Talk:Lancaster Canal Tramroad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment[edit]

This article lacks inline citation and fails the B-1 criteria. See WP:BCLASS NtheP (talk) 09:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nthep, I respectfully disagree with your assessment and until it has been established by common consensus, I have removed the tag from the page.
The article does contain inline references - in fact I believe it is well and accurately referenced - it has a consistent style incorporating Harvard Referencing which is a style well recognised in the community. It does not include numeric notations, but if you refer to WP:BCLASS (Part 1) and to WP:Citing_sources#Parenthetical referencing you will see that this is included in the concept of "inline references". Regards Oxonhutch (talk) 18:06, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oxonhutch, thank you for pointing out my error. I did mean to apply a tag but not that one. The one I meant was {{unreferenced-section}} for the section on Decline & closure. A deficiency, I believe, enough for an article to fail a B-class assessment. Yours NtheP (talk) 18:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stretton 1893[edit]

I have reverted the removal of the above reference and linked it to a copy on the web. An uncorroborated statement that he was a 'notorious hoaxer' is no grounds for a summary removal of this reference. I invite you to read his commentary and compare it with that of the other references quoted (that I have located in libraries, or are in my personal collection) - and please discuss where his veracity is questioned, and how that relates to his version of history in respect to the tramroad. Regards Oxonhutch (talk) 12:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lancaster Canal Tramroad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]