Talk:Joseph Szigeti

older entries

This article sucks. You can help Wikipedia (and Szigeti) by adding more information, fixing bad style and grammar, and generally cleaning it up. :) Sorry for the sloppiness, but this was all I could do! K. Lastochka 19:03, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

...almost a year after my original cry for help, here I am fixing up the article. Firstly: I just added a photo, so no need to have the wikiproject box requesting a pic. :) Secondly, thanks to whoever added the infobox, but I have to be frank, I hate infoboxes. I think they're ugly and don't really add much in the way of useful information. I'm not going to boorishly revert the addition, but I will ask politely: is it OK if I remove it? K. Lásztocska 04:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Szigeti - a few notes which may or may not be useful? :-

• He was an adjudicator at the Carl Flesch competitions in the 1960s.
• First performed the Prokofiev op 19 concerto at International Society for Contemporary Music in prague 21 July 1924 under Fritz Reiner. - originally saw the MS at house of Jozéf Turczyński. Toured Europe with it. Recorded it first August 1935 w Thomas Beecham, London Philharmonic Orch, last 1906 w Herbert Menges and London Symphony Orch.
• Bartok dedicated his Rhapsody no 1 (op 5 no 1) to Szigeti in 1928
• Szigeti first saw Bartok at a concert in 1903, and struck up a friendship despite antipathy of hubay to B's music. hence the great legacy of their concerts and recordings together.

(These notes are from a HMV sleevenote to HLM 7016, written by Bill Newman, 1972, re-issue of the 1935 prokofiev etc.) - Any use? Dr Steven Plunkett 17:09, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

annoying template

I endorse the removal of the "under construction" template--I put it there when I was working on it, but then real life took over, I was off-wiki for a while, and I forgot about the template. I really will finish this article soon.....K. Lásztocska 18:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

my copyedits

Dont take them personally - You have done a fantastic job, KL and its ironic, I was thinking that since this is not too far off your present studies it would be only fair for you to get academic credit for this - however it would also be bonehead as it is the first cardinal sin to source the Wiki, much less turn in an entire paper "look what I wrote..." even though it would be true. I have two comments at this point - was he married to the same woman for all those years? Its important in a bio, especially for the lifestyle and all the moving they did. Secondly, the passage about the book is overkill here, and is better off as a separate article, linked from this one, with maybe one or two paragraphs synopsis. You have the makings of a FA. If I wanted to know more about him, I would be well served by reading this. Here's what to do - tidy it up, let it simmer for awhile, ask some well-placed advice from other Biography mavens and then put it up for FA. You get a star by your name if you do, and you deserve one. udv. István 18:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Your copyedits are much appreciated, as is the advice. To reply to your points:

• I was afraid that the section about his books rambled a bit, although I want to make sure to keep enough of it in. Especially in Szigeti on the Violin, he reveals a lot about his personal philosophy of music and violin playing, which (in my opinion)is very important for his biography. That said, I will try trimming it down.
• Yes, he was indeed married to the same woman for all those years, and as far as I can tell their marriage was a very happy and harmonious one. There are some nice vignettes of their life together in his autobiography, maybe I'll try to work in a few mentions of domestic life somewhere.

I had a good laugh at your remark about how I should get academic credit for this, especially because just a few days ago, my obnoxious Music History professor bellowed "Don't ever look up anything on Wikipedia if you expect to stay in this class! WIKIPEDIA SUCKS ROCKS!!" after which everyone burst out laughing and I sat fuming. :)

Anyway, thanks again, you are very helpful and much appreciated as usual! :-) K. Lásztocska 21:48, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

You had a music history professor who actually said that? Did she/he name any specific articles? Enquiring minds want to know ... seeing as I write hundreds of them. That's a little bit disturbing. Antandrus (talk) 04:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

No, nothing specific, just your basic professorial bandwagon of Wikipedia-bashing. :-) K. Lásztocska^talk 05:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Wanda Ostrowska

We say she was of Russian parentage, and that info appears elsewhere on the web, yet her surname looks more like Polish or Czech. The female counterpart of the Russian surname Ostrovsky is Ostrovskaya (or, in German transliteration, Ostrowskaja). Anybody know for sure? -- JackofOz 08:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I know, it's a Polish name. However, according to Szigeti himself in his own memoirs, she was Russian. K. Lásztocska 14:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

snap review

I don't think it's ready for FAC. (dont take it personally) This is a biography of the man, not just his legacy or significance to music. I would expect his family and personal life be covered more as many people researching him would be slightly disappointed at this point.

