Jump to content

Talk:Gastroenteritis/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Diagnosis

I suggest someone in the know, preferably a health professional has a look over the diagnosis section. The whole article needs a once over. I have edited the diagnosis section to improve conciseness, grammer and spelling but the facts do need to be verified and cited.

--98dblachr (talk) 23:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Accuracy

24.196.90.128 (talk · contribs) posted a self-referential complaint on the page that the page is incomplete, and posted the accuracy tag above. Without any further details, I'm inclined to ignore this. JFW | T@lk 12:36, 26 July 2005 (UTC)


Going by http://www.emedicine.com/EMERG/topic213.htm I see no problem with the article as it stands. GraemeLeggett 16:27, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

And I've edited the page suitably

The J series is far out when it comes to ICD 10 coding for gastroenteritis

News update

In November 2005, Singapore licensed a new vaccine, called Rotarix, developed by drug manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) to protect infants against rotavirus gastroenteritis. [1] --Vsion 10:24, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

So? It was licensed in Mexico in 2004. GraemeLeggett 12:30, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Children?

All of the information on this page seems to relate to children, not to adults. I know that gastroenteritis can be contracted by adults, so why is all the info on kids?

I suspect it is because it is a much more serious problem in children. Adults find gastroenteritis to be annoying. Children can find it to be deadly. --Mdwyer 18:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Then that ought to be stated. --121.73.22.138 02:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Still needs to be fixed. Gastroenteritis isn't a child-specific disease. If there are specifics that need to be stated for the treatment of children, they should be covered in their own section, perhaps. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 17:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Treatment

The paragraph beginning: "The treatment for the stomach flu is simple" contradicts medical recommendations, specifically regarding the consumption of water to comabat diarrhea. For childen in particular, water is insufficient to replenish the electrolytes that they will lose from the diarrhea; if too many electrolytes are lost, severe illness or death can result (see Water Intoxication) See [2], [3], and [4]. Besides, the tone is wrong--more like a book of folk medicine than Wikipedia. Making recommendations for treatments rather than restating the typical treatments endorsed by the medical community seems pretty questionable, too.--H-ko 23:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree this paragraph has a wrong tone: it is written as a personal story ("I remember, when I got stomach flu, I started craving tatinos pizza and greasy food") and recommendations that seem wrong ("your urine should not have any yellow in it. If it does, just drink water."). I would rework/remove that paragraph but I do not know enough about wikipedia to do it (this is my first ever "edit"). It would be great if someone of experience could take a look and improve the article. Thanks. 216.239.85.91 02:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Where did that "pint of flat Diet Coke" line come from? 69.70.158.197 15:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Honestly, everyone in our (pretty big) family was suffering from stomach flu at least once in his lifetime. And we found that drinking too much just makes everything worse. What really helped everyone so far (in our family at least) was severely cutting down on food for a day (i.e. nothing, or a slice of toast at max.), little to drink and paracetamol. Because then the stomach finally gets some rest and it is much better next day already. What you should not do then though is consuming milk products. Instead, work on the electrolytes then :) pooch 82.12.249.229

This morning, my doctor just gave me Motilium (domperidone) for the bloatedness, Carbellon for the diarrhea, and something for the pain.. =.= and advised me not to take any dairy, spicy, or oily foods. dunno if it helps.. Lowch1 (talk) 10:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm concerned about the treatment advice. I really think wikipedia should refrain from giving such advice unless they are 100% certain it is correct. It currently says "he person's usual foods and drinks should not be withheld", which is strange given my doctor just placed me on a 36 hour fast. 84.201.158.100 (talk) 09:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

The World Health Organization recommends not withholding food and drink. However, as 84.201.158.100 says, it is very common for MDs to recommend fasting. If the person with gastroenteritis is otherwise healthy and well fed, fasting does little harm and lessens some unpleasantness. But if the person is already malnourished or ill, fasting can cause greater harm than good. The article could do a better job of explaining this. --Una Smith (talk) 14:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Viral gastroenteritis is caused by highly infectious viruses which usually enter the human body through the mouth.

This can occur by eating infected food or drink, but more commonly the virus passes directly from person to person. The time from initial infection with the virus, to developing the disease, is usually about 24–48 hours. The symptoms usually include vomiting, diarrhoea, nausea and stomach cramps. The illness is not usually serious and may only last a few hours.

