This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
I've moved it now. Nobody else expressed any opinion, and the NRHP listings for this and the Warehouse use an ampersand. (Even the NRHP plaque for the Warehouse uses one, as your photo shows.) I find nothing in the Wikipedia Manual of Style for article titles about avoiding ampersands. They are to be avoided in titles of articles about railroads, but I believe that was only because there are so many railroad companies with ampersands in their names, there was strong desire that titles of articles about them use a consistent format on that point. For various non-railway subjects, I don't see any inconsistency in using an ampersand in the title, and so if the official name uses one (as is the case here), there's no reason we shouldn't. SJ Morg (talk) 06:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]