Talk:Opinion polling for the 2017 Czech parliamentary election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Hi Bedivere, I think this information was better as part of the original article with the other information about the election. Without the data the main election article is very short.. Jdcooper (talk) 22:33, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, well the election is getting closer so the articcle will get longer. When I created this article, I was inspired by similar approach for Croatian or United Kingdom elections. --Bedivere.cs (talk) 11:08, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I have seen those type of articles for sure, and if the article was very long I would certainly support it, but at the moment I think anyone going to the election article would probably be looking for opinion poll data. (I say this as one of those people!) Jdcooper (talk) 21:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

graphical summary[edit]

How would we go about getting an updated graphical summary of the polls? This one only goes up to April.. Jdcooper (talk) 18:18, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Figures for regional elections[edit]

Howcome these percentage figures don't add up to 100?? Jdcooper (talk) 06:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We in Czech Republic got many local parties joining the elections, but they will not join general elections or they will support some of the national parties, the strongest national-regional is STAN-about 3% of regional voting, but others are mostly one-region parties like party Mayors for "Liberecký kraj" (name of one of the districts on north), which even win elections in this district. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.153.49.236 (talk) 18:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right, thanks! Jdcooper (talk) 00:36, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible vandalism?[edit]

I noticed this edit which looked odd to me. Why should an unregistered user be editing old figures like this without comment? I didn't want to change it back because the link to the survey results has expired but I feel like it could be vandalism. What does anyone else think? Jdcooper (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the IP was trying to add the "6" under the column for the Greens as opposed to the Pirates. Here's the original source, which does project 6 seats for the Greens. Mélencron (talk) 22:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, good stuff. Sorry IP, I misjudged you! Jdcooper (talk) 22:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]