The ill person is commonly infectious until about 48 hours after the illness has subsided. They should therefore be off school or work for this period, to avoid spreading the disease.

However, babies, the elderly and debilitated people can be particularly vulnerable to fluid loss and dehydration. This may occur through severe vomiting or diarrhoea.

Many different viruses can cause gastroenteritis, including rotaviruses, adenoviruses, caliciviruses, astroviruses, Norwalk virus, and a group of Noroviruses.

Viral gastroenteritis spreads very easily …

Large numbers of highly infectious virus particles are present in the vomit and bowel motions (faeces) of a person with the disease.

Thus, an infected person can easily pass the disease to someone else via their soiled fingers – or via surfaces or objects contaminated by tiny traces of their vomit or faeces.

Viral gastroenteritis is often caught by someone when their fingers have touched an infected surface or object and then put their fingers in their mouths.

Viral gastroenteritis can also be spread when food or drink has been handled and contaminated by an infected person, and this is then consumed by another person.

Types of viruses that cause

please list the type of viruses that cause. Tkjazzer 02:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree with the proposed merger with Bacterial gastroenteritis because the articles overlap. Viral gastroenteritis is covered by three articles: Rotavirus, Norovirus and Astrovirus although the last two (imo) require some work. GrahamColmTalk 18:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

I propose also to merge Gastritis and Enteritis into this article. Both are stubs and the natural overlap with gastroenteritis is very large. I would like to move some content from Rotavirus to this article, primarily the information about diagnosis and treatment. I think those two subjects would be better addressed in the broader context of identifying the causal agent of gastroenteritis. --Una Smith 19:33, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Rotavirus is getting large, a link to a good article on gastroenteritis would benefit it. GrahamColmTalk 19:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Gastritis is a completely separate condition to gastroenteritis, despite the similar sounding names. Both conditions have different causes, clinical symptoms and treatments. Please leave as individual articles.

I came here looking for information on Gastritis, which I have. Merging the Gastritis info with something that I do NOT have would have been confusing & harder to get the info I wanted. Why would you want to merge 2 completely different conditions? My symptoms & treatments are completely different. I strongly suggest, as a sufferer of Gastritis that you do NOT merge these completely different conditions! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.197.164 (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The "merge" templates are there to indicate the page is being examined as part of a project to edit several pages. I agree that gastritis should not be merged with gastroenteritis, and I have made edits to both pages accordingly. --Una Smith 19:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Current plan:

--Una Smith 21:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Update

Still needing work: Bacterial gastroenteritis, Infectious diarrhea, Enteritis. --Una Smith (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Bacterial gastroenteritis has been merged into Gastroenteritis. --Una Smith (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Death rate

A table showing the estimated death rate per year would be very interesting. Help gathering data (and references) would be appreciated! --Una Smith 19:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Una, I can do this, or at least make a good start, can you give me a week? And what do you think about a pie-chart of the causative agents? Graham. --GrahamColmTalk 19:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Images

I liked the previous, "close up" image of rotavirus in stool: it clearly showed the characteristic shape; I have in mind to gather comparable images here for norovirus, coronavirus, etc, to assist differential diagnosis by a non-specialist. Mention of the magnification of images would help too, else showing all images at approximately the same magnification for direct visual comparison. --Una Smith 19:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The images are misleading because they do not show the relative sizes of the viruses. This one does:

--GrahamColmTalk 19:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Good composite figure. Thanks! The individual images are from Commons? Sources should be indicated on the Commons page for this image. Why is label D a different color from the others? --Una Smith (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
The rotavirus, astrovirus and adenovirus are mine. The norovirus is from Commons. The D label is blue because when I used black or white it was very hard too see. I can change it if you want.--GrahamColmTalk 19:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Contradictory with no explanation: "Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine estimates the current total figure to be 2.4 to 2.9 million per year.[1] The global death rate has now come down significantly to approximately 1.5 million deaths annually, largely due to global introduction of proper oral rehydration therapy." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.170.30.168 (talk) 12:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Inappropriate treatments

