Jump to content

Talk:Poverty in India/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

$0.50 per day for 77% of Indians?

$0.50 per day for 77% of Indians?

"A 2007 report by the state-run National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS) found that 77% of Indians, or 836 million people, lived on less than 20 rupees per day (USD 0.50 nominal, USD 2.0 in PPP), with most working in "informal labour sector with no job or social security, living in abject poverty."[28][29]"

Why is the GDP (nominal) per capita is $941 then or the GDP $2563 in terms of PPP? Do the math, the $0.50 per day for 77% Indians will not make sense based on the $941 per capita and the income distribution gini Index. Other countries with worst income distribution fares better. So Whoever came up with this $0.50 per day..... crap, need to recalculate.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Filcopper (talk • contribs) 01:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

One-third of world's poor in India: Survey

NEW DELHI: India is home to roughly one-third of all poor people in the world. It also has a higher proportion of its population living on less than $2 per day than even sub-Saharan Africa.

That is the sobering news coming out of the World Bank's latest estimates on global poverty. The fine print of the estimates also shows that the rate of decline of poverty in India was faster between 1981 and 1990 than between 1990 and 2005. This is likely to give fresh ammunition to those who maintain that economic reforms, which started in 1991, have failed to reduce poverty at a faster rate.

India, according to the new estimates, had 456 million people or about 42% of the population living below the new international poverty line of $1.25 per day. The number of Indian poor also constitute 33% of the global poor, which is pegged at 1.4 billion people.

India also had 828 million people, or 75.6% of the population living below $2 a day. Sub-Saharan Africa, considered the world's poorest region, is better — it has 72.2% of its population (551m) people below the $2 a day level.

The estimates are based on recently recalculated purchasing power parity (PPP) exchange rates, which makes comparisons across countries possible. The dollar exchange rates being referred to here, therefore, are not the ones used in normal exchange rates.

While the full report has not yet been released, a briefing note sent by the Bank had some of the data and showed that the poverty rate — those below $1.25 per day — for India had come down from 59.8% in 1981 to 51.3% by 1990 or 8.5 percentage points over nine years. Between 1990 and 2005, it declined to 41.6%, a drop of 9.7 percentage points over 15 years, clearly a much slower rate of decline.

An FAQ on the new estimates, also provided by the Bank, however states, "India has maintained even progress against poverty since the 1980s, with the poverty rate declining at a little under one percentage point per year." vkvora2001 (talk) 02:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

The writer of above peragraph, Mr. Vora is blocked in Hindi Wikipedia with is all internet lines. English wikipedian is also requested to warn him for such activities in english wikipedia. He is totally mad old man.--Voravora (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with the UN calculation of poverty in India. I stand with the Government of India's calculation that Poverty is about 28% in India. Believe me, in small villages and towns in Indian government rations offer food for families at less than Rs. 10/month. Vegetables and meats are available at very subsidized rates in villages, farms, and small towns which make up more than 88% of India. Monthly rent for houses cost less than Rs. 25 which comes to less than Rs. 40/month worth of expenditure. Many construction workers earn about Rs. 300/month and are given allowances to buy basic necessities at subsidized rates across towns, villages and some cities like Chennai, Mumbai and Bangalore. So, please do not try to tarnish the image of India on the global stage by talking about erroneous calculations about poverty, illiteracy, and malnutrition. Thanks for your time. Svr014 (talk) 20:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

World Bank paints a bleak picture of India - Tuesday , May 12, 2009

Can someone please add information from this news item from World bank: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/world-bank-paints-a-bleak-picture-of-india/458110/ I am not good with adding references. Thanks --ReluctantPhilosopher (talk) 23:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

India is one of the fastest growing economies in Asia and has far less poverty...

India is a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), United Nations organization (all branches but the UN Security Council), G8+5 (Industrialized Countries and Leading Emerging Economies), and G-20 (Major Economies). India is Asia's third (3rd) Largest Economy, and World's fourth (4th) Largest Economy when measured in terms of GDP (PPP)(Source: The CIA World Factbook). Every year more than three million Indians graduate from Colleges and Universities across India which is considered strongest among emerging economies (Source: The Times of India). Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) augmented by about 78% between 1991 and 2001 (Source: The Indian Express).

