Talk:Liberal rebellions of 1842
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jgriffith19. Peer reviewers: A blinka, RyanF20.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Liberal rebellions of 1842 (Empire of Brazil). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131216084758/http://ccla.org.br/vendagrande/ to http://www.ccla.org.br/vendagrande/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Cleanup Proposal
[edit]One of the overall areas I intend to improve is source diversity, as the current article relies heavily on a few sources to present its information. I will do this by adding substance to each section in small amounts from the sources I find to help enrich the content. I think this addition fits well into the first pillar of Wikipedia, as by adding more information generally to the article it will enrich its usefulness as an encyclopedia. Another area I would like to add to the article is what effects that the Liberal Rebellions had, what political changes may have occurred or reactions as a result of the rebellions. Also, I plan on adding additional background information to further contextualize the events of the rebellions. The sources for this topic are sparse, but I believe if I really scrutinize them I can improve this article.
Bethell, Leslie. Brazil: Empire and Republic, 1822-1930. Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Bieber, Judy. “When Liberalism Goes Local: Nativism and Partisan Identity in the Sertão Mineiro, Brazil, 1831-1850.” Luso-Brazilian Review 37, no. 2 (2000): 75–93.
Brown, Rose. American Emperor,Dom Pedro II of Brazil,. New York, 1945. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015049860078.
Burns, E. Bradford. A History of Brazil: New York Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press, 1993. https://doi.org/10.7312/burn07954.
Mosher, Jeffrey C. Political Struggle, Ideology, and State Building: Pernambuco and the Construction of Brazil, 1817-1850. U of Nebraska Press, 2008.
Palmer, Thomas W. “São Paulo and the Republican Movement in Brazil.” The Americas 8, no. 1 (1951): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/978024.
Schwarcz, Lilia Moritz, and John Gledson. The Emperor’s Beard: Dom Pedro II and the Tropical Monarchy of Brazil. 1st American ed. New York: Hill and Wang, 2004.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgriffith19 (talk • contribs) 01:03, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Comments on Cleanup Proposal
[edit]Hello! I think you are off to a great start in your plans to expand the article and enrich its current content. The sources that you have listed in your preliminary bibliography are good, but I would continue researching to add even more. The listed sources appear to be good for your proposed section on background, and there are a couple that are more politically oriented, but I would focus on finding more on the political aftermath. Also, while political changes are good, interesting, and important, perhaps see if there are scholars who note other social or economic changes or reactions to the rebellions. Again, you are off to a great start and your plan seems manageable and in line with Wikipedia standards. I look forward to your edits. A blinka (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you! These are some great suggestions for finding more information on this topic, as the info does seem somewhat sparse. I'm also looking at information on the major figures associated with this event in hopes of gleaning more information. Jgriffith19 (talk) 18:49, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Draft comments
[edit]The page is great! I added a few wikilinks, but overall I think you covered the topic well and fleshed out the story nicely while maintaining a neutral tone. The only other thing that might be useful is to look at the Portuguese page and translate it to see what other authors are saying on the same topic. Best, A blinka (talk) 00:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, a blinka! I took a look at the translated version of the Portuguese article and found some additional information; however, the sources are also in Portuguese. Jgriffith19 (talk) 14:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)