Talk:Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleGol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907 is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 26, 2007Good article nomineeListed
June 26, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
July 25, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
August 3, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
March 29, 2010Featured article reviewKept
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 29, 2011, September 29, 2012, September 29, 2014, September 29, 2016, and September 29, 2018.
Current status: Featured article

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Article not moved, there is no consensus to move the article ~~ GB fan ~~ 04:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907 → 2006 Amazon Rainforest mid-air collision — Should be moved to 2006 Amazon Rainforest mid-air collision, based on the fact that both aircraft were operated by commercial institutions (although only Flight 1907's flight number is known). — 18:22, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

  • Oppose. See [1] [2]... Google gets only two hits for the proposed title (even when shaved of the date) and thousands for the current one, which has achieved notoriety for several reasons, primarily the subsequent air traffic controller crisis and the photo hoax [3], both of them precipitated by the crash rather than directly by the collision. So firstly it's the crashed flight that is the primary focus of this article, and secondly the proposed title is so unlikely to be a search target as to even make a redirect pointless. Andrewa (talk) 18:33, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support certainly involves more than one flight... and this article also covers what happened to the Legacy. 76.66.200.95 (talk) 02:53, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Andrewa. [|Retro00064|☎talk|✍contribs|] 17:41, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

New sources[edit]

WhisperToMe (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just watched the episode of Air Crash Investigations related to this accident, and seems quite informative. Can a video be used also as a source, if it adds information for a wikiarticle? (e.g.: the transponder issue, and the impact not only on both aircraft TCAS but also on the ground control system readings). Regards, DPdH (talk) 11:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, better late than never. Have a great 2016. DPdH (talk) 06:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy[edit]

I don't remeber the details, but at the time there was a major conspiracy theory about high ranking brazilian officials in the GOL flight, some scientist that developed something, I don't remember if it was some sort of fuel or something to do with amazonian ecology/biology. And that the Legacy guys attacked intentionally to kill those guys and make it look like an airplane accident. Dunno if the conspiracy was true, but was somewhat widespread (not generally accepted, but at least generally known (not many knew details, but most had heard something along those lines, like I have)) after the accident in Brazil. 189.63.124.26 (talk) 16:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Links of references 75 and 76 need to be updated[edit]

The articles named by the above references are no longer at the URLs to which the links point. --anon. 71.183.136.48 (talk) 00:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign reactions[edit]

WhisperToMe (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Polar Air Cargo Flight 71[edit]

I found this draft article while exploring DRAFTspace. I've suggested it be merged here, for the discussion, see Draft talk:Polar Air Cargo Flight 71 -- 65.94.171.206 (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional references[edit]

WhisperToMe (talk) 04:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:25, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:PR-GTD at GIG.jpg[edit]

@Tigerdude9: Thank you for providing a better image of the aircraft for the infobox. Are you sure that the image has been authorized? Who did you get permission from and how did you go about uploading it? You need to provide evidence of copyright approval and then someone has to review it and store it in the permission archive before you can be authorized to add a file to Wikimedia Commons. I've never done this myself, but I'm sure you're not supposed to just upload a file and say "I have permission from the owner to use the image" which, frankly, anyone could say. Rodney Baggins (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the image is authorized. I emailed the owner asking for permission, he said yes, I chose the correct settings and yeah it's authorized. Also, I'll try to say something better when I do edits like these. You are welcome. Tigerdude9 (talk) 01:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tigerdude9: File:PR-GTD at Rio-.jpg has been removed by an administrator at Wikimedia Commons because it has been identified as "non-free fair use content" and what we need is a "public-domain or suitably licensed" image. Like I said before, It is not sufficient to simply state that you got permission from the owner without going through the correct channels to get it included in the Commons repository. If you want some advice about doing this, please go to the Commons help desk. It would be great if we could use your image, it really would, but it needs to be legitimate and at the moment it isn't. As for the CGI replacement, that's been found to be unsuitable before (as explained by MilborneOne in a previous edit) so I've replaced it for now with another Boeing 737-8EH that looks like the accident aircraft. Rodney Baggins (talk) 08:09, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:33, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plane falling from engine problems[edit]

Captain:SHIT WERE FALLING co-pilot:I SEE THAT DO SOMETHING Captain:IM TRYING co-pilot:CHARLI PULL UP Captain:I KNOW IM TRYING TO the recording was off but we can see or hear the explosion hidden reasons the Captain was Charlie and the co-pilot was nelson the alarm system might have been broken because a weird alarm went off There might have been more but this info is the only one u can get there was 90 passengers and 5 survived the plane was klm but the passengers can't get info they were injured badly. 24.184.84.207 (talk) 17:52, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is that from a transcript of the black box recording? If so could a link to the transcript be included in the page? Also you say there were five survivors, did they die later from injuries? Please, can you describe the weird alarm further? Thanks!👍 Bucky winter soldier (talk) 19:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure you confused this accident with a different one. Scs52 (talk) 01:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gol_Transportes_Aéreos_Flight_1907&oldid=1217135303"