This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Eric Lerner's entry marked with "His level of expertise is controversial" with a link to a page of complaints by astrophysicists? Even if those are indeed errors (which is not a given), last I checked this was a list of plasma physicists, not of astrophysicists. Since no plasma physicist mentions any errors on his part in the field of plasma physics, that sentence must be removed, together with the link. (And even if one makes a wild assumption of him making errors in the field of plasma physics, of which I'm unaware, this is no grounds to blackmouth someone's level of expertise. All scientists make mistakes every now and then. Otherwise, we would have never seen multiple hypotheses formulated on the same subject.) Leokor (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