I disagree with the UN calculation of poverty in India. I stand with the Government of India's calculation that Poverty is about 28% in India. Believe me, in small villages and towns in Indian government rations offer food for families at less than Rs. 10/month. Vegetables and meats are available at very subsidized rates in villages, farms, and small towns who make up more than 88% of India. Monthly rent for houses cost less than Rs. 25 which comes to less than Rs. 40/month worth of expenditure. Many construction workers earn about Rs. 300/month and are given allowances to buy basic necessities at subsidized rates across towns, villages and some cities like Chennai, Mumbai and Bangalore. So, please do not try to tarnish the image of India on the global stage by talking about erroneous calculations about poverty, illiteracy, and malnutrition from any non-credible sources. Thanks for your time. Svr014 (talk) 20:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

As a lady said, "I am too short for my weight", so are your figures, Rs. 300 a month, and rents of Rs. 40/ a month, the figures are right, only if the year is 1980. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 18:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Lack of consistency and reliability in estimating poverty in India

I am listing two studies/publication on poverty in India

  • A study was done by the McKinsey Global Institute. This study found 54% of the people living in India were living on a household income of less than 90,000 rupees a year. That means about a dollar per person per day.
  • National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector (NCEUS) published a report in 2007. This report state, 77% of Indians (that means 836 million people), lived on less than 20 rupees per day (USD 0.50 nominal, USD 2.0 in PPP). Most of them have no job or social security. They live in abject poverty.[1][2]

One of the problems with estimating poverty in India is a lack of consistent and reliable numbers. McKinsey study quoted above (46% at $1 a day or above for a household size of 5) is off by a factor compared to 77% under $0.5 a day by NCEUS. To add insult to injury here are some industry numbers that do not fit well with 77% under $0.5 a day.

  • The number of cell phones in India was 250 Million India to oust US in number of cell phone users in Jan 2008; about 400 million in mid 2009 and slated to easily cross 500 Million Cellphones in India in 2010 with a current growth rate of over 10 million new cell phones a month. A growth that is clearly not abating. At $20-$200 per cell phone and $0.02-$0.04 a minute rate, it is a luxury that folks earning $1 a day cannot afford after paying for food, housing, clothes.
  • 2001 numbers for basic amenities from census bureau India Census Bureau Household Amenities for percentage household reach were Bi-cycles (45%); TV (31%); radio (33%) do not fit well with 77% under $0.5 a day. All these numbers tally well with industry news. Do note this is 2001 census, about 7 years before 77% under $.5 a day was computed. These are amenities households at $1 a day per person cannot afford let alone those with $0.5 a day per person. The country has grown between 7%-9% a year; i.e. almost GDP almost doubled in these 7 years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amolkekre (talk • contribs) 18:26, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Study results do differ depending upon the year they were conducted, how they define poverty, and their methodology. Our job on wikipedia is not to correct or analyze these results, but to report them accurately. Therefeore I have reverted your recent edit to the article, which fell afoul of wikipedia policy of no original research. Of course if you know of some published critiques of the NCEUS or McKinsey Global Institute study, we can add that to the article. Abecedare (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

clear racism in the page

apparently only experienced users can edit pages, this page on poverty in India calls "east indians" filthy and what not —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.53.200 (talk) 05:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC) % below poverty line: 25% (2007 est.) Source: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html


India not doing enough

The report criticises economically liberal India where, it says, 30 million people have been added to the ranks of the hungry since the mid-1990s and 46% of children are underweight. [1]93.139.71.161 (talk) 09:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Toilet stuff

I just removed one sourced statement about people defecating in the open along with some random commentary from the lead. I have no problem if something sensibly worded goes in the article, but this content is undue in the lead, and definitely the commentary is not appropriate. -SpacemanSpiff 06:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


UN Human Development Index Statistic

Why is the following removed agaain and again, although it is a sourced fact from a very notable authority, with an important comparison to a neighbouring and similar country?

