Talk:Robert Lewandowski/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Youth career issues

Delta Warszawa

Robert Lewandowski played for Delta Warszawa as an older junior in junior's league (liga żaków) - Delta Warszawa Archive (season 2005-06). Please do not add it to senior career statistics or clubs as he did not have a professional contract with this club!

Legia II Warszawa

Again, a junior team, as he did not have a professional contract with Legia Warszawa. It is a youth academy that currently plays in Młoda Ekstraklasa (Youth Ekstraklasa) - Current table and info. It is known by the name Young Legia also.

To sum up

Professional statistics should not list youth teams. Apart from that there are no objective sources. The one added had only number of goals scored, probably not even accurate.

Answer to this wise guy above

You're wrong. He played in senior Delta Warszawa team in Polish "IV liga" currently known as Polish Third Division "III liga" in season:"2004/2005". Information about transfer to Delta senior team:[1]. Goals in Delta senior team in "IV liga" season 2004/2005:[2].

And Legia II Warszawa is not youth team. It was reserve team. Legia reserve team was disbaned in 2007. In 2005/2006 season this team played in Polish "III liga" currently known as Polish Second Division "II liga". Lewandowski scored 2 goals in this season for Legia II Warszawa.[3].

So wise guy Kismeth (talk) aka IP 78.26.191.197 (talk) stop acting like a fool and stop revert my edits because they are good.--Kostas66 (talk) 04:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

als je met hem speelt op fm 09 weet je zekker dat je minimaal 10 doelpunten per seisoen hebt —Preceding unsigned comment added by Panter5000 (talk • contribs) 08:18, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Should be mentioned...

...in Sport in Poland article in Famous Polish athletes section... 90.156.41.111 (talk) 17:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


I believe there is something wrong with his main picture... dashydash — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.8.6.190 (talk) 23:38, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 April 2014

"Varsovia Warsaw" is a tautology. Should be just "Varsovia" 109.232.26.197 (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Done Seems benign enough. —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

BLP

The stuff about the student and the "finger" is just inane gossip and not particularly relevant to the article. Per WP:BLP, specifically Wikipedia:BLPGOSSIP: Avoid repeating gossip. Ask yourself whether the source is reliable; whether the material is being presented as true; and whether, even if true, it is relevant to a disinterested article about the subject. Note that this applies even if the material is true.

Hence, removing, once again per WP:BLP. The onus is on those who wish to keep the material to demonstrate that it is somehow vital to the article.Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Not all negative news is gossip. Gossip doesn't make the news, multiple times. The onus is on you to prove the reliably source material is actually gossip. the idea of the sections is to avoid tabloids and rumour sites from adding unsubstantiated material into articles that might damage the reputation of the subject. That is not happening here.
It's no different than the discussion about prostitute scandals that have plagued several players. Gossip? No just negative publicity. Prove it meets the criteria of gossip with two sources to back the discussion and you might have a case. Without proof, you're just edit warring. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Not all negative news is gossip, but gossip is gossip and this is gossip. And actually WP:BLP means that YOU need to show that it is vitally important for this trivial crap to be in the article. Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
No. Gossip is that which does not have RSes to support it and actually BLP means that you have to prove that the sources are not reliable. It's vitally important that you understand the difference between RSes and gossip sites. If you don't like my interpretation and that of the other editor involved, you are free to take it up at WP:BLPN or WP:RSN but don't revert here until you get another editor on your side. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:22, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
No, that is completely incorrect. Please read WP:BLPGOSSIP again. Or for that matter please read my comment above, where I've helpfully bolded the part which says "even if true". Reliability and "gossip" are two different things. Something can be non-gossip and reliably sourced, or non-gossip and not reliably sourced. It can be gossip and reliably sourced, or gossip and not reliably sourced. For it to be included in a BLP it needs to be BOTH not gossip and reliably sourced.
Look. The story is that some guy showed Lewandowski a finger, there were some charges filed, then they were dropped and the finger-shower apologized. If this concerned a non-public figure would this be in any way notable? No. Hence it's gossip. Is this occurrence relevant to the reason why Lewandowski is a public figure or did it have an impact on his professional career? No. Hence it's gossip. Does the inclusion of this tidbit of information add anything of encyclopedic value to the article or benefit the reader? No. Hence it's gossip.
You also appear to be confused about where the burden of proof lies and the fact that BLP trumps both 3RR and consensus. Finally, it's extremely hypocritical for you to post warning templates about edit-warring on my talk page when you are engaging in edit warring yourself.Volunteer Marek (talk) 03:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Volunteer Marek, there are clear facts here. What we know is that a 17-year-old student filed a complaint with police against Robert Lewandowski. This is a fact that is supported by a reference. We also know the charge was dropped. This fact is supported by a reference. This is not a one–sided statement as Lewandowski denied the incident. Another fact supported by a reference. You stated that it specifically violates Wikipedia:BLPGOSSIP. Wikipedia:BLPGOSSIP "ask yourself whether the source is reliable." If this newspaper isn't a reliable reference, then I would have to doubt every single reference on Wikipedia. The student actually says he used his middle finger in the reference. So, it's not an allegation. I removed the word "allegedly." So, the 17–year–old using his middle finger is another fact.

