Talk:Opeth discography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listOpeth discography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 25, 2008Featured list candidatePromoted


New album and release date redundancy[edit]

I noticed Opeth's new album and release date are mentioned at the end of the first and third paragraphs. Is that necessary? Larphenflorp (talk) 05:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opeth compilations[edit]

How come there are no compilations that opeth has appeared on? I bet there's a bajillion. Maybe I answered my own question. Maybe. Leitmotiv (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bleak is not a music video[edit]

Bleak is just a promo video, exact footage from the dvd The Roundhouse Tapes. It doesn't count as a music video, just for mtv. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.155.104.252 (talk) 19:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Had you used the edit summary to say this the first time, I wouldn't have reverted you. :) Nymf hideliho! 14:58, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Box Set[edit]

The 2006 box set has been known by two different titles in various places on Wikipedia: either as simply "Opeth Box Set" or as "Collecter's Edition Slipcase" which is the large caption on the box cover. Neither of these seems really adequate to me but the second is more descriptive. That is also the current title of the relevant album article, after some other editors discussed the same confusion at that article's talk page. Therefore I have changed all references around Wikipedia to "Collecter's Edition Slipcase" for consistency. This is probably not ideal and arguments could be made for using "Opeth Box Set" throughout WP as well. In any case, this is the correct place for discussing the matter. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit wars[edit]

There is an ongoing dispute between myself and User:DingirXul. I have tried confronting him or her via their talk page, but my edits were reverted once again without a response. Cathartica (talk) 10:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's worth noting that Blabbermouth is not published by Roadrunner Records, it's simply hosted by Roadrunner. Also Rovi is the publisher of allmusic - allmusic isn't a publisher, it's a website. 'UK Charts' isn't a publisher either. We really need some clue as to why the changes were made and reverted - it's a big diff and presumably every aspect of the change isn't controversial? Are there some parts of the edit that you can agree on but specific parts that you can't?--Michig (talk) 07:17, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that Allmusic isn't the publisher and that it's Rovi Corporation. Same with the UK Charts / Charts Stats ref. That wasn't me. My edits actually fixed those errors and the other guy reverted them back to how they were, which however did have Roadrunner Records as the publisher rather than Blabbermouth.net. All of them should be correct now. Not sure about the new UK ref for Zobbel. Cathartica (talk) 17:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reverting again while this discussion is ongoing isn't a good idea. If there are any further reverts someone's likely to get blocked.--Michig (talk) 17:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He just reverted my edits again, without any reason, so I'm just gonna leave it at that. Cathartica (talk) 01:11, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Questions - What is the particular content dispute? What are the two positions? What sources are available that are relevant? The discussion above in this RfC is too vague, and focusing too much on behavior. An RfC should focus on specific content issues (what material to put in the article, how to word it, etc). --Noleander (talk) 20:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

This article may be a featured list, but I really think somebody who has a way with words should completely rewrite the lead. Regards. 81.83.142.134 (talk) 18:43, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Opeth discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:19, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Opeth discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Opeth discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Opeth discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Opeth_discography&oldid=1209530779"