The lead is just a little too fawning and bare - it seems there is missing a concise statement as to why he has achieved the notoriety he did. The verbiage (if you ignore the specifics like "violin" and "Hungarian") could be equally applicable to many musicians. I think its fair game to mention Bartók and Stokowski in the lead as they are known to the English-speaking masses, at least those with a modicum of education or culture. (you don't want to bore the pants off your audience)(I suppose that depends on the audience)

Early life - very well presented - only some trimming needed, and the prodigy paragraph needs a reference. Also what is meant by "the Academy"? Is it Hubay's studio? Im going to just stop right here. I get carried away sometimes doing this and it all seems overwhelming in the end and the one thing you should know is that this page is well written and on its way to FAC. Right now I have to give something else the right-of-way. István 16:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Items as I find them

Grove has 19 Feb as his date of death. Did the New York Times give the 20th as the date of death, or was that the date the obituary ran? Antandrus (talk) 04:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Yikes. Yikes yikes yikes. You're totally right, it was the 19th. Thanks for catching that one, that's an utter howler...K. Lásztocska^talk 04:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome.  :) Good article! Antandrus (talk) 05:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Jewish

Is it really necessary to mention his religion in the lead, along with nationality? I have some objections to doing so:

• First of all, in his own autobiography he never mentions his religion or that of his family, leading me to believe it was not a central part of his life (i.e. he may have been of Jewish heritage but not observant.)
• Which leads me to my second point, the official status of the Jews in Hungary at that time. Unlike in many other Eastern European countries, "Jewish" was not considered an ethnicity but only a religion--i.e. Szigeti would not have been officially classified as "a Jew" but rather "a Hungarian of the Mosaic faith."

I'm open to counter-arguments, but I think it's important enough that it's something that should be discussed. K. Lásztocska^talk 21:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Since you ask...I don't think the point is significant enough for the lead, not in the English Wikipedia. If he were vegetarian, diabetic, etc. it would not belong in the lead either. As you well know, the irony is that it would be more remarkable for a 20th Century European top world-class violinist to *not* have been Jewish. But unlike central Europeans, English speaking readers will not associate religion/ethnicity with and individual's virtuosity or significance, especially in a field which is objectively seen as pan-cultural (orchestral music/violin). We may prefer our reggae artists to be Jamaican but will listen to anyone pick up a violin and play Brahms if they can do it well - ethnicity aside. Alas, poor Europe does not always see it the same way and often insists on tagging the Jewish practitioner. But this is EnWiki and putting the religion in the lead is putting too fine a point on it.István (talk) 15:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Generally, ethnicity (and ethnicity/religion in this case), unlike nationality, should not be included in lead paragraphs. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies). Dahn (talk) 23:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Now it is not written anywhere that he was Jewish, except for the categories. bogdan (talk) 13:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

I myself pointed that out to KL on the FAC page. I should add that I never viewed this as a major problem for the article, but, if it is a fact (and it probably is), some mention of it should eventually be made in the text. Also: it is quite common that users who were not involved in editing the article check the inclusion into categories against what the text says, so the categories may be removed altogether if not backed by a mention in the text. Presumably, this detail is already used in one of the sources used? If not, I'm sure a reliable source could be found to attest his Jewishness.

At the time I was writing my first post in this section, I had not noticed that the link for his nationality led to Hungarian people. This, per the same convention I cited before, would only be applicable to some articles, and they would be the exception to the rule. Meaning that the link for "Hungarian" should be to "Hungary", regardless of whether the subject of the article was Hungarian or Jewish - his citizenship takes priority over the ethnicity, and the ethnicity is usually mentioned in the body of text. In this case, I might suggest: "Szigeti was born Joseph "Jóska" Singer<ref>Campbell, p. 159</ref> to a [[History of the Jews in Hungary|Jewish]] [or, alternatively, [[History of the Jews in Hungary|Jewish Hungarian]]] family<add reference> in Budapest, Austria-Hungary." I personally tend making links for "Jewish" to the regional subchapters, because they are more precise than Jewish, and because, technically, the "History of the Jews in x country" is the equivalent of "xian Jewish" (see Hungarian Jewish). These are just suggestions, and, let me add, none of the issues they answer to makes this article less of a gem. Dahn (talk) 13:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

