Talk:Michigan–Notre Dame football rivalry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fielding Yost Hiatus[edit]

This article seems to be biased. It completely disregards major elements of the rivalry, mostly related to Michigan's (i.e., Fielding Yost's) rift with Notre Dame and proposed blackballing of the Notre Dame football team by the current Big Ten member schools because of anti-Catholic and anti-immigration sentiments. Leaving this out of the article leaves it unbelievably skewed, and while I haven't had the opportunity to dig through the histories, it appears that the article originally contained this part before being vandalized. --Cmm85 (talk) 20:37, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cessation Section[edit]

There has been an edit done and undone in the section. I partially agree with the original undo, but the stated reason for it is that it was unconstructive. As it stood the article implied to a casual reader the UofM had the last victory and therefore the last laugh. Since history played out differently this is at the least misleading and at worst very biased. I suggest the section either be left with a notice of the last victor, be greatly expanded, or be deleted in general. There were surely many taunts from the ND crowd on the last game of the series that could be listed as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.191.48.82 (talk) 06:56, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michigan–Notre Dame football rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Number of meetings[edit]

I think the teams have played 43, not 44 times, and least by the math reported on the profile, 25-17-1. Antidoaks (talk) 21:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think the citation for how many games have been played should mention that one game has been vacated. Antidoaks (talk) 10:48, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]