Talk:Rise Against discography
 | Rise Against discography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Rise Against discography received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
| This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Anti-Flag split release date?[edit]
Anyone know anything about this release? Various webstores claim to have released it on varying dates in February, and I guess it was also given out for free at several concerts from both Rise Against and Anti-Flag in February and March. The record itself says 2008, but I suppose it's possible that it was only pressed in 2008 and not released until 2009. Fezmar9 (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Savior[edit]
Please stop adding this song as a single, there has been no official confirmation from the band, their management, or their record label. Thanks. Alex (talk) 18:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- It charted, so can it be added atleast to a non-single chartings section? icelandic hurricane #12(talk) 19:52, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
the song charted, so it's automatically the third single.67.191.60.174 (talk) 14:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. A tune from an album can do well enough to chart through digital downloads, even though it's not been released as a single. For example, a band release an album with songs A,B,C,D and E. A and B are also released as singles. Song C is popular, and achieves enough downloads to chart.
- Either way, "discuss" means "discuss", not "announce your disagreement and then revert".
- Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 14:40, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- yes i agree that it isn't "automatically the third single". i can name many occasions when that wasn't the case. but what of my idea? lots of discographys have a separate table for non-single songs that charted. icelandic hurricane #12(talk) 22:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- It is true that some songs can chart based entirely on sales, but that only applies to the Billboard Hot 100. The Mainstream and Modern Rock charts are only based on radio play. It seems silly to me to post a separate chart for charting songs not classified as singles as seen on Linkin Park discography. A chart already exists, why not just add "Savior," and if need be, add a comment that it is not an official single? Fezmar9 (talk) 23:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Works for me ;-) (I'd be happiest with a note mentioning that it wasn't released as a single, because I think that's a notable fact). TFOWRThis flag once was red 23:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- It is true that some songs can chart based entirely on sales, but that only applies to the Billboard Hot 100. The Mainstream and Modern Rock charts are only based on radio play. It seems silly to me to post a separate chart for charting songs not classified as singles as seen on Linkin Park discography. A chart already exists, why not just add "Savior," and if need be, add a comment that it is not an official single? Fezmar9 (talk) 23:31, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- yes i agree that it isn't "automatically the third single". i can name many occasions when that wasn't the case. but what of my idea? lots of discographys have a separate table for non-single songs that charted. icelandic hurricane #12(talk) 22:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Savior is official third single.......[edit]
Savior is third single as of now. Cause billboard.com adding the song on Rise Against single chart history. Thanks. Nicholasmajestic (User talk:Nicholasmajestic) 11:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rise Against discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6gbBoGjsy?url=http://www.kerrang.com/24423/ultimate-rise-against-videography-by-tim-mcilrath/ to http://www.kerrang.com/24423/ultimate-rise-against-videography-by-tim-mcilrath/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
BVMI certifications[edit]
With all due respect, I added BVMI certifications on the Rise Against singles discography because it’s both truth and facts based on the BVMI certification database and yes, I did research and made useful edits. I double checked everything and there’s no reason for you to delete them from their singles discography. Here’s the link as proof: https://www.musikindustrie.de/wie-musik-zur-karriere-werden-kann/markt-bestseller/gold-/platin-und-diamond-auszeichnung/datenbank/?action=suche&strTitel=&strInterpret=Rise+Against&strTtArt=alle&strAwards=checked Thank you. FireDragonValo (talk) 19:13, 12 December 2023 (UTC)