Jump to content

Talk:Milenko Stefanović

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeMilenko Stefanović was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 14, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Untitled

[edit]

I agree. Both articles are about the same person. Andrija

Was this a serious GA nomination?

[edit]

Someone listed it on the WP:GAC page, but there was no template placed here. The article is so clearly deficient in my opinion that i'm thinking maybe someone was just making a mistake in nominating it, the reviews section is little more than a POV fluff section, there are no internal citations to demonstrate that the article actually uses its references, the lead clearly does not summarize the entire article, and even if I wanted to check the references for reliability I couldn't, as only one of them appears to be written in English. Homestarmy 05:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Failed "good article" nomination

[edit]

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of August 14, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: No, there are many manual of style irregularities " ( violin, piano and, later, clarinet).". The lead section needs to be able to stand on its own as a mini-article per WP:LEAD. Selected recordings section needs to be formatted to look better.
2. Factually accurate?: No, there are no inline citations. Only one source is in English.
3. Broad in coverage?: Education, Awards, Teaching career and Affiliation sections need to be expanded.
4. Neutral point of view?: The reviews section is unsourced bias in favor of the article subject.
5. Article stability? Yes
6. Images?: No


When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. — T Rex | talk 12:07, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why so many citations?

[edit]

It's unclear to me why there are twenty citations after many of the facts. One or two citations are quite sufficient if they verify the fact. Hopefully, this is not due to synthesis or original research, which is not permitted. Will a regular editor of the article please review and remove any excess citations. Created a further reading section if necessary. Thanks. Yworo (talk) 00:12, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have removed the obvious problem citations to web searches (not permitted) and to Blogspot and Wordpress blogs, which are typically not reliable sources. But there are still way too many citations in the article which still need to be evaluated and cleaned up. I don't read the language so I am not able to do much more. Yworo (talk) 00:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Milenko Stefanović. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Milenko Stefanović. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Milenko Stefanović. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:30, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Milenko Stefanović. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

There is a serious excess of citations and too many links in the "External links" section. Two citations for one fact should be enough. Along with the excessive promotional language, I don't see how this can be a B class article.—Anne Delong (talk) 03:49, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]