Talk:Mallika Chopra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

prod[edit]

I've started cleaning up this article, I've added a couple of references already - but still does not assert notability. I will fix it up within the next week. Any help is welcome! - Ozzykhan 20:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Found some good third party verifiable sources that should be included in article:
All American Speakers
CNN interview transcript
Already included: UNICEF USA -- Ozzykhan 20:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a Forbes article from Jan 2001 - I saw that here and there's an alumni piece from Kellogg[1]- so why not deprod it now? --Mereda 12:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well you just have to add the Frobes reference into the article. I had the Kellogg one in there until someone changed it up and removed it in the process. - Ozzykhan 15:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reads as standard marketing put out by I guess her blog. It is her father that is notable Deepak the kids try to gain notability by association. While people have not decided she is notable will take away the stuff which is not established. Smalltinsquirrel (talk) 09:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and I just noticed her big claim to fame IntentBlog doesn't exist. A lady who is chasing the starlight with a vengeance I see Smalltinsquirrel (talk) 09:55, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Deepak Chopra and UNICEF references need to go out. I Dont know how Smalltinsquirrel (talk) 10:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Removed speedy. Regardless as to her father is, she has been the subject of articles in such WP:RS's as The Boston Globe, The Los Angeles Times (pay article), and The Times of India, to name just a few. Given that, this article can't be summarily deleted. If prod'er wishes to pursue, I really believe this needs to go the WP:AfD route. 74.69.39.11 (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • The way it looks, the person cannot be notable. I suggest to write what you wrote above (the links) into the article. Her father should come later in the article once she is proved to be notable. Did you see the dead link in the article?? Update or remove it. There are hundreds of thousands who are superior to her in the field and they are not on Wikipedia!!! --Athos, Porthos, and Aramis (talk) 23:00, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Athos, Porthos, and Aramis (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--As for Articles for Deletion status, whoever placed that notice failed to create an entry for this article on the Articles for Deletion section, as should have been done, so there's no space there for users to comment on the merits of deletion. As for whether or not the subject is worthy of an entry, if the criterion is that the article be useful to users, then the article should be kept. I looked up the article for more information on the subject after seeing her discussed (on her own merits, with no mention of her father) in the New York Times. As Google comes up with half a million results for "Mallika Chopra," it seems she's got enough of a presence in the world that a lot of people may want more information about her--the article is useful. Even the basic information now given, that she's a writer about family, etc., gave me more information than I had before and was useful to me, though of course a bit more would be helpful. The offense the previous poster apparently takes at the presence of this article (the authoritative "cannot," hyperbole and triple exclamation points) is so out of proportion that it suggests the writer is upset about something that's got nothing to do with the article. I've got no ax to grind here: I came to this article because I'd never heard of the subject until I saw her quoted in the Times and wanted to know who she was. 118.243.151.151 (talk) 06:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ UNICEF USA http://www.unicefusa.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=duLRI8O0H&b=1343323&ct=639447

Explosion of Citations[edit]

Whatever the status of deletion, while here we should try to polish this page up. The last sentence in the main paragraph has an insane burst of citations. This should be cleaned up and the sources either pared down or distributed to their correct places, but I wanted to first check if someone had a reason for 16 citations to be listed after one sentence?

She also blogs for Beliefnet and Huffington Post.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]

The Cap'n (talk) 15:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Khurana, Suanshu (24 February 2009). "Child's Play". Indian Express. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  2. ^ West, Nancy Shohet (29 May 2007). "Her kids' questions helped reveal answers". Boston Globe. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  3. ^ "Former Times Publisher Named CEO of Chopra Site". Los Angeles Times. 29 July 2000. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  4. ^ Sharma, Gitanjali (11 March 2007). "A mother's word". The Tribune. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  5. ^ Kee, Tameka (24 October 2008). "Chopra's Daughter, Ex Yahoo Exec Launch Lifestyle Site". Washington Post. Retrieved 4 February 2010.
  6. ^ "Discussion with Mallika Chopra; Cheating 101". CNN. 6 May 2005. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  7. ^ Walia, Nonu (30 December 2007). "Savage nobles". Times of India. Retrieved 6 February 2010. [dead link]
  8. ^ Salkin, Allen (18 September 2009). "Seeing Yourself in Their Light". New York Times. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  9. ^ Dickerson, Marla (13 December 1999). "Whiz kids shun MBAs to jump on dot.com bandwagon". Pittsburg Post-Gaze. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  10. ^ Chaudhry, Lakshmi (8 May 2009). "The false promises of mommy lit". Livemint. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  11. ^ "A promising account". The Hindu. 24 May 2009. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  12. ^ "Mallika Chopra profile in Huffington Post". Huffington Post. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  13. ^ Khan, Asim (20 March 2009). "Tough queries". The Hindu. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  14. ^ "Transcript : Deepak Chopra Discusses His Mystical Life". CNN. 27 January 2001. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  15. ^ Times News Network (29 June 2009). "Grace was under pressure: Mallika". Times of India. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  16. ^ "Mallika Chopra profile at TechCrunch". crunchbase.com. Retrieved 10 February 2010.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mallika Chopra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mallika_Chopra&oldid=1206674505"