This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
I have done a fair bit of work to try to find citations for this academic. I still can't see that he is more than borderline notable. I think it would be hard at this stage to contest a move to delete the article. Nonetheless I will wait and watch for a while before coming to a conclusion. If the citations I cannot find but have requested are forthcoming they will; tip the balance in its favour in my mind. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While it may be no particular demerit, the article is heavily biased towards broken hearts. The subject;s other academic record seems either not to be particularly notable or is neglected in the article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