The thing is, I didn't even know he was Jewish until somebody added that category. I guess if his birth family name was "Singer" he probably was, but I hadn't come across mention of it in any other sources. I didn't want to delete the category because I would then a) look like an antisemite and b) be removing what could well be a perfectly true fact. Does anyone have a source for this whole Jewish thing? K. Lásztocska^talk 16:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Here's what I could find: the editor's response to a query in Time, according to which "Hungarian-born Joseph Szigeti, 50, famed "violinist's violinist" and ardent Benny Goodman fan, is also Jewish"; page 4 of an YIVO article (note: the text does not have page numbers, so I'm going by the Acrobat count). These should come in handy for references, in case you want to add them to the text, or I could add them myself if you should want me to do it. Dahn (talk) 18:32, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Certainly, in a century when a group of infamous ultra killers proposed the total anihilation of all jews, when the people of Germany agreed with that mayhem and lot of people of other countries cooperated strongly with the extermination, making it posible, well, no matter if jewishness is a religion or an ethnicity, it really had to cross his entire life. Is almost sure that members of his family were killed on an awfull way. It´s almost imposible that he didn´t have to run for his life to avoid be part of that massacre. How can anyone believe that the fact of being jewish on Europe at the first half of the twenty century can be omited because is a minor clue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.19.48.231 (talk) 10:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

References format

I took the liberty of editing the references in part. I listed the references that are cited several times in the text in a final section on references, and introduced them only by name and page/chapter in the Notes section. This is what is generally used, and I think it is for the best: when you mention a reference by its full name in the first citation and by name and page in subsequent citation, you may make it very hard for editors to move parts of the text around, or may end up with a mess (for example, editors may forget to change the references accordingly when moving text or adding more from a source, which means that the full name of the reference in a citation may end after the shortened form in another citation). It is also much easier to follow. Dahn (talk) 23:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, your work is much appreciated. I'm horrible with MoS stuff... :) K. Lásztocska^talk 04:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't mention it. I'm glad I added my small contribution to a superb article. Dahn (talk) 08:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect birthday date and birth place, etc.?

According to the "Zsido Lexikon" (Jewish Lexicon, 1929)(Hung., under: [1] ), Szigeti was born on 2 September in Sighet (Maramarossziget), Transsylvania and not in Budapest. The sources in this Wikipedia article are probably taken from Szigeti´s autobiography (1947), which is unfortunately not always reliable. Another "mistake" is the statement that his Jewish name was "Singer"; his Jewish name was actually "Schachter", see: [2]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jejugi (talk • contribs) 21:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

The second source comes from so many unidentified sources - how do you know it is accurate? What date is it supposed to refer to - 1939? I didn't think Szigeti was living in Sighet then.Parkwells (talk) 20:51, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Szigeti is my family. That's the reason why I know that the source [3] is correct. The source's author does not claim that he is referring to the year 1939. Szigeti is a cousin of my grandmother. According to her, Szigeti never kept contact with the family. That explains a lot. Anyway, he had at least one brother, Samu Schachter (also figuring in the same source) who was a pianist. Szigeti had other renowned musicians as cousins: e.g. Marcell Gal (born Gottlieb) who was the first violinist in the Bucharest philharmonic orchestra, often giving solo concerts especially in the 30-ies. He died in the Holocaust.Jejugi (talk) 23:33, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Main page appearance

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on March 11, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 11, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director, Raul654 (talk · contribs). If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 03:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Joseph Szigeti (1892 – 1973) was a Hungarian virtuoso violinist. Born into a musical family, he spent his early childhood in a small town in Transylvania. He quickly proved himself to be a child prodigy on the violin, and moved to Budapest with his father to study with the renowned pedagogue Jenő Hubay. After completing his studies with Hubay in his early teens, Szigeti began his international concert career. His concertizing at that time was primarily limited to salon-style recitals and the more overtly virtuosic repertoire; however, after making the acquaintance of pianist Ferruccio Busoni, he began to develop a much more thoughtful and intellectual approach to music that eventually earned him the nickname "The Scholarly Virtuoso". From the 1920s until 1960, Szigeti performed regularly around the world and recorded extensively. He also distinguished himself as a strong advocate of new music, and was the dedicatee of many new works by contemporary composers. Among the more notable pieces written for him are Ernest Bloch's Violin Concerto, Bartók's Rhapsody No. 1, and Eugène Ysaÿe's Solo Sonata No. 1. After retiring from the concert stage in 1960, he worked at teaching and writing until his death in 1973, at the age of 80. (more...)

ouch

The "word" concertizing appears in the lead, and is therefore due to appear on the Main Page tomorrow. At best it is an Americanism, so contrary to WP:VNE, at worst possibly the ugliest example I have ever seen of the neologistic tendency to turn a noun into a verb so that it can be turned into another noun. Does it have any real linguistic or semantic advantage over the much simpler His performances at that time were primarily... or His concerts at that time were primarily... ? As it is, it makes my eyes bleed, and I am unhappificated saddened by the prospect of its appearance on the Main Page. I have changed the lead to my "performance" example: that word is considered good enough to appear 7 times in the body of the article, where concertizize and its derivatives are happily absent. Kevin McE (talk) 07:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations, you've achieved a great victory. Florestanová (talk) 01:18, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Capitalization