"According to the UN Development Programme, Human Development Index (HDI), 75.6% of India's population lives under $2 a day, some 41.6% live under $1 a day compared to 22.6% in Pakistan. REF: http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/indicators/102.html " —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.229.241.178 (talk) 04:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, you are the only one who seems obsessed with including this statistic. As administrator Abecedare noted, the statistics you cited are "redundant" and the comparison between India and Pakistan is "undue". He also noted that the article already cited the "two most relevant sources for poverty statistics." Can you tell me why the poverty rate in India has anything to do with the poverty rate in Pakistan? On a side note, I'm kind of curious why you made these edits. Vedant (talk) 16:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Edit request from Daniash007, 15 June 2010

{{editsemiprotected}} Please do not Singleout Bihar in the JPEG image you have uploaded. This is totally demoralising as Bihar is now the second most economic growth state in Nation. Please refer to the image as a poor village in India rather than Bihar. Let the good work be continuing in India. Daniash007 (talk) 18:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Partly done: Removed "poorest state" comment as it gives undue weight to a possibly untrue fact. SpigotMap 18:34, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Title of the article

I dispute the title of the article. It should be "Poverty in North India" rather than downgrading the entire nation especailly much prosperous South which has nothing to do with poverty. To support my debate, i would like to refer the recent study conducted by the Oxford University which says the poverty prevails in 8 north indian states. Please see below:

A study by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative using a Multi-dimensional Poverty Index (MPI) found that there were 421 million poor living under the MPI in Bihar, Chattisgarh, Jharkand, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. This number is higher than the 410 million poor living in the 26 poorest African nations.[3]

Are you claiming that there is no poverty in South India ? Vinay84 (talk) 10:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Improve this article

I am sure we can do much more to improve this important article than to debate upon whether a particular photo should appear here or not. Who cares if a beggar's photo is put up here? Presently, the article is a mess! It resembles a plagiarized thesis of some Indian university, where sense, readability and continuity are thrown out of the window. I tried to bring some clarity into one section on "estimates of poverty in India" - removed duplicate statements and provided some sort of continuity. I hope others will do the same to the remaining part of the article. (Saildew (talk) 19:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC))

Needed more statistics and definitions

This article need to elaborate on how poverty is defined and measured in India . For example there can be a sub-section on the various definitions mentioned in the article. Also, it needs tables of poverty by demographics ; urban-poor, by religion etc. I believe census collects this data. Vinay84 (talk) 10:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Original research

The sub-heading "Rich Indians are not generous" is inappropriate and misleading. First of all, I highly doubt the veracity of any statistics that tries to measure just how much wealthy Indians are donating (or not). Secondly, even if good statistics were available, it is quite a bit of jump (downright ignorant, in my opinion) to claim that it is due to lack of generosity. --Blacksun (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Outdated citations

We are in 2011. Citations from 2005, especially in the heading, should be updated. --Blacksun (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Why would someone want to remove a valid statement?

Well, someone without a username thinks its a great move to remove the statement I had inserted which said that there IS a confusion in India regarding the correct estimate of poverty. That statement is VERY important because unless we know how many are poor in India, how can we even have a debate on what causes poverty, its impact, etc. Every discussion would be futile if the estimation of poverty varies from 27% to 80%.

This very article had stated (before my edit) that the Planning Commission of India has accepted 27.5% as the poverty percentage before protests made them take a U turn and accept the Tendulkar Committee report of 37%. That 10% is a huge difference!

See this earlier version:

According to the criterion used by the Planning Commission of India, 27.5% of the population was living below the poverty line in 2004–2005, down from 51.3% in 1977–1978, and 36% in 1993-1994.

And I wonder why this important information (change that I made to the above sentence) has been removed:

Earlier, the Planning Commission had said that 27.5% of the population was living below the poverty line in 2004–2005, down from 51.3% in 1977–1978 and 36% in 1993–1994[5] based on the 61st round of the National Sample Survey (NSS), and the criterion used was monthly per capita consumption expenditure below 356.35 for rural areas and 538.60 for urban areas.

