Talk:Happy Hollow Heights Historic District

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Indiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Question about link[edit]

@Nyttend: A reader contacted Wikimedia in noted that the link to Happy Hollow Heights Historic District Brings up the Hill and Dales nomination form. Presumably, they thought this was an error and that was my first thought. I did a brief review of the NRHP database, searching for Happy Hollow and I see that Hill and Dale's comes up in the search without any specific entry for Happy Hollow.

However, you have much more experience with that database so I would appreciate it if you could double check to make sure before I respond to the reader that the link is correct.--S Philbrick (Talk) 14:20, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly an error on our part; the URL alone shows this. You couldn't find it because the historic district was so recently designated; unfortunately, the NR database is a few years out of date. I'm fixing this now. Thanks for the note! Nyttend (talk) 16:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS, Sphilbrick, see [1]; both the photo that I fixed in that edit and the citation that I just now fixed were simple copy/paste mistakes. Nyttend (talk) 16:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response.--S Philbrick (Talk) 17:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]