Jump to content

Talk:In the Company of Men

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bullshit

[edit]

"The film currently has an 88% Fresh rating at the movie review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes, with 46 out of 52 critics rating it "Fresh".

How does bullshit like this find it's way into an encyclopaedia?

--No clue. This whole article sucks. This is probably the worst-written article I've ever seen on Wikipedia. Was this someone's high-school essay on this movie? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.193.182.86 (talk) 02:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on In the Company of Men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]