draft, collected here pro tem. --Una Smith (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Withholding food/drink until diarrhea stops.
  • Drinking cola, carbonated or flat.
I was actually told (at a hospital, yes, by a doctor, yes) to stay away from food and take Imodium and Gatorade til the diarrhoea & vomiting was halted, after which to eat burned toast exclusively until I could tolerate white rice, applesauce and bananas; then to stay with just that until I could start digesting something else. And slowly add foods back into my diet one at a time. Definitely I'd think you'd have to avoid coffee, alcohol and milk until the gastroenteritis is well passed. Dairy products in particular, since gastroenteritis may cause secondary lactose intolerance! So the idea of "just keep eating normally" seems kinda nuts. I'd like to see proper references. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 18:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
See Managing Acute Gastroenteritis Among Children: Oral Rehydration, Maintenance, and Nutritional Therapy, MMWR Recommendations and Reports, November 21, 2003 / 52(RR16);1-16 here. --Una Smith (talk) 20:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, that write-up is for infants and toddlers, mainly in the third world. Anything for people who aren't infants and toddlers? I think a problem here is that while gastroenteritis might be a major problem in the third world, the average person looking up this article would be an English-speaking first-world adult who'll experience projectile diarrhea like I did when I tried to add solid food back into my diet within a week of getting gastroenteritis. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 20:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
As the article says, prevention of dehydration is the first priority, followed by preservation of nutritional status. Comfort and convenience come a distant third. Here is an NIH page about treatment of viral gastroenteritis in both adults and children. It recommends withholding food for a few hours. PMID 8945701 has the title The management of infective gastroenteritis in adults. A consensus statement by an expert panel convened by the British Society for the Study of Infection. --Una Smith (talk) 23:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Other Causes?

I got diagnosed with this as a result of drinking way too much the two days before (while still on a hangover from last night's binge, I got really drunk again, and the following day had acute gastroenteritis, according to my doctor). I've actually gotten it a couple times because of drinking. I mostly see causes attributed to viruses in this article. Shouldn't causes such as mine be mentioned? 203.253.171.128 (talk) 16:56, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Death Rate per year

Is the death rate per year 5-8 million or 1.5? The background and the Epidemiology section seem to claim different things. JayEsJay (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 06:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC).

How long it lasts

I hope nobody minds, but I had this 2 years ago and mine lasted 6 weeks, and it took an extra 2 weeks to regain my strength from 6 weeks of not eating or drinking anything. I already added the 6 weeks part, but I don't know if I should include the recovery process. Also, it's original research so theres no links to prove it.

Sorry, this is original research and cannot be included. Graham Colm Talk 11:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

"Famous People Who've Had It" Section

Is this really necessary? Especially in its current form?

It, to me, resembles something from a cheap magazine.

Ventolin (talk) 03:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

intestinal metaplasia and chronic inflammation

Wondering if someone could explain this condition and how to heal it in the stomach? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.204.72.236 (talk) 23:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Chronic Gastroenteritis/Mal-absorption

I'm wondering if Gastroenteritis can be chronic. The article says it is 'usually' acute, which by definition would mean some cases can be chronic.

I'm also wondering if Gastroenteritis can lead to poor absorption of medications, leading to withdrawal or other complications. Darktangent (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Loperamide

Suggesting loperamide for gastroenteritis seems like a bad idea to me. I hope JFW will step in here. Loperamide is for treatment of diarrhoea -- which is usually a symptom of gastroenteritis. Diarrhoea is the body's way to flushing out toxins, so loperamide might actually cause the toxins to be retained in the body. This would seem to be a Bad Thing. It would be indicated in some cases, but certainly not in the case of gastroenteritis caused by poisoning or infection. --Mdwyer 18:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, JFW and Nescio! --Mdwyer 17:33, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

I am a little confused, these conditions are apparently not forms of enteritis. What exactly is "erroneous" about it?

