Talk:Politicization of Middle Eastern food

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Western Asia Unassessed

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics Unassessed

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Culture

@Valereee: Thanks for creating this article. Do we have one on cultural appropriation? Makeandtoss (talk) 18:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cultural appropriation. Valereee (talk) 19:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

move

Supreme Deliciousness, I object to this move. The politicization is happening from more than one side. I don't object to a redirect from the Israeli appropriation title, but that isn't the whole story here, and in light of the entire story it isn't neutral. Please revert and let's discuss, per WP:RM#CM? I don't think there's any chance this would have been expected to be noncontroversial. Valereee (talk) 19:04, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The move was uncontroversial as the "politicization" angle is not supported by RS; the cultural appropriation aspect actually is. Makeandtoss (talk) 19:30, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's controversial and worth discussing if someone objects. Many of the sources discuss the politicization as well as the accusations of appropriation. Valereee (talk) 19:34, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does the scholarship operate at the level of calling these "accusations"? I'm aware of the more honest Israeli chefs, both on the page here, and more generally out there in the world, quite openly admitting the Palestinian origins of much of their most treasured dishes. This has been politicised two-fold: first in the efforts made by the early Israeli state to Hebrewize and de-Arabize its people and culture and exert prejudice towards Arabs (including Arab Jews) and Arabic culture, even while retaining Arabic cultural elements while denying their origins, and in so doing, falsely appropriating it; and secondly, with the rise of reactive politics against cultural appropriation, particularly of indigenous or minority culture, and the taking up of this banner by Palestinian activists. In both instances, however, the epicenter of the topic is very much the cultural appropriation. Isn't the politicisation, per se, more of a meta commentary on the actual topic of appropriation itself? Iskandar323 (talk) 03:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Iskander323, I'm not sure what you're asking when you say Does the scholarship operate at the level of calling these "accusations"?. Are you asking whether anyone is using the word 'accusation', or whether Wikipedia using it is calling it in WikiVoice something that downplays the reality, like when we use 'claim'? I have no attachment to that word, and I have no doubt that much of Israeli cuisine developed directly from adopting/appropriating dishes that had been part of various local cuisines as a way of creating a national cuisine.

I have zero fish to fry, here, other than to present this in a neutral fashion. And I think flat-out titling the article 'Israeli appropriation of' is not neutral. That is what one POV is calling it. Another POV is calling it an 'embrace', for heaven's sake, and that wouldn't be neutral either. Valereee (talk) 14:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was asking if the scholarship uses the terminology of accusations. The framework of appropriation is relevant here because the dishes and foodstuffs that are under discussion are not credited as Arabic cuisine, but relabeled. If one were too compare this to, say, Tex-Mex in the US, I don't think we see the same level of issue taken with acknowledging it as a US version of Mexican food. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you'd see plenty of accusations of appropriation (sometimes literally downright stealing of recipes under false pretenses, or buying them for pennies, which quite likely also happened in the first half of the 20th century in Israel/Palestine, but which in the case of some Mexican/Tex-Mex foods was documented). Valereee (talk) 18:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At a basic level "Middle Eastern" is a bit fast and loose, not least because dishes such as shakshouka are considered distinctively Maghrebi. Iskandar323 (talk) 02:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The topic is entirely about the Israeli appropriation of Arab cuisine. Not "Politicization of Middle Eastern food" --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:36, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the scope is fairly specific here. You could potentially have a parent article on wider Mediterranean bickering over food in former Ottoman sphere countries, including famous tiffs such as that of Algeria-Morocco and Turkey-Greece, but that wouldn't be just Middle Eastern any more. Iskandar323 (talk) 02:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A move is controversial if somebody objects to it. If you want it at Israeli appropriation of Arab cuisine then open a request move for it, but Im moving it back in the meantime. nableezy - 17:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nableezy, thanks. I am not in any way married to 'Policitization of', if that feels NPOV to others. If we can come up with something that feels reasonably neutral to everyone, I'm completely on board. Valereee (talk) 18:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

