Talk:Red Hill, Australian Capital Territory

Australia: Places / Canberra Low‑importance

	Australia portal Red Hill, Australian Capital Territory is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Fork Article?[edit]

I feel this article would benifit from splitting Red Hill (the hill) from the suburb article. Photos of rocks located on the hill is way too much detail in an article nominally about a suburb. --Martyman-(talk) 05:32, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Currently the article to my mind is both about the suburb and the hill/ridge as per the introductory paragraph which mentions both. The article is not yet of excessive length. It is still very much in development and certainly needs improvement. As it improves I hope the balance will also improve and it will become more coherent. This is not to say that a fork is not possible, it is just that I cannot see the necessity at present.--A Y Arktos 10:07, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Suburb directions in infobox[edit]

I have noticed that some suburbs in Canberra, eg. Red Hill seem to have problems with east and west mixed up in suburb boxes. Is there some historical reason for this? I will do some fixing up now. Feel free to disagree and make changes. RobBrisbane 09:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There used to be a a Canberra box, which had everthing in the right place, but it was converted to an Australian wide box, - many errors crept in at that point. GB 21:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Height[edit]

Davidson trig 749m [1] --RobBrisbane 08:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Red Hill, Australian Capital Territory/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I've rated this B because it covers most of the things it should cover, but it needs a lot of work on its organisation and expression to make it a coherent article.--Grahamec 05:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 05:55, 24 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 04:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Boxford destroyed[edit]

The garden at Boxford was destroyed some time after its sale in 2006 https://www.allhomes.com.au/21-scarborough-street-red-hill-act-2603 despite its heritage listing. At present I am yet to find an online citation for the destruction although the allhomes site makes it clear :( --Matilda ^talk 23:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]