Holland Nomen Nescio 19:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Crohns does not cause gastroenteritis sensu strictu, and ulcerative colitis does not cause gastritis at all (it is by definition limited to the colon or maximumally some backwash iliitis). Gastroenteritis is almost automatically infective. I would not support the forking of infective gastroenteritis. Lactose intolerance causes diarrhoea, but not vomiting, and certainly not gastroenteritis. Longstanding enteritis (especially giardiasis) can cause lactose intolerance.
As for loperamide, this is good for symptom control and is regarded as safe in uncomplicated diarrhoea (i.e. not associated with bleeding and fever). There is no evidence for the suggestion that toxins need to be flushed out. In gastroenteritis the causative agent is microbial or viral, and resolution depends on an immune response more than actual physical clearance of the agent. JFW | T@lk 20:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello, In light of this response about loperamide, should the mention of gastroenteritis resulting from staphylococcal enterotoxin B be removed from this article? As it stands 2011/07/26 the article says that bacterial toxins (which can be present with or without viable bacteria) can cause gastroenteritis. Since the article about SEB does not mention the ability of human cells to metabolize SEB, it seems reasonable that the way that the body gets better is by getting the toxins out of the intestines. I wonder if mentioning how common the relative causes of gastroenteritis-- actual infection (by various bacteria and viruses where known) versus irritation from bacteria-produced toxin, versus irritation from foods or whatever else-- would be relevant for mention of what standard treatments are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.78.238.71 (talk) 19:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
I am no gastroenterologist, but I spent some time at oncology and my supervisor said people suffered from chemotherapy as result of mucositis, causing oesophagitis, gastritis or enteritis. Second, although mostly infection related, does not "inflammation" of the digestive tract (for whatever reason) also constitute gastroenteritis? That is, through infection, poisoning, inflammatory disease, drugs, et cetera? As to lactose intolerance, it works both ways. It can be the result, or the cause of gastroenteritis. At least that's what the textbooks say.Holland Nomen Nescio 21:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Statistically gastroenteritis is infective, but I agree that severe mucositis can be listed as a cause for gastroenteritis. Which textbook lists gastritis as a consequence of lactose intolerance? I really would like to see that confirmed. JFW | T@lk 21:42, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Reviews

  • McClarren, RL (2011 Sep). "Acute infectious diarrhea". Primary care. 38 (3): 539–64, ix. PMID 21872096. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Rodríguez, L (2011 Apr). "Malnutrition and gastrointestinal and respiratory infections in children: a public health problem". International journal of environmental research and public health. 8 (4): 1174–205. PMID 21695035. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Glass, RI (2009 Oct 29). "Norovirus gastroenteritis". The New England journal of medicine. 361 (18): 1776–85. PMID 19864676. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Patel, MM (2009 Jan). "Noroviruses: a comprehensive review". Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology. 44 (1): 1–8. PMID 19084472. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Marshall, JA (2011 Apr). "The dynamics of norovirus outbreak epidemics: recent insights". International journal of environmental research and public health. 8 (4): 1141–9. PMID 21695033. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Graham, SM (2010 Oct). "Nontyphoidal salmonellosis in Africa". Current opinion in infectious diseases. 23 (5): 409–14. PMID 20736739. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:20, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Merge

Infectious diarrhea has sufficient overlap with gastroenteritis that it should be merged IMO.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

We have to be careful. Gastroenteritis includes vomiting as a symptom (by definition), but worms, protozoa, campylobacter, salmonellae and shigellae rarely cause vomiting. So what would we call the merged article? Graham Colm (talk) 23:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
The terms are frequently used interchangeable. ICD 10 uses simply "intestinal infectious diseases" [5]. Does not need to include vomiting. Travelers diarrhea is a type of gastro but rarely has vomiting. Vomiting is just a potentially symptoms which occurs more frequently in children but is not universal.
  • Here is a paper that say Campylobacter is the most common cause of bacterial gastroenteritis in the developed world Galanis, E (2007 Sep 11). "Campylobacter and bacterial gastroenteritis". CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 177 (6): 570–1. PMID 17846438. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Missing pipe in: |journal= (help)
  • We have a definition here that states gastroenteritis is inflammation of any segment of the GI tract [6]
My proposal is to combine both and move it to a single page which would start with Infectious gastroenteritis which includes infectious diarrhea. We would than have one paragraph on non infectious gastroenteritis which is uncommon compared to the infectious variety.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Merging infectious diarrhea is a good idea but I would suggest keeping the title "gastroenteritis". The term "gastroenteritis" is almost always used to refer to infectious gastroenteritis in both lay and medical literature. The term "gastroenteritis" as literally meaning inflammation of any part of the GI tract does rarely occur in the GI literature (e.g. ischemic gastroenteritis in children) and should be referenced as a paragraph in the same article -- Samir 16:27, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Samir I would agree with our Wiki Gastroenterologist. :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Dysentery

Dysentery is another closely related type of gastroenteritis.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:18, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Update

