Jump to content

Talk:Leszynski naming convention

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name

[edit]

Who is this Leszynski that (presumably) came up with this notation? » Christopher | Talk | 08:42, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

 Stan Leszynski, who is a database design consultant.  http://www.leszynski.com
 Mike Simpson 14:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disadvantages

[edit]

I've added a "Disadvantages" section. I've wikilinked Case Sensitivity for "mixedCase" but is there a better wikilink than that? I tried "mixed case" literally but that went straight to Capitalization which didn't seem such a good match. (Northernhenge (talk) 21:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC))[reply]

How about CamelCase? Classical geographer (talk) 07:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's spot on. I'd never heard of that term before. Thank you. Northernhenge (talk) 10:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advantages

[edit]

The noted advantage of the database being self-documenting is not true.

One of the objectives of self-documenting code is for it to be readable, which Hungarian notation and thereby Leszynski notation is not according to [1]

Jespertp (talk) 07:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ * Jones, Derek M. (2009). The New C Standard: A Cultural and Economic Commentary (PDF). Addison-Wesley. p. 727. ISBN 0-201-70917-1.