Jump to content

Talk:Oskar Schindler/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 04:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Comments

[edit]
  • I've read this through, verified the references, and checked the image copyright status. I find the article is comprehensive, very well written and thoroughly referenced, and meets all GA standards. Excellent work! - Lemurbaby (talk) 04:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good gravy. This is my first one to pass without needing any tweeks. Thanks for taking the time to do the review. Best, -- Diannaa (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]