The correct reference for 1.3 million is this 2010 article from The Lancet available athttp://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(10)60549-1/abstract.
Black, RE (2010 Jun 5). "Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis". Lancet. 375 (9730): 1969–87. PMID 20466419. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
The correct reference for "More than 450,000" is this 2011 article in The Lancet available athttp://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099%2811%2970253-5/abstract.
Tate, JE (2012 Feb). "2008 estimate of worldwide rotavirus-associated mortality in children younger than 5 years before the introduction of universal rotavirus vaccination programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis". The Lancet infectious diseases. 12 (2): 136–41. PMID 22030330. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
The correct reference for 85 percent: WHO. Global networks for surveillance of rotavirus gastroenteritis, 2001–2008. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2008;83(47):421–428 available at http://www.who.int/wer/2008/wer8347.pdf.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:14, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gastroenteritis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:18, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall: On hold for an indefinite time.
    Pass/Fail:
  • Sorry for the long delay; my monitor has an odd graphical error which I can not fix. I am currently editing on a very low resolution.
  • According to my medical dictionary, the pathogen is sometimes, but rather rarely, staphylococci. Not sure if it is important to mention, though.
Okay found a review and added a comment on it.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Maybe add what type of food causes the transmission of these bacteria (eg. butter, meat, eggs, etc).
Good idea. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
  • No mention of the incubation time (4-48 hours according to my dictionary)?
Under signs and symptoms "Signs and symptoms usually begin 12–72 hours after contracting the infectious agent." --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:10, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
  • According to my book, a pronounced exsiccosis might appear through water and mineral loss, which in combination with a toxemia might cause a collapse (Cholera nostras). Is this worth the mention?
Should be within the cholera article. But I agree we need more details on cholera here.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:14, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
  • Why not use more pictures (not a requirement, but the article looks better if there are more pictures than only one)? Here are some:
Added one.Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:14, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
  • The article is at the moment too human-centric; how about some information about the illness in animals, such as dogs and hamsters (see German article; although uncited, I am pretty sure you can find some useful content)?
Have added some. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:03, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
  • (The history section is rather small. Are there really no more information about the "discovery" of Gastroenteritis? Do ancient Egyptians, Greeks, etc knew about this disease? If yes, how did they treated it? And I am not sure if the mention of an US president is really necessary and appropiate. I think there should be some sort of a "notable people with gastroenteritis" section) <-- This might be useful if you want to raise the article to FA-status. I searched for more informatino about this, but I could not find any. It is fine at the moment. If possible create a see-also and an external links section.
See also sections are not recommended per WP:MEDMOS. I have requested that DMOZ add gastroenteritis but this might take some time. We do have external links in the infobox. With respect to the history of the disease the term was only coined in 1825 per the OED. I am having trouble finding good sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:28, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

--GoPTCN 22:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

"Stomach and small intestine"

Can we get confirmation gastroenteritis refers only to inflammation of the stomach and small intestine? In the paraphysiology section it says it refers to the large bowel too... 129.180.95.230 (talk) 05:04, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

"Developing word", please add "and some developed countries"

We have had similar rate as described in the so called developing world for years. It would be statistically correct to add "and some developed countries". Please consider this remark. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.206.169.159 (talk) 17:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

ref needed Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:25, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

typo/spelling/grammar

Please correct an error in the lead of this locked article: "breast feeding especially in areas were sanitation is less good". 'were' should be 'where'. I would also change the vague 'less good' to 'inadequate', but that is personal preference. 72.60.146.110 (talk) 23:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Will fix the first. We try to use simple English in the lead. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! 72.60.82.148 (talk) 04:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Typo

Third paragraph "In those who are breast feed, continued breast feeding is recommended." should say "In those who are breastfed" not "feed" — Preceding unsigned comment added by SensoryOssuary (talk • contribs) 01:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Illogical

Please read and fix the sentence that includes "especially in areas where sanitation is less good". The sentence is talking about prevention, so it is incorrect to advise people to breast feed in areas with poor sanitation. This should be changed to breast feed in areas with better sanitation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:0:AF00:C6:A1CA:8584:1789:666F (talk) 22:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

crohn's, infectious evidence, MAP

cddc nsw australia - prof borody evidence to support findings of MAP in humans and as in johne's disease in cattle MAP found again.

Relevant and scientific enough to warrant altering the 'non infectious' term in the Crohn's statements in this article anyone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.89.194 (talk) 18:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Statistical prevalence

Can someone please comment on the statistics referenced in the article?

