Talk:Fake news

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fake news article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4: 90 days

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Fake news. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Fake news at the Reference desk.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

snow keep, 20 August 2018, see discussion.
merge and redirect to News management, 12 April 2005, see discussion.

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet High‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Fake news by country was copied or moved into Fake news with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Section sizes

Section size for Fake news (94 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	6,687	6,687
Defining fake news	9,621	22,324
Roots	2,434	2,434
Popularity and viral spread	4,395	4,395
Its damaging effects	5,874	5,874
Types of fake news	1,902	1,902
Criticism of the term	5,436	5,436
Identification	4,069	6,398
Online identification	2,329	2,329
Tackling and suppression strategies	1,749	40,938
Strategies regarding the perpetrator	45	6,048
Promotion of facts over emotions	1,802	1,802
Technique rebuttal	1,053	1,053
Individual counteraction	1,790	1,790
Backfire effect	1,358	1,358
Strategies regarding carriers	38	22,035
Regulation of social media	1,787	1,787
General strategy	2,898	2,898
Fact-checking	2,286	2,286
Facebook	2,550	2,550
Google	1,880	1,880
Legal and criminal sanctions in general	10,596	10,596
Strategies regarding the recipient	42	11,106
Cognitive biases of recipient	2,059	2,059
Nudges as reflection prompts	2,518	2,518
Media critical thinking skills	493	493
Mental immune health, inoculation and prebunking	5,994	5,994
History	14	34,731
Ancient	3,888	3,888
Medieval	878	878
Early modern	3,108	3,108
19th century	3,799	3,799
20th century	7,483	7,483
21st century	15,561	15,561
Special topics	22	26,844
Deepfakes and shallowfakes	6,065	6,065
Bots on social media	9,749	9,749
Internet trolls	3,688	3,688
Fake news hoaxes	7,320	7,320
Donald Trump and hoax news	11,785	11,785
By country	17	129,936
Europe	15	42,048
Austria	1,077	1,077
Belgium	941	941
Czech Republic	1,833	1,833
European Union	932	932
Finland	1,219	1,219
France	5,491	5,491
Germany	5,709	5,709
Hungary	1,153	1,153
Italy	2,043	2,043
Netherlands	1,356	1,356
Poland	2,164	2,164
Romania	750	750
Russia	3,252	3,252
Serbia	4,023	4,023
Spain	1,941	1,941
Sweden	1,660	1,660
Ukraine	2,575	2,575
United Kingdom	3,914	3,914
Asia	13	40,889
China	5,025	5,025
Hong Kong, China	2,398	2,398
India	1,064	1,064
Indonesia	7,493	7,493
Malaysia	3,584	3,584
Myanmar (Burma)	1,230	1,230
Pakistan	1,022	1,022
Philippines	6,779	6,779
Singapore	8,639	8,639
South Korea	1,669	1,669
Taiwan	1,973	1,973
Americas	18	25,904
Brazil	7,368	7,368
Canada	1,515	1,515
Colombia	4,486	4,486
Mexico	12,380	12,380
United States	137	137
Middle East and Africa	31	18,613
Armenia	961	961
Israel and Palestinian territories	5,091	5,091
Saudi Arabia	3,554	3,554
Syria	3,622	3,622
United Arab Emirates	868	868
Egypt	846	846
South Africa	3,640	3,640
Oceania	17	2,465
Australia	2,448	2,448
See also	1,828	1,828
Notes	26	26
References	30	446
Sources	416	416
Further reading	4,070	4,070
External links	3,343	3,343
Total	296,694	296,694

Daily pageviews of this article

Last six months (log scale)

Last 30 days (linear scale)

Use of AI as fake news as a potential subtopic?[edit]

I've noticed that the article lacks most mention of any sort of use of AI used to create fake news. The article itself occasionally mentions using AI to counter it, but not to using AI to create fake news, other than briefly when talking about fake news in Mexico. Should a subtopic be made dedicated to AI creating fake news, or should it be placed in a different section? DroopyB (talk) 14:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any sources discussing this as a wide issue? Slatersteven (talk) 14:17, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What's considered a "wide issue"? I have sources on AI misinformation and AI being used as fake news, but none of them directly call the issue a "wide" issue. DroopyB (talk) 14:35, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean is, does this violate [p[wplundue]], what major RS has taken notice of this as an issue? Slatersteven (talk) 14:40, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What does it mean to "violate [p[wplundue]]"? Stevesuny (talk) 18:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Typo, its meant to be a link to wp:undue or "demonstrate this is anything more than a narrow or finge view that is highly relevant to the topic". Slatersteven (talk) 18:15, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is this recent academic article which discusses this topic critically and cites a lot of material on the subject: https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/misinformation-reloaded-fears-about-the-impact-of-generative-ai-on-misinformation-are-overblown/ AcademiaObscura (talk) 13:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting... ''Flux55'' (talk) 16:57, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made an account just to say this page needs work[edit]

Hello Wikipedia, normally your pages are easy to read. This one is very long and has no table of contents or way to easily navigate it. Sorry I can't help. HeretoCriticize (talk) 21:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The History section is missing the Cold War entirely...[edit]

...and should be expanded. JackTheSecond (talk) 23:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any ideas what should be added?--Jack Upland (talk) 23:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on the German Service of the BBC for a while and got the impression that the BBC was broadcasting much more reliable news segments than really anyone else. By my impression, Radio propaganda seems to have been a major facet of the Cold War and the truthfulness of the various broadcasts seems to have varied by a lot.

But maybe general propaganda is outside the scope of this article. I don't really know. JackTheSecond (talk) 11:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would say it is, its why we have a whole article on it. Slatersteven (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's more the amount of additional information that covering the Cold War as well that'd be a problem, probably. Though, because of how the definition at the top does include 'propaganda', maybe we can add a section and include a link to the relevant articles. JackTheSecond (talk) 12:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"the House of Commons commenced an inquiry"[edit]

... and then what? Did anything come of it? What's the point of mentioning it? WP:NOTNEWS. 2601:642:4600:D3B0:56C:3F16:53EF:5265 (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The quoted section is not in the article. Neither are similar statements. JackTheSecond (talk) 12:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]