Talk:NASA wind turbines

Suggest merge

• Instead of splinters, perhaps we should combine the MOD 2 and MOD 5 articles into one NASA wind turbines article, so that we can give context and not have so many stubs. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
• Comment. Since NASA wind turbines is a new article, I would support a merge iff the new article be temporarily deleted (with its contents backed up) and the MOD-5B article (as it has more history) be moved to "NASA wind turbines" and the content re-updated there. Or simply said, perform WP:HISTMERGE. Rehman 01:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Done the text-merges. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:37, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! ( I would have done the text merging...it was the move over the redirect that needed intervention). --Wtshymanski (talk) 22:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Graphic

The same graphic appears three times. Perhaps that's a result of a merger. In any case, once is enough.   Will Beback  talk  22:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on NASA wind turbines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081231005535/http://www.awea.org/PROJECTS/projects.aspx?s=Washington to http://www.awea.org/projects/Projects.aspx?s=Washington

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)