Talk:Jallianwala Bagh
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I think this page should just redirect to the Amritsar Massacre page but I don't know how to do that
jallianwala bad≤ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.168.237.193 (talk) 12:25, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jallianwala Bagh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070917142903/http://www.commonlii.org/in/legis/num_act/jbnma1951276/ to http://www.commonlii.org/in/legis/num_act/jbnma1951276/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Improvement[edit]
For Later years section: Does it qualify as WP:NOTNEWS? The place may have been visited by many dignitaries. Why write about some specific people? Only because they are British? I think it is unwarranted IMO. @Whispyhistory: -Nizil (talk) 06:11, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- I think the visits and apology etc things are covered well in Jallianwala Bagh massacre#Monument and legacy. So here it should only focus on the "place" with brief history. What do you think? -Nizil (talk) 06:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Nizil Shah:...Sure. We could see if other well documented and widely publicized visits have happened or leave it out. I'll have a read around. Thank you for watching over. What do you suggest? Maybe other editors might help. Whispyhistory (talk) 10:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @Nizil Shah: The visits from British and Indians are quite well publicised, so added some relevant to visiting the site. Please amend as feel appropriate. I found that there was a daily narration of the story of 1919 which was voiced by Amitabh Bachan...[1], [2], but I can't tell if when it started and if if temporally stopped or is still playing. Whispyhistory (talk) 16:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Whispyhistory: The light and sound show seem stopped due to lack of funds according to reference. So I suggest not to include it in the article (Reference of Feb 2019). The visits were well publicised and are covered in massacre article. I suggest to focus on place and memorials here. History of the massacre and visits are better left to massacre article because of better context there. Regards,Nizil (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Sure...will expand on memorials over time...I hope I have done ok...Whispyhistory (talk) 21:31, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Whispyhistory: After recent edits, I have cleaned up and reorganised the article. Please have a look. The early history (before massacre) needs references (tagged citation needed). I think some images in Jallianwala Bagh#Site next to text in each section (Entrance etc.) would give better context instead of images presented in Gallery. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 07:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Nizil Shah:... Looks good. I will do as you have suggested... sounds sensible. Whispyhistory (talk) 16:55, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Whispyhistory: After recent edits, I have cleaned up and reorganised the article. Please have a look. The early history (before massacre) needs references (tagged citation needed). I think some images in Jallianwala Bagh#Site next to text in each section (Entrance etc.) would give better context instead of images presented in Gallery. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 07:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sure...will expand on memorials over time...I hope I have done ok...Whispyhistory (talk) 21:31, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Whispyhistory: The light and sound show seem stopped due to lack of funds according to reference. So I suggest not to include it in the article (Reference of Feb 2019). The visits were well publicised and are covered in massacre article. I suggest to focus on place and memorials here. History of the massacre and visits are better left to massacre article because of better context there. Regards,Nizil (talk) 11:22, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi @Nizil Shah: The visits from British and Indians are quite well publicised, so added some relevant to visiting the site. Please amend as feel appropriate. I found that there was a daily narration of the story of 1919 which was voiced by Amitabh Bachan...[1], [2], but I can't tell if when it started and if if temporally stopped or is still playing. Whispyhistory (talk) 16:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Jallianwala bagh[edit]
soma loud 106.206.45.185 (talk) 13:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
History[edit]
Jallianwala bagh 205.253.11.197 (talk) 10:14, 7 January 2023 (UTC)