Talk:Ira T. Wyche

Ira T. Wyche received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Ira T. Wyche has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 17, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / North America / United States / World War I / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ira T. Wyche/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this in a day or two. auntieruth (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I was bold and fixed issues with verb tense, numbers, etc. Added a couple of links. Nicejob. auntieruth (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, nicely done. I wish I could write GAs.

—Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 20:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]