Jump to content

Talk:Okama Report

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk13:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that a Japanese LGBT rights group protested the 1989 manga series Okama Report for what it argued were its stereotypical and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? Source: 1 2
    • ALT1:... that reprinted editions of the 1989 manga series Okama Report contain a postscript from an LGBT rights group noting that the series contains exaggerated and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? Source: 1 2

Created by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • It's defo not long enuf once you cut out the uncited synopsis plus the parts that only refer to primary sources. Apart from the OCCUR controversy, I'm not sure if it actually meets notability guidelines, so it looks like more work needs to be done to demonstrate the subject's notability. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Prose length is not an issue, regardless of whether the Synopsis section is included or not. Sourcing is an issue. feminist (talk) wear a mask, you stupid bastards 03:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]