Talk:Heraclonas/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 21:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Heraclius is overlinked.
Done
The Emperor Heraclius died in February 641 from edema --> "The emperor Heraclius died in February 641 from edema"
Done
His reign is usually dated from April/May – September/October 641 What do you mean usually? Did some sources say another data?
Done
leaving the empire jointly to his eldest son The Empire.
Done
Constantine III, and Heraklonas,[7][5][8] Re-order the refs.
Done
I see four howevers which is a lot for a short article like this one.
Done
I see some DD/MM/YYYY and MM/DD/YYYY as usage maybe standardise them.
Done
under the regency of Martina.[11][12][8] Capitalise "under" because it is the start of a sentence and re-order the refs here.
Done
believed that Heraklonas died in 642.[15][12][5] Re-orde the refs.
Done
towns of Egypt, but was unable to cross the Nile Unlink the Nile because it's a common term.
Done
power to Constantine. Heraclius' will was objectionable to much Little bit wordy here. especially with thd "will was" part.
Done
he was informed by his financial minister --> "he was informed by his finance minister"
Done
No edit war.

Infobox

"February–April/May 641 (Co-emperor)" Just a suggestion but maybe you should put "(Co-emperor)" below the reign. This'd look a lot better.
Done
"Constantine III (February–April/May 641)" Same as above.
The template of the infobox prevents me from messing with the order of this. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"641 (aged 15)" --> "641 (aged 14–15)" Because we do not know when he was born.
The Moore source tells us he is 15. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Flavius Constantinus Heraclius (Heraclianus)" Augustus isn't there in the full name or wasn't that part of his full name?
I've removed it from his lede full name as it was part of his regnal name. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Some ISBNs have hyphens others don't, maybe standardise the ISBNs
Done
Add "Vol 2" in the Bellinger and Grierson's source.
Done
There is an error in the book of "Prosopographie der mittelbyzantinischen Zeit Online. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften" and could you please translate the books's title too?
Template doesn't allow a translation, but I have added the title. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Bibliography claims that the book of Moore was published in 1996 but both Google Books and archive.org claim it was from 1969, which one is correct?
The Moore source isn't a book, and the project wasn't started until 1996? Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Justinian II, Leontius and Tiberius 685-711" --> "Byzantium in the Seventh Century: Justinian II, Leontius and Tiberius 685-711"
Done
No OR.

Images

That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CPA-5: Believe I have done all you ask. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CPA-5: Repinging. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:09, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Iazyges: I was wondering why the Staurakios's article has a separete part called co-emporor but here we do not have that? I'm not sure why this is so. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 09:44, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@CPA-5: done. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:24, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll pass it believe it is ready to be a GA. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]