Talk:Naiki Devi

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

India: Gujarat / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Gujarat (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup.
	This article was last assessed in June 2023.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Munshi a propagandist not a trained historian[edit]

Hello @Sajaypal007:, Yesterday I removed the source of propagandist K.M Munshi who was not a trained historian from this newly created article Special:MobileDiff/1080494692 but you reverted it today requesting to add some source for the claim, So I found a reliable source from renowned media outlet scorll.in

This “common set of traditions and practices”, as well as a “sense of continuity” – which, to Munshi, seems almost self- evident – do not seem to be so clear at all if one examines the historical citations in the book. Perhaps this is where Munshi lets his subjectivity creep in, since, in his disclaimer at the very beginning of the introduction, he states that he is not a trained historian

^[1]

106.78.41.83 (talk) 10:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Partly agree with you after reading this article but I suggest you raise this first at WP:RSN, where different viewpoint can be discussed to come at any conlclusion. Sajaypal007 (talk) 10:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Kothari, Rita Kothari & Abhijit. "KM Munshi's philosophy of Gujarati 'asmita' and a revised version of history is a familiar one today". Scroll.in. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

Edit warring for the surname of the queen[edit]

@Mohammad asfaq: and @Iamritwikaryan:, whether the surname of based on her paternity i.e. Chandela or based on marital relation i.e. Solanki (Chaulukya) should be decided on talk page rather than continuously reverting each other. Please discuss and gain consensus here before making any changes regarding the surname. Sajaypal007 (talk) 05:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earlier, in this article, surname was not even mentioned, but @Mohammad asfaq: edited the page and mentioned it everywhere. It was just mentioned that she was born into 'Chandel' family and married into 'Solanki' family. But, he didn't like it that way. So, for his information, upon marriage not only surname(family name) changes but 'gotra'(e.g. Bharadvaj, Kaundinya, Vats,etc.) changes too among Hindus (Rajputs). So, arbitrary removal and addition of contents should be stopped. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 07:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add brief history And if you want to make her Solanki, then first make Hadi Rani as Chundawat Queen and Durgavati Chandel as Kachwaha. Mohammad asfaq (talk) 06:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mohammad asfaq:, Kindly stick to the page and topic, here we are talking about Queen Naiki Devi, it has nothing to do with other Queens, you did not provide any backing to your claims and reverted to changing the goalposts,@Sajaypal007: Sir, this person has again disrupted the page without reaching any consensus or any source. I would request you to undo these and protect the page from him. Iamritwikaryan (talk) 12:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Kothari, Rita Kothari & Abhijit. "KM Munshi's philosophy of Gujarati 'asmita' and a revised version of history is a familiar one today". Scroll.in. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

[1]