This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Okay, the article is severly lacking in sources and is incredibly short. However, there is to me a strong assertion of notability--high school players are most certainly normally not notable... but maybe--just maybe--the best defensive player of the year is. Tough call--I would rather see the article go through AFD and get some discussion going to build a better consensus. I might even take the position of "delete" or at least "neutral" after researching, but I think we need to go through this one by the numbers.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I'll let it rest, hopefully another editor will make it a more substantial article -or- Afd it. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 20:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
