Jump to content

Talk:Foucauldian discourse analysis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2019 and 20 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nicramirez1. Peer reviewers: Maraa09, Mariacrojas-pineda.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article does not address criticisms of Foucault, even the mild "hysterics" of Discipline and Punish (Geertz) to the usual judgment of analytic philosophers, "This is bullshit".  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to add a section criticizing this theory. I did not see relevant material in my research, but I just skimmed the surface, enough to get a beyond-stub definition entry. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Piotrus, Piotrus, Piotrus!
Well, I don't nag friends about smoking ..., so I should have looked to see you as the initial author, and then I should have chosen my words ... even more diplomatically.
Well, I have read my share of Foucault, when I was young and subject to the discipline and punishment of anthropology and sociology and philosophy professors!  ;)
Cheers,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 18:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, discipline and punishment, very fitting :D I am not the biggest fan of F. on the bloc, but I was reading a paper using this theory, the theory was missing from Wikipedia and seems quite notable, so... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]