I hope people will be more civic enough to discuss issues before making fanciful changes. Now, I don't want to revert the edits that have been made as it would only lead to a foolish, unwanted exercise. (Saildew (talk) 18:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC))

Communal Award

But for Bania Gandhi, implementation of Communal Award instead of Reservation in India would have alleviated poverty among Dalits. --4thaugust1932 (talk) 07:13, 6 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4thaugust1932 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Causes of poverty in India

I think that one of the major original reasons of the poverty crisis was the steady destruction of India's industries by British imperialism. Jawaharlal Nehru, in his 'The Discovery of India' describes in great detail how India was transformed into a market colony to fuel Britain's industrial revolution. India's traditional ethnic industries were destroyed, new landed classes arose and sanctions and duties were imposed to curb Indian industry. Initially every effort was made to keep the masses ignorant and backward by withholding scientific and technological advances in India. I do think this is an important background the article should provide under the section of 'Causes'. Zafar142003 (talk) 04:06, 21 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zafar142003 (talk • contribs) 04:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Bodhgaya image et al

Wikipedia is an certain nations website. Most articles are written to spite India. Most of what is written here and what has been written since Vasco da gama set his accursed foot on Indian soil is to spite India, Indian religions and Indian traditions. Which is why we have Slumdog Millionaire winning Oscars, and Lagan loosing. The world of a certain complexion wishes India to lose even in a fantasy. There is no denying that India is wretched grim poverty, the person in the photograph is using his disabled anatomy to earn money just as it is common in rich, certain complexion countries for persons of a certain gender, to enhance certain aspects of their anatomy to earn money. I vote for as many photos of filth and despair. Wake up Indian friends, an average US citizen eats 270 pounds of meat[4] in a year. And there are the cars that they drive, the lawns that they water, the pets that they feed, the suburban sprawl they live in. That is why other nations are poor. The rich certain complexion world, and the rich of the poor black world have cornered resources to leave the rest hungry, homeless and without health, education, freedom and honour. And then they send there their aid and missionaries to save our souls.


Aside from the fact that this is a page to discuss the article, not your personal feelings... you can just go ahead and say "evil white people" instead of "the world of a certain complexion". Everybody knows that's what you really mean, so it is unclear as to why you think you need to be clever about it... or why you aren't ranting in a blog instead of here. 192.54.250.11 (talk) 17:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Discussion about the Official Measure of Poverty is missing (45 cents per day (rural) & 50 cents per day (urban))

"The Indian government sets its official poverty line at 816 rupees per person per month in rural areas and 1,000 rupees per person per month for city dwellers. That works out to about 40 cents a day in the countryside and 50 cents a day in the city." - According to the official measure only 22% are living below poverty comparable to that of Western Countries which is about 10-15%, according to their own poverty lines. This measure has been severely criticized by many.[2].

Many paragraphs in the "Poverty estimates" section can be included in a History section. Measures of Poverty (In India) section should be created to include the above and other measures. "Impact of poverty" needs to be expanded as well.

As this is a large article I don't want simply modify existing sections. I am also aware that this is a sensitive issue for many Indian editors. --Natkeeran (talk) 22:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Consensus

I think we have achieved as much consensus as we are going to achieve. User:Otolemur crassicaudatus has agreed that having a beggar image is not right. I do not know what his reasoning behind keeping it is now, since it tends to change as time goes by.

"I agree that the other articles on poverty has no beggar image, it is not right, and I also agree that all articles should be uniform" [3]

User:Adam.J.W.C. doesnt seem like he's ever going to yield. Since he always tends to wait for the discussion to be over and then just inserts the image again. As he has done here], here

"If he photo is removed, just weight a month or so then re insert it, if it is removed again then do one revert per day after that, I don't think you would be breaking any law by doing so. I could step in as well" [4]

There are somethings about which not everyone will agree. I think we have enough people agreeing that the image should be removed as it is not an appropriate portrayal of poverty in india and an exploitation of one's "poverty and disability by exaggerating his helplessness at the time of begging"

Slumdog Millionaire

There is no relevance to having a link to the movie Slumdog Millionaire in this page. The movie was a work of fiction while this page is meant to portray facts. The other poverty pages have no links to fictitious works meant for profiteering. It is akin to having a link to Inglorious Basterds in the Liberation of Paris page or Avatar in the forced migration/refugee.This movie has shown only about the poverty in Mumbai which is place of cellebraties . Here people can earn thier livelyhood easily but in other parts of India or in Maharashtra people are living a harsh life : no water,electricity,medical facilities,education........etc I think that government should take some charge about those people they are helpless. They even can't express their feelings to the govenment cause they are illitrate and they are more supressed . All the educated people wont move on that place because they think that this place is useless and find there jobs on a big citties like Delhi,Mumbai...........

