User talk:Mohammad asfaq

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 13:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Hello, Mohammad asfaq, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Sajaypal007 (talk) 07:53, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Reporting Mohammad asfaq.[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Reporting Mohammad asfaq. Thank you. --Shirt58 (talk) 09:32, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to say only one thing that Parmal / Paramardideva is known because of Parmalraso, so only Parmalraso is right for that which is the contemporary source. Unnecessary edit should stop This is the page of Parmardi, here let the Gazette of Parmardi and his biography be from Parmalras only. Mohammad asfaq (talk) 15:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chandelas of Jejakabhukti. पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 18:28, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Chakravarti Samrat Parmardideva chandel.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Chakravarti Samrat Parmardideva chandel.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Parmardideva's pick is from a book named Alhakhand, which I uploaded on another page and then used it, I did not say anywhere It's my own work Mohammad asfaq (talk) 02:50, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chandelas of Jejakabhukti and Paramardi. Sajaypal007 (talk) 04:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to say one thing Do not add the sources of your claim made by the king on this page, it seems correct only on Prithviraj, this is from King Parmal's own book Parmals and other books which is historical.And this is the book of Parmal, so let it be the book of Parmal. Inscriptions claimed by Prithviraj and Prithviraj Raso were added on his page. This is of Parmardidev, here it will be told from Parmalarasi and other books of his own time. Parmal did not issue any inscriptions, but he ruled many kingdoms even after Prithviraj and his victory over Prithviraj is described in his biography of his time, Parmalaras. Prithviraj did medicine to hide his defeat, in the inscription that he defeated Ghurid 18 times in his own biography, his claims and the book will not apply to other kings, here it will be written from the book of that king because this is his page So do not add the claim of another king on this pay and do not edit it again and again. Mohammad asfaq (talk) 02:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Paramardi. Sajaypal007 (talk) 11:35, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3rr[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. पाटलिपुत्र Pat (talk) 04:34, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Samrat Parmardideva chandel.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Samrat Parmardideva chandel.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War[edit]

Hello, and Welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Paramardi & other articles. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk pages of article.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 04:06, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want to say one thing , Do not add the sources of your claim made by the king on this page, it seems correct only on Prithviraj, this is from King Parmal's own book Parmalraso and other books which is historical.And this is the book of Parmal, so let it be the book of Parmal. Inscriptions claimed by Prithviraj and Prithviraj Raso were added on his page. This is of Parmardidev, here it will be told from Parmalarasi and other books of his own time. Parmal did not issue any inscriptions, but he ruled many kingdoms even after Prithviraj and his victory over Prithviraj is described in his biography of his time, Parmalaras. Prithviraj did medicine to hide his defeat, in the inscription that he defeated Ghurid 18 times in his own biography, his claims and the book will not apply to other kings, here it will be written from the book of that king because this is his page So do not add the claim of another king on this pay and do not edit it again and again.If this is a page of Parmardi, then let it be completed from his biography of his own time, not to add someone's inscriptions and claims made on it and his imaginary Prithviraj Raso on Parmal, this is the page of Parmaal, So let Parmal's biography be edited from Parmalraso, rest you keep your Prithvirajraso on the page of Prithviraj. Mohammad asfaq (talk) 02:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 17:06, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Oz\^InterAct 17:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alha. Please stop your edit warring across multiple articles.

You must not create new versions of articles when your edits are reverted, as you have done at Paramardi-deva. bonadea contributions talk 20:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alha. Stop edit warring. bonadea contributions talk 06:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alha, Chahmanas Chandelas War, and short form references[edit]

Hi Mohammad asfaq. I came across the Alha article because of an error, and them spotted the Chahmanas Chandelas War had similar errors. When using short form refs, {{sfn}} or {{harvnb}}, you can't just add the short form and stop. They we'd to link to a full cite somewhere belse Inthe article confirming what the short form means. So I'm the Alha article you need to provide a full cite detailing what "prabodhyachandrodaya 1089" means. Similarly on the Chahmanas Chandelas War article youll need to go back and provide for referencing for all the short forms. You can see how this works on the Paramardi article. There are short refs to "R. K. Dikshit 1976", but if you look in the biography section you can see this refs to R. K. Dikshit book The Candellas of Jejākabhukti published in 1976 with an isbn of 9788170170464. This is what you need to add for each of you short form refs. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 18:07, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the sources need by Chahmanas Chandelas War. If you look at what I added it will give you an idea of what you need to do in future. - LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 18:22, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create duplicate articles to avoid content disputes, as you did at Paramardideva. Have a look at resolving content disputes instead. utcursch | talk 01:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alha, you may be blocked from editing. Tryant Saurashtrian (talk) 12:22, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Paramardi) for a period of 1 week for disruption. Please discuss content and sourcing on article talk page and achieve consensus for any changes Please make WP:EDITREQUESTs on the article's talk page. Please seek dispute resolution as needed.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Wikipedia[edit]

Mohammad asfaq, when you make edits to a Wikipedia article and other editors revert you, you can not keep restoring your own edits over and over again. Instead, you need to go to the article talk page (Talk:Paramardi, Talk:Alha, etc) and explain why you think your edits should be kept. Do not restore your edits unless you get agreement from other editors. Please read this page about how to handle situations where there is disagreement about article content.

In addition, you cannot create new versions of articles, with the text you want. Such articles will be redirected or deleted. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 19:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Parmal Raso[edit]

Parmal Raso and Alha-Khand can not be used as sources for historical facts in Wikipedia articles. They are at least partly fictional, and written to glorify the people described in the poems, such as Paramardi and Alha. There are scholarly books and journal articles about Parmal Raso, Alha-Khand, and similar works. Wikipedia can use those books as sources for facts, but not the ballads themselves. --bonadea contributions talk 09:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mohammad asfaq. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 09:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for continued disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 10:22, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammad asfaq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just added sources from contemporary gazzeteer and books Mohammad asfaq (talk) 12:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your edit warring or unreliable sourcing. Yamla (talk) 13:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Permalink to ANI for patrolling admin - here. Black Kite (talk) 13:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Qarachil expedition on Kumaon moved to draftspace[edit]

Tagged for dubious accuracy, author indeffed for disruptive editing

Multiple accounts[edit]

FTR, edits by User:Digvijay Mishra 99 (created right after Mohammad asfaq's partial block) are virtually identical to those of Mohammad asfaq. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur.

Mohammad asfaq, you are not allowed to create new accounts to get around your block. --bonadea contributions talk 22:02, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akshay Singh Rajput Thakur. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]