Talk:OutThere
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 February 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
No CoI
[edit]Editor/writer has no affiliation whatsoever with the topics or persons connected with Out There magazine. I have an interest in UK magazine publishing and noted this topic was missing The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 09:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- The image is photographed by me, with copies of OutThere I own The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 22:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Image used
[edit]I originally uploaded an image to accompany this article that I had photographed myself, but I learnt; big thanks to User:GeneralNotability that it didn’t comply with Wikipedia Commons Derivative works guidelines. As per their suggestion, I made a request to the magazine’s publisher to upload a cover image that I can use. They responded quickly and have done so, and have said that they will email via the OTRS to confirm free usage. I have updated the image.
Please note that, apart from our very recent exchange, I do not have any relationship, paid or otherwise with Out There magazine.
The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 23:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Awards notability
[edit]It was suggested in the AfD discussion for this article that I expand on the awards section to establish notability, the full and lengthy discussion is on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/OutThere_(magazine). The awards are notable on further investigation, but on first glance may not appear so, hence the embellishments in the section. However, I appreciate that it now may lean towards sounding promotional/ad, which is not my intention, but I'm looking for a happy balance. Perhaps Piotrus, or any other more experienced editor could help me out here? Thanks in advance The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 13:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- I think the current section is fine; I don't detect any editorializing. The article would benefit from expansion in other areas (sections), but given the relatively little history of the magazine, it may simply not be possible yet. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Start-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/03 February 2021
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Start-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- Start-Class Tourism articles
- Low-importance Tourism articles
- WikiProject Travel and Tourism articles
- Start-Class magazine articles
- Low-importance magazine articles
- WikiProject Magazines articles