Talk:Ouranosaurus

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The tone of this article does not even begin to approach that of Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. While this could be a worthy article, it will need a lot of cleaning up. If this is not done, the article will probably be a candidate for deletion.--Alabamaboy 8 July 2005 20:35 (UTC)

This article is about 99% one-sided, except for the few sources supporting the YE view. Even the language ("100% failed miserably", etc.) is belittling. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. --Vizcarra 01:56, 14 July 2005 (UTC) [reply]

Untitled[edit]

I just removed both a VFD and a 'speedy delete' marker from this article. It seems that these were both related to previous versions of the article, in which it was largely about Young Earth Creationism and not about this dinosaur at all. Since the article seems to me to be relatively sensible now, I've removed both markers. I hope that's OK. DJ Clayworth 19:43, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is. thank you!

What does the name mean?[edit]

Can someone please add a note about the meaning of the name? SpectrumDT 23:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hadrosaur?[edit]

I don't follow ornithopods very closely, but all the phylogenies I've seen put Ouranosaurus outside of Hadrosauria, contrary to this article. (Closer to hadrosaurs than to Iguanodon, fair enough, but not inside Hadrosauria itself.) Albertonykus (talk) 14:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, Hadrosauroidea appears to be more inclusive than Hadrosauria. Albertonykus (talk) 08:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ouranosaurus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050906212738/http://library.thinkquest.org/26615/ouranosaurus.htm to http://library.thinkquest.org/26615/ouranosaurus.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]