I'm not sure if you know the background of Robert Lewandowski back in January. On 3 January 2014, Robert Lewandowski signed a pre–contract with Bayern. Borussia Dortmund, Lewandowski's current team, lost Mario Götze, another Dortmund star to Bayern the previous summer. Dortmund supporters would have been angry to say the least to lose another star player to a direct rival. So, this 17–year–old student, who admittedly was angered by Lewendowski's future departure to Bayern, which is another fact supported by the reference, used his middle finger and decided to file a complaint with police. So, I would definitely say this is worthy to put into the article if you take a look at the whole picture and I would also say that this is not gossip with references to back it up. Kingjeff (talk) 05:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh come on. You're speculating on the student's motives, you're speculating on the impact it might have had, you're speculating on the the whole situation. That's more or less the definition of gossip. And like I mentioned above, and am now forced to repeat for the third time, reliability is not enough. The policy says "even if true".Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:17, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

In the reference, the student was quoted "When I saw who is to come, I showed him the finger out of frustration over his departure to Bayern. I know that was not right." Kingjeff (talk) 05:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

So? What's your point? How does this indicate that this is anything but trivial inane info which has no place in a BLP? Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

The point I was making above is that there is nothing trivial about it. If anything, there isn't enough content on the topic. Kingjeff (talk) 05:31, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Well... in that case the best I can answer to that is that you failed to make your point and if anything provided support for the opposite. Again, why is this important? If it happened to a regular person would it be notable? Did it affect his career? Were there any repercussions? Was it a major scandal? Is it vital to understanding the topic at hand? No, no, no, no, and no.Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Is this still going on? Marek, you're wrong and that's all there is to it. If you think you're right take it to a larger audience as I suggested above: either WP:BLPN or WP:RSN. You have no leg to stand on and your bully tactics don't work with two experienced editors. I've had the experience of dealing with you before and it was a similar song-and-dance. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:11, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
One more time - and this is the fourth time I have to repeat myself - this isn't about reliability of sources, it's about whether or not the information is sufficiently important for a WP:BLP. So far you have not even began to address that issue. And speaking of "bully tactics" - that's when you leave "scary" templates on experienced editors pages in order to intimidate them. Which is I believe your MO, not mine.Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Welp, here we go [4].Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:46, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Trivia, and entirely inappropriate in a biography. AndyTheGrump (talk) 08:05, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Utterly trivial and I simply fail to see how such a minor incident of no consequence belongs in a biography. I agree with Volunteer Marek and AndyTheGrump. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 16:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Cullen328, please explain how this is trivial and a minor incident. Kingjeff (talk) 22:01, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
First, again, it's actually up to you (or Walter) to explain how it is NOT a trivial and minor incident, this being a BLP issue. Second, I've already explained several times why it's trivial and minor. It didn't impact his career. Charges were dropped. If he wasn't a celebrity nobody would've noticed. Basically nothing happened. It's irrelevant to why he's notable. It's irrelevant to this article. The only justification provided above for its inclusion is based on speculation about what "might have" happened if things had been different. In other words, gossip and trivia, pure and simple.Volunteer Marek (talk) 22:24, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I have "explain how it is NOT a trivial and minor incident." I have explained that everything is factually correct. According to your logic, this article shouldn't even exist. Kingjeff (talk) 22:43, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I too have explained how it is not trivial nor minor. Please support your claim. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:46, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
No. All that either one of you have done is to repeat that the source is reliable - which isn't the issue, as explained, what, five times already? - and claimed without support that it's not gossip and trivia. Even though it very clearly is. As other users have noticed.
And don't try to invent "my logic" to set up some strawman. If you can't see