Talk:Fallout 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleFallout 3 has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 28, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
August 21, 2011Good article nomineeListed
September 6, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article


Plot contradiction[edit]

In the "plot" it is mentioned that Enclave and Brotherhood of Steel in this game both differ from their western counterparts. But the very next sentence remarks that the Enclave is more or less the same. In my opinion the latter is correct, but either way it is a contradiction as it stands now. --131.169.89.168 (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the first part. Not a necessary statement anyway. -- ferret (talk) 12:48, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Gatling laser" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gatling laser. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 7#Gatling laser until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Super sledge" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Super sledge. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 7#Super sledge until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

Fallout 3[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

There's like a lot of issues in the gameplay section. It was written a little bit awfully (for now) and has sourcing issues, and some of it is possibly unsourced. It also needs to be trimmed down. Meanwhile, there are also citation errors, no authors at the citation, and unreliable sources like ref 22. The retail version sub-section is written like a list instead of prose. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 12:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]