Is the CAPS used in the References section necessary? --Another Believer _(Talk) 00:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Joska and Wanda.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Joska and Wanda.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:08, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Illness and new beginnings

Many years ago I read in the liner notes to one or another of Szigeti's recordings that his tuberculosis caused the permanent partial collapse of one of his lungs, and after his recovery, he had to hold his violin and bow at an unusual angle. Might anyone have any further information about this? Milkunderwood (talk) 07:05, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Oops - duplicated below; I had forgotten this older post. Milkunderwood (talk) 09:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Infobox

I just readded the infobox to this article. It is a helpful and beneficial addition to this featured article and in no way goes against our guidelines or policies. Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical music/Style guidelines#Biographical infoboxes is no longer a prohibition against such infoboxes, although the most powerful editors in the WikiProject still seek to needlessly eliminate infoboxes from all classical music biographies. ThemFromSpace 01:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

In any case, I think that there is no requirement for an infobox for FAs. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:52, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

And conversely some of the most powerful editors in the WikiProject still seek to needlessly add infoboxes to all classical music biographies. - SchroCat (talk) 19:07, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

A list of recordings

One of the most interesting piece of information I expected to find here was a (so far non existent) list - as comprehensive as possible - of Szigeti recordings. This would be really interesting and useful. Ptyxs (talk) 08:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

"Szigeti held the bow in an old-fashioned way..."

I have read, but no longer have any idea where - surely in one or another CD insert or LP jacket notes - that Szigeti did not make a "full" recovery from his tuberculosis, but suffered a permanently partially-collapsed lung; and that it was this condition that forced him to hold his violin and bow in an awkward position. If this is correct, surely it ought to be verifiable somewhere.

CD Biddulph Recordings LAB 070-71 (C)&(P)1993, enclosed booklet: "Program notes by Bill Newman":

• "Szigeti's poor health directly affected his technique. He had contracted tuberculosis in 1913 and moved to Davos, Switzerland, in order to take a cure. In those days the standard if rather drastic treatment was to collapse a lung. Even afterwards the resulting weakness in Szigeti's arm muscles forced him to adopt a distinctive arched posture holding his elbows clamped close to his sides, leading some commentators to suggest that he looked like someone playing the violin in a telephone booth. Then, sadly, late in life, diabetes took over, and he developed a tremulous impairment of tone. The power and vision of Szigeti's interpretations however remained unaltered as comparisons of his early, middle and late recordings prove."

Milkunderwood (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

I note that above, a request for a list of Szigeti's recordings is made. That would certainly be worthwhile adding to the article, if anyone has the time and is willing to make the effort. My own amateur feeling about Szigeti's playing is that he was foremost a musician as opposed to being technically "correct" in his playing - you can always hear his emotional response in his interpretations of what he is playing. This can sound strange and perhaps even arbitrary to listeners accustomed to modern factory-trained violinists who prize literal accuracy above all else. One recording in particular that I have to listen to from time to time is his Schubert Fantasie in C, D.934, Sei mir gegrüßt! (1949), which puts all other renditions to shame - he pours his heart out. This is out of print now, but a few copies are still available here and perhaps from some other sources. The CD includes the Sonatina No. 1 in D, D.384 (1942), and the Rondeau brillant in b, D.895 (1952), both of which are equally amazing. (If anyone might decide to jump for a copy, I'd be interested in seeing your reaction posted here.) Milkunderwood (talk) 09:33, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Hollywood Canteen

Szigeti appeared in the 1944 film Hollywood Canteen where he played "Die Biene (The Bee), Op.13 No.9" (1856) by François Schubert. He also played "Souvenir" (1906) by Frantisek Drdla as a duet with the violin playing comedian Jack Benny. MBG 58.105.56.0 (talk) 11:08, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph Szigeti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207104826/http://www.andante.com/article/article.cfm?id=16698 to http://www.andante.com/article/article.cfm?id=16698

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

WP:URFA/2020

I'm reviewing this for the FA sweeps going on at WP:URFA/2020. There are three things concerning with this one related to the featured article criteria. First, there is substantial uncited text in various places, and second, we are relying very heavily on the subject's biography. Lastly, the reception section overuses lengthy direct quotes. This article will likely need a featured article review if these issues are not addressed. Hog Farm _Talk 06:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)