? JaiHind108 (talk) 10:25, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.