POV

Not sure if this was the intention or not, but the article seems to take a POV angle. It starts with a section that claims Jews just naturally adopted Arab cuisines, and then followed by a section how this was suddenly "politicized" by the Palestinians. This framing is not supported by RS, which mostly describe it as Israel's appropriation of Arab cuisine. Makeandtoss (talk) 19:32, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely no intention to insert any POV. I wrote this during discussions at Falafel about how much emphasis an article about a food should place on how that food was being used politically. I do not think the sources mostly describe it as Israel's appropriation of Arab cuisine. They talk about a broader topic. Valereee (talk) 19:37, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And it certainly does have a POV now, with that section header change. Valereee (talk) 19:43, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually all the sources are about the Israeli appropriation of Arab cuisine. The title reflects all sources. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:38, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few threads in this topic, so it's good to discuss it, but also wise not to be overly reductive. A lot of Arabic dishes in Israeli cuisine come by way of the Arab Jews that either migrated to Palestine or were already there. Some of these dishes might be generically Arabic, or generically former Ottoman sphere, or more specific to smaller regions or geographies. Hummus, for example, is Levantine. More specific dishes from, for example, Tunisia or Yemen, might be characterised as generally from those countries – and still be identified as such in Israel, as noted on the page – or, in some instances, might be specific to local Arab Jewish communities that emigrated from those countries, such as Tunisian Jews or Yemeni Jews – in such case they might just be termed Jewish/Israeli. There is then the very specific subset of dishes that can be considered to be absorbed from specifically Palestinian cuisine. With all of the above, where there is no acknowledgement of the non-Israeli origins of the dishes, the relationship with the food history is obviously appropriative. This is even true with Arab Jewish dishes from Tunisia and Yemen, because, even though much of these communities may now have been absorbed into Israel, any associated cuisine still has its own unique food history rooted in Arabic/regional culture. Iskandar323 (talk) 02:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli couscous

I haven't checked the source cited for this line, but the relationship between maftoul and Israeli couscous isn't entirely straightforward. Maftoul is a dish made of hand-rolled couscous (also just called maftoul) prepared in a specific Palestinian way. Israeli couscous is also a name both dish and ingredient, but it is an exonym. In Israel it is just called ptitim, and it is a pasta, not couscous at all, which is a misnomer in this instance. Whether or not the preparation of ptitim as a dish then mimicks maftoul (the dish) and becomes appropriative I do not know, but if so, it needs to be clarified that this is the case to avoid the confusion with the actually distinct base ingredients here. Iskandar323 (talk) 02:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 August 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Politicization of Middle Eastern food be renamed and moved to Israeli appropriation of Arab cuisine.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Politicization of Middle Eastern food → Israeli appropriation of Arab cuisine – The entire topic of the article and all the sources are specifically about the Israeli appropriation of Arab cuisine. It is not about the general appropriation or politicization of food about other countries in the Middle East. It is not about Iran appropriating Jordanian food, or Oman appropriating Iraqi food, or Lebanon appropriating Algerian food. This article and its sources are solely and exclusively about the Israeli appropriation of Arab cuisine, so that's what the title should be Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to Israeli appropriation of Arab cuisine per my argument above, entire article and all the sources are about the "Israeli appropriation of Arab cuisine", not a broader "Politicization of Middle Eastern food". --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 20:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support given the plethora of RS discussing the topic in this aspect. Makeandtoss (talk) 09:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, because the suggested usage of 'appropriation' is very contentious and suggests that Wikipedia is taking one side over others, which can lead us into POV territory. I would support changing it to 'Food politics in the Middle East', and ensure that the article includes more viewpoints and debates on other cultures. I am familiar with similar debates over food identities in other areas of the Middle East (though I am still unconvinced that we need this article at all). PeleYoetz (talk) 18:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why wouldn't we need it? Do you think the topic does not meet notability guidelines? ByVarying | talk 23:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly Oppose, The use of the term 'appropriation' implies a clear POV. The lack of examples of Middle Eastern countries other than Israel adopting elements of other cuisines can easily be attributed to the fact that 90% of this article was written by two users, and no clear effort to find other examples has been made. Gaymarsrovers (talk) 22:39, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]