For example, I see that 50% of gastroenteritis cases are caused by norovirus and that 1 in 1,000 people have gastroenteritis (at any given time, I assume).

As a reader in a first world country, my instant reaction is to wonder whether these are globally averaged statistics, and if so whether they are actually meaningful in any given part of the world.

Given varying levels of hygiene globally, I would expect both the incidence and the causes of gastroenteritis to be markedly different between, say, Sweden and Bangladesh.

Perhaps immune response in different parts of the world should even the statistics out. If so, some comment to that effect would be most helpful.

Thank you.

This was an old comment and it looks like the article now has a bit more of a global distributed focus rather than a single country area descriptive content structural presentation. 173.225.249.190 (talk) 12:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Focus

Why did this article get a GA icon when it focuses almost exclusively on the disease in children? Yoninah (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

It is both more common and more serious in children. The disease is also discussed in adults. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gastroenteritis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Some practical holes in this otherwise very detailed article

As I just had the damn thing (presumably contracted in a Seniors home, where contaminated water and other third world concerns would not be a factor), I was looking for some specific common answers... and did NOT get them here: "close contact" did not give me a clue about the vectors (saliva?, blood?, piss?, stools?, skin?, air?, etc.) and "the condition usually resolves within one week" did not give much either as to a safe "quarantine" time AFTER I was good to go. Missed opportunity here; moving to more specialized web sites I guess. 

AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 19:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Viral causes

doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31128-0 JFW | T@lk 09:08, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2018

Within the Diagnosis section, there's a sentence that says "It may also be appropriate in children young than 5, old people, and those with poor immune function". "Younger" should be used in place of "young".

Cheers. Abm11 (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

 Done LittlePuppers (talk) 19:38, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

If

IIRC:

  • the present gastroenteritis article describes infectious gastroenteritis, which is a class of diseases, but
  • gastroenteritis is a symptom (it is sa disease ) whose causes can include ingestion of irritants like ethyl alcohol, aspirin, and cooking spices (and perhaps also overeating?).

IMO someone willing to do more research than i am at the moment should confirm this, rename, and convert the redir to a Dab between infectious gastroenteritis and something else ( non-infectious gastroenteritis is probably not what we need).
--Jerzy(t) 06:33, 2005 Feb 24 (UTC)

Gastroenteritis is also a symptom of poisoning from various causes. Some of these are mentioned in the article, but should also have a brief mention in the lead & in the differential disagnosis section. However, heavy metal poisoning needs to be added; historically, arsenic & antimony poisoning are important if rare, including notable murder cases. That they are very rare today is partly due I believe to good differential diagnosis. An 'In fiction' section could also be added; there are dozens of cases of arsenic & antimony poisoning in GA whodunits, although a handful of notable examples should suffice. When I get to my desktop/get a round tuit…. --70.67.234.42 (talk) 17:31, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Oops, the second comment is mine, wasn't signed in --D Anthony Patriarche, BSc (talk) 17:39, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Can we remove the "notes" section?

There is only one textbook in the "notes" section: Dolin, Raphael; Mandell, Gerald L.; Bennett, John E., eds. (2010). I think we can delete that, right? Perhaps it's a left-over from the other referencing style where textbooks are listed in a separate section. EMsmile (talk) 01:32, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Yes, the book is cited in full as reference 17. --Graham Beards (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Do I understand correctly that your comment means you're OK with deleting the "notes" section (just double checking)? I saw that Reference 17 cites the same book. It means we can delete the "notes" section without losing anything as the reference is already provided in Reference 17, correct?. Other books are not listed under "Notes", e.g. Reference 88. EMsmile (talk) 23:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

How about a section on Gastroenteritis vs Enterocolitis?

I have justed added reciprocal "See also" sections for this article and the one for Enterocolitis. It would be very useful to have a short section in each article discussing the relationship and distinction/differentiation between the two diseases, which certainly appear to be quite similar, especially in terms of how they present. (My sense of things is that Enterocolitis might possibly even be regarded as a subset/"special case" of Gastroenteritis.) Anomalous+0 (talk) 21:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

PS - Please {{ping|Anomalous+0}} me if you reply. Thanks! Anomalous+0 (talk) 23:24, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Multiple claims are made that are not backed up by the cited source

Source #1 is cited multiple times for multiple claims, some of which are not found at this source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.66.222.25 (talk) 23:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gastroenteritis/Archive_1&oldid=1144167936"