Talk:Matthew Hoggard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

i love Matthew Hoggard,he's the best!Is he single?Thats the question thats burning on every female's mind in the caribbean,specifically Trinidad.

'Cracking'[edit]

I'm not sure 'a cracking cover drive' is entirely objective. It was, after all, a full toss from Brett Lee. Shouldn't this be changed to something a bit more neutral such as a 'rare' or 'well-executed' cover drive? JP 19:00, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For a batsman of his standard, and considering the high pressure situation, and against a guy bowling at 90 mph + it was a cracking cover drive.

It's all POV, I have just changed it to "a cover drive". In the long run I doubt it is too significant. SGGH speak! 17:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swing[edit]

Sorry but this quote is just utter rubbish "If, due to pitch or atmospheric conditions, the new ball does not swing he can be ineffective." Hoggard has shown on the subcontinent that he can take wickets without tons of swing, you don't become one of the best bowlers in the world by being one dimensional. UncleTheOne


It's not entirely rubbish, it's just out of date. It would have been accurate to say that about him a few years ago, but he has proved with his performances in the subcontinent and australia that he can take wickets in any conditions (the section that mentions his 7/109 in Adelaide hints at this). Perhaps it could be modified to reflect his improvement in this aspect of his bowling.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 23:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New BBC article[edit]

Various things in this article that might be useable, in particular Hoggard's anger at the way he was treated after being dropped by England and some off-field stuff. Loganberry (Talk) 22:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matthew Hoggard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matthew Hoggard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]