Jump to content

Talk:Park Si-eun (entertainer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 3 June 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 21:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


– As of her debut with STAYC, she uses the mononym Si-eun. Entertainer should be changed to Singer, as she’s now only active as a singer. 2001 should be included to distinguish her from those that share the same name. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 17:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@162 etc.: Oppose per WP:PTOPIC. Those article titles need no birth year as disambiguation. -St3095 (?) 05:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • In support of moving the title to Si-eun (entertainer, born 2001) but not of keeping Park Si-eun. 52-whalien (talk) 04:06, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. It is proposer's responsibility to explain why the subject needs a mononym. Link to some published sources, give us some sort of argument, something. All I see is, "As of her debut with STAYC, she uses the mononym Si-eun." We should give her a new name because she joined a band? The Korean press refers to singers in a certain style, but she hasn't changed her name. She did a drama last year as "Park Si-eun," according to Han Cinema.
I pulled up one of the article's references at random: "하이업엔터 측 "박시은, 당사 소속이지만 전속계약은 NO"(공식입장)" (Hi-Up Entertainment side Park Si-eun belongs to our company, but no exclusive contract" (official position)). That doesn't look like a mononym to me. That the "mononym" version of the name is actually longer than the current full-name version is pretty goofy. 99to99 (talk) 01:22, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.