Talk:Midway Airlines (1976–1991)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Notes
[edit][and Incidents|Accidents and Incidents] Flagging as needing review. 12 years without a fatal accident is not unusual for an airline. There are no statistics given in regards to numbers of passengers per revenue mile/take-offs and landings etc to compare to other airlines. Other airlines in the US have similar safety records. Jetblue is 9 years with no accident, Southwest 35 years two fatalities (none due to airline crashes), etc. Toddself
- Todd Southwest had one fataility due to an airline crash -- the airplane in the chicago midway runway overrun hit a car that killed a young boy. —Cliffb 19:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Cliff: This is the airline Midway, not the airport. Toddself (talk) 21:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I question the accuracy of the fleet retirement information. (Planespotters is notoriously inaccurate). If the airline went bust in 1991, then why does the fleet section state different years for retirement of aircraft after 1991? I am sure there was legal issues through the bankruptcy of the airline, and that led to the planes sitting in the desert waiting new homes. However I cant cite an example of a fleet page in wiki like this. Most just cite the retirement as the last day for the airline. Thoughts? BrianFench1995 21:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Midway Airlines Routes.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Midway Airlines Routes.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.