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here, here, here, here, here, and elsewhere. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 20:53, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Blogs and speculation

Cgdev.org a blog was used to completely white wash valid data published by repituble sources such as UN and the World Bank the blog is assuming certain changes which have not been implemented nor verified and I have removed them plenty of valid sources have been given but they were pushed down to the bottom of the article to accomidate this bogus blog. GaryKhanna (talk) 12:24, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Furthermore the initial addition of the blog was by a sock. GaryKhanna (talk) 12:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Issues with July 7 2014 version of this article

1.Instances of WP:SYNTHESIS and WP:OR. The lead, for example, is a synthesis because neither source [3] nor [1] and [2] make this claim, or link it to poverty and its reduction.

Quote: "World's two biggest Social Programs (...) and[1] and (...)[2] due to which per capita income has increased at an annual average of nearly 20 per cent during the last decade.[3]

2. Instances of WP:POV. For example, one set of poverty estimates are highlighted as if scholars widely agree on these numbers. They don't. There are several schools, each with different methodology and estimates of poverty in India. For neutral point of view, the article must not take sides, but should explain the major sides, fairly and without bias. The article should cover absolute poverty and relative poverty in India.

3. Instances of WP:SOAPBOX and WP:COATRACK. For examples, see abuse and causes sub-section. While opinions of activists, current affairs, news articles and politics may look interesting, these quickly become obsolete to a serious topic like poverty. A crime against a few people may belong in wiki news, but an encyclopedic article is not the place for crime news and alleged link to poverty. There are 1000s of secondary sources such as peer reviewed journal articles, books and reviews on poverty in India, and a better article would rely on these, not each new round of sensational opinion.

AmyNorth (talk) 15:43, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Historical data

Why have the historical statistics been removed? Data on the reduction on poverty rates is both inspiring (change is possible), and also allows projection into possible future rates.

At the moment it seems that pointing out that poverty in India is quantitatively reducing, is somehow inconvenient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.127.214.239 (talk) 04:47, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

China and international poverty threshold table

This keeps repeating, and only for China for some reason. Last: here. The table is a historical comparison of national poverty lines from reliable sources, and is a part of the history section. If you wish to change it, please explain. JenniferPelaez (talk) 02:48, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Untitled

Image depicting unsanitary conditions in India

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sshah11 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Poverty in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:50, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Poverty in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Poverty in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Poverty in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Article evaluation feedback

After reading this article, I think the structure of this article is complete, and there are enough arguments to support the theme of this article. He introduced me to poverty in India for decades, and gave me the poverty areas that have decreased over time. I really like the way of using the table, it makes it easier for me to see the difference in data comparison.Jiazhen Lu (talk) 01:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Shall I add this 2020 study?

Specifically this data point on a 2020 World Economic Forum report on the status of Poverty in India? "Some 220 million Indians sustained on an expenditure level of less than Rs 32 / day — the poverty line for rural India — going by the last headcount of the poor in India in 2013." NishantXavier (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/economy/how-india-remains-poor-it-will-take-7-generations-for-india-s-poor-to-reach-mean-income--68898

Economic impact of British imperialism

@Fowler&fowler May I ask for your investigation into the edit Special:Diff/1040376238 which replaced "Mughal India" to "India"? Thanks! — DaxServer (talk to me) 09:29, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mzk224.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nanhezhu. Peer reviewers: Brynneparkman, Kalewis6.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Page needs to be updated with new paper from IMF on extreme poverty

Extreme poverty in 2019 and 2020 was less than 1%. 42.109.144.71 (talk) 12:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

  1. ^ Nearly 80 pct of India lives on half dollar a day, Reuters, August 10 2007. Accessed: August 15, 2007
  2. ^ "Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihoods in the Unorganised Sector" [5] ], National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganised Sector, Government of India, August, 2007. Accessed: August 25, 2007.
  3. ^ "8 Indian states have more poor than 26 poorest African nations". Times of India. July 12, 2010.
  4. ^ http://linhla.com/_LETSACTNOW%20-%20FTP/_foodforall/foodforall.html
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Poverty_in_India/Archive_3&oldid=1214174752"