Talk:Fraidy Cat (film)

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Tom and Jerry filmography
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:Tom and Jerry filmography

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.

Animation: Films

	Animation portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
	This redirect is supported by the Animated films work group.

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:Fraidycat.jpg[edit]

Image:Fraidycat.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fraidycat1.jpg[edit]

Image:Fraidycat1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 98.254.83.35, 17 September 2010[edit]

{{edit semi-protected}}

Censorship[edit]

All of the parts with Mammy Two Shoes on-screen are cut out on Cartoon Network due to Tom biting Mammy in the rear. In addition, during the latter sequence, Mammy's voice (where she is off screen) and the music score following this incident is redubbed with music that plays during another cut scene. The result of this is that it makes it appear as though Jerry get scared by his ghostly self, instead of Tom and Jerry both losing, making the cat win by default. [1]

98.254.83.35 (talk) 03:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks, Stickee (talk) 05:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 98.254.83.35, 17 September 2010[edit]

{{edit semi-protected}}

Censorship[edit]

+ * All of the parts with Mammy Two Shoes on-screen are cut out on Cartoon Network due to Tom biting Mammy in the rear. In addition, during the latter sequence, Mammy's voice (where she is off screen) and the music score following this incident is redubbed with music that plays during another cut scene. The result of this is that it makes it appear as though Jerry get scared by his ghostly self, instead of Tom and Jerry both losing, making the cat win by default. [2]

98.254.83.35 (talk) 19:56, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Could you please express your request by detailing the desired change in a 'please change X to Y' manner? Inserting the section breaks from the article, in particular, makes servicing your request more difficult than it should be. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 20:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see - it is identical. The bulk of the previous request was not supported by the source, so another editor deleted the unsupported content. That is how it is supposed to work. If you want to add additional content, you need to find a source which supports that content. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 98.254.83.35, 18 September 2010[edit]

{{edit semi-protected}} Delete the censorship section

98.254.83.35 (talk) 01:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. I'm sorry, but I honestly have no idea what the question is here. The 'Helpme' template's text states: "This template may only be used when followed by a specific description of the request, that is, specific text that should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y"." Shearonink (talk) 04:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 98.254.83.35, 19 September 2010[edit]

{{edit semi-protected}}

Delete censorship section

98.254.83.35 (talk) 03:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. elektrik SHOOS 03:36, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The info on the section is not accurately detailed, unlike previous versions of the page, which contain info on why the scenes were cut, and the background music score that was changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.254.83.35 (talk) 04:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from 98.254.83.35, 11 October 2010[edit]

{{edit semi-protected}} Delete the poorly-detailed censorship section, as the source cited is a poor source with no details of how the cuts to the film were made, unlike previous revisions of the page.

98.254.83.35 (talk) 19:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about restoring the previous version of the section, since you seem to think it was better? JamesBWatson (talk) 09:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheRealFennShysa had removed the previously accepted edit w/ the detailed censorship section, since the content submitted did not support the referenced source. 98.254.83.35 (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Already done The unsourced phrases of that section have been trimmed. Thanks, Stickee (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the censorship section is still on the page. i think the user 98 254 83 35. was asking for that censorship section to be removed. --Inxroad (talk) 22:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC) the section has now been removed. --Inxroad (talk) 23:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]