Talk:Ghetto riots (1964–1969)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Arrested[edit]

20,000 or 200,000 ? Nemo 07:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article Name Change/Deletion[edit]

I nominated this article for deletion on June 3rd, 2020. After two weeks of comments, the decision was to keep the article. I think this was a good decision, and ultimately, I think I was convinced by several arguments in favor of keeping the article. However, I agree with several commentators from the deletion discussion that the name of the article should be changed. Some suggestions for possible alternate names mentioned in that discussion:

  • 1960s urban unrest in the United States
  • Race riots in the United States in the 1960s

Along with a name change, there were a number of suggestions for improving the article mentioned by commentators in the deletion discussion. I hope some of these changes can be made! A number of sources were also linked by commentators that could/should be incorporated into the article. Thanks so much to all the people who contributed to the discussion. I hope this page can grow and improve! Coffeespoons (talk) 04:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing research related to this topic and I was utterly shocked to see it called "Ghetto riots." There are NO scholars or sociologists using that term. Not only is it offensive, it divorces the article from the body of scholarship and makes it hard to find. Change, please. 173.70.35.167 (talk) 17:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While it seemed hard to decide at first, the relist revealed a majority 'keep'. (non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy (talk) 09:34, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ghetto riots[edit]

Ghetto riots (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Several reasons for deletion, which broadly fall under verifiability (WP:V) and and neutral point of view (WP:NPOV):

  • The term 'Ghetto Riots' is not in common use by any reliable contemporary historians, as far as I can tell. All the sources I've found which reference this term are from the period in which it was occurring and just after (the 1968-1971 range). I have not been able to find any contemporary sources that reference 'ghetto riots' or any comparable name for this series of events. In fact, I haven't found any indication that this particular series of riots should be regarded separately from the Civil Rights Movement in general.
  • This article covers a topic that is covered much more effectively by other pages, such as 'Mass racial violence in the United States' and 'Civil rights movement.' Both of those pages cover this period in greater detail, more effectively describe and link to the events discussed in this article, and do a better job of contextualizing riots within other historical events occurring at the time. This page isn't adding anything to our understanding of this topic.
  • There are a variety of issues with neutral point of view. The best examples of this are in the Introduction and Background sections, which make a variety of unsubstantiated assertions. The name of the article itself is also debatable, given the controversial connotations of the word 'ghetto,' and the fact that the term 'ghetto riots' is not used by any contemporary historians. Of course, these impartiality issues by themselves aren't cause to delete the page, but in conjunction with the other issues listed, I think it makes more sense to just delete it than to try and repair it.

In short, this article uses a term that is no longer in use for a series of events which are well-explained elsewhere, and has overarching POV issues. It should be deleted.

This is my first time nominating an article for deletion, so apologies in advance if I'm not following the right process here. Thanks! Coffeespoons (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Coffeespoons (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coffeespoons (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coffeespoons (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Coffeespoons (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No problem Coffeespoons, I don't really know the proper deletion process either. I'll add my two cents. There are modern scholars and commentators that refer to this period as the "ghetto violence of the 1960s" or more often the "ghetto rebellions". You are right that the specific term "ghetto riots" I've found to be mostly used by scholars in the 1960s and 70s. I'll drop some links for the modern usage of "ghetto rebellions". I do recognize that this phenomenon is separate (although related) to the civil rights movement. While the civil rights movement was a long mostly non violent organized protest movement for desegregation, these riots were spontaneous and unorganized clashes in American cities. I think issues of the article's naming and neutrality are real and can be fixed. I think we should also expand and add info that describes more about this unique phenomenon in American history. This page has some problems, but I'd rather see it fixed than deleted.Mangokeylime (talk) 00:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per nom, this is a content fork of other, better articles that do not have the same WP:FRINGE and WP:NPOV problems. Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:06, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, The use of the term "ghetto" is thoroughly covered in both the sources cited in the article and those cited by Mangokeylime. The specific term "ghetto riots" may not be specifically used in the literature, as a scholarly consensus is absent and is not meant to be a set name like a battle in a war, but it is a descriptor of a string of related events that, per Mangokeylime's source, "turned them from episodic outbreaks of discontent into a force that transformed U.S. politics." You're right that it is not separate from the rest of the Civil Rights Movement, but it is distinct, characterized by the same tactics, time period, similar locations, and caused by the same material conditions, and so I don't think it can be accurately described as just "mass violence." Would we delete all of the articles about medieval Peasant Rebellions to a more general article about "mass violence"? I would think not. You talk about claims being unsubstantiated, so name them. Additionally, it is a useful content fork that helps organize a series of multiple related events through its table and helps readers understand why they're related by being a standalone article. Ultimately, I don't believe a deletion is warranted. Ashleyisvegan (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The riots were a real, historical event. Removing the page for them would seem to imply that they either weren't historically relevant, or that they didn't happen at all. If you have real concerns about the tone/neutrality of this page, then the page should be revised to reflect those concerns. Surely, deleting the page would have the opposite effect? It certainly isn't neutral to erase history.

Yoshmaster (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The time period that this article covers (1964-1968) accurately describes a period where there were an unusually large number of race riots. If keeping the article's name is impossible, it should at least be renamed. Scorpions13256 (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, none of the nom's rationales for deletion hold water. Taking them in order;
  1. Our criterion for naming articles is not "in common use by any reliable contemporary historians", rather, it is WP:COMMONNAME. This was certainly the common name in the 60s and 70s. Here is a book with the phrase in the title, and another with that as a chapter heading. More are not hard to find. The claim that historians no longer use the phrase is dubious at best. This 1999 paper includes the snippet "Smith and Hawkins (1973), for example, reviewed some early studies of citizen attitudes toward police. Many of these were conducted following ghetto riots in the 1960s." This 1993 paper has the phrase in its title, and even more recently, this 2016 book uses the phrase in several places.
  2. The claim that Mass racial violence in the United States covers this better and in context is ridiculous. The nominated article is about a specific episode in US history in the 1960s. The Mass racial... article covers everything from pre-Civil War slave revolts, through Native American massacres, to anti-Catholic violence. I find it difficult to accept the article binds all these into a single contextual whole. The 1960s riots are given only one paragraph, hardly better coverage than a full article can do.
  3. Lack of NPOV is cited, but the only explicit complaint seems to be the term ghetto riots. There is a vague handwave to the background section, but that is fully cited. I haven't checked those particular sources, but I saw very similar passages in the sources I did look at while doing my own searches. Articles are not usually deleted for POV problems unless they are so severe that there is nothing salvagable in the page. In any case, so far I see no case to answer on POV, and as the nom has admitted, such problems can be fixed by ordinary editing, as can the title of the page if editors think it is so offensive. SpinningSpark 18:40, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. A quick look through newspapers.com tells me the term "ghetto riots" was indeed in wide circulation and was often followed by "...of the 1960s", so the article reaches the standard of, yes, this was an actual & notable thing. A quick look through wikipedia tells me the overall topic seems not to be covered elsewhere. These kinds of groupings of historical events can lead to bad habits like synthesis and OR and lazy generalizations if we're not careful, and the article needs some help, but it's worth keeping. --Lockley (talk) 02:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Nicely done, @Coffeespoons:, what a refreshing show of good faith. It's all constructive up in here, wow. In the AfD discussion comments below, I did not mention another article which is similar in content, and in fairly good shape: Long, hot summer of 1967. That article describes 150+ U.S. ghetto riots of that specific year. All of them belong in the larger scope of this "Ghetto riots" article, in a pretty clean set-subset relationship if you see what I mean. I personally think both articles have a reasonable scope and should continue to exist in parallel. That'll take a little bit of patching together, back and forth, which I'm happy to start.
I'd also invite other eyes & opinions about potential POV issues here. The one issue is that word "ghetto" in the title. Either of your suggested new titles would be better. --Lockley (talk) 08:33, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think we need to set aside our modern sensitivity on terminology here and think about what is best for the reader. The term ghetto riots is highly likely to be found in books and newspapers and thus is a likely search term a user might type in the search box. This ngram says it all. SpinningSpark 10:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also interesting: [1]. The numbers are quite low so the differences are not necessarily relevant, but I believe the trends are. In particular, "negro riots" was common in the 1960s but was already fading in the 1970s, apparently replaced by "ghetto riots". "Race riots" has a longer history and was used for much earlier riots too.
Please also consider international understanding of the English words here. Some such words have very different connotations in different cultures. Nemo 06:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

planned name change[edit]

All right! I plan to change this title to "Ghetto riots in the United States (1964–1969)". After the above discussion and looking into a bit, I've found

  • the term "ghetto riot" was used then, and is still used today
  • including the U.S. and the time frame in the title suggests "ghetto" is used specific to this time and place
  • "race riot" would not be specific enough, because civil rights disturbances going on concurrently could also be fairly described that way, but had very different origins & dynamics

Other opinions welcome. I'll wait a few days for feedback then make the move. --Lockley (talk) 22:00, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The term is not used today as claimed, at least not by MSM. There has been plenty of panracial acts of brutality from the security sector that have resulted in riots across the country since 2012, and not one of those has been referred to as a 'ghetto riot'.72.174.131.123 (talk) 01:36, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ghetto_riots_(1964–1969)&oldid=1207413476"