Jump to content

Talk:Hot Wheels Battle Force 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In-Universe

[edit]

I'm of the opinion a large portion of the article is described in an excessively in-universe style and reads as if someone were trying to compress a wiki dedicated to the show into a single page. Anyone agree? Rebel's Heart (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No connection to Hot Wheels AcceleRacers

[edit]
  • Someone wrote the contniue what happen after Hotwheels: AcceleRacers, thought it shows the Vert as the main character, but the there no source that it's a sequel to AcceleRacers.

The series had been by Nerd Corp. While Acceler Racers is done by Mainframe.(mich (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

  • Prone to agree with mich. Nothing in the show or official website connects this series to Acceleracers and Highway 35: World Race. Continuing to remove references as they appear. Tango the Mutt (talk) 14:31, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are correct. While I was at Comicon a few years ago, the makers of the show at the presentation panel confirmed that Battle Force 5 is set in a different continuity than Acceleracers, when they stated that this was a different Vert Wheeler. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.173.101.231 (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization and Spelling

[edit]

Please cite alternative spellings here.

  • Battlezone - At the beginning of a sentence or as part of a proper name, ie: the Clockwork Battlezone.
  • BattleZone - Never.
  • Battle Zone - Never.
  • Battle Key(s) - Never.
  • Battle key(s) - When the word battle begins a sentence.
  • BattleKey(s) - Never.
  • Battlekey(s) - Never

Are the Sarks still Evil ?

[edit]
  • Any Questions?

According to the episode, yes, but that is because they are under control of the Red Sentients, not by Zemerik. JMBZ-12 (talk) 17:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC) no the ancient ones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.97.101.158 (talk) 00:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Serious edits

[edit]

i will be doing serious edits to this article due to it having heavy amount of trivia and original research and in-universe style . i already removed some characters due to only appearing once, and i will be trimming most of the character sections and possibly remove the location section or rewrite into a setting section. The Story also needs to be expanded aswellBread Ninja (talk) 06:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting up Character section

[edit]

The characters section is getting way too long, so i propose we either split it into a different page or shorten it a bit.IchiGhost (talk) 17:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We could do that, but we have to find references ot split the article.Bread Ninja (talk) 17:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't the page result in a stub, seeing as how splitting it would cause the main article to have very little information? JMBZ-12 (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, we need to update the pages so that someone who searches for "Battle Force 5" doesn't wind up at the outdated version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.173.101.209 (talk) 22:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting up Battle Zones section

[edit]

The list of Battle Zones is getting pretty long, should we go ahead and give it it's own page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.173.101.209 (talk) 18:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

that's in-universe information and should be removed. Plus it is also trivial. Instead you should be looking for real-world information. not in-universe.Bread Ninja (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Movie?

[edit]

The episode count on the main page and the episode list page both mention a movie (in the case of the episode list page, the section 'clues to the movie' was originally titled 'clues to season 3' but I don't know when this was changed), though I can find no reference to any movie either here or elsewhere on the internet. Can anybody verify this or is it just wishful thinking from an overenthusiastic fan? --Hunter X 101 (talk) 19:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is confirmed. Check out the list of episodes and check out the Facebook link -- it´s all there93.102.130.160 (talk) 22:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Series

[edit]

After Hot Wheels Battle Force 5, what's next? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.89.156.49 (talk) 02:18, 26 November 2011 (UTC) Stormshockers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.227.113.69 (talk) 07:19, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Team Hot Wheels Zcbtkn (talk) 18:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Hot Wheels Battle Force 5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stay away Eik_Corell

[edit]

You can't just come and delete an entire page. Zcbtkn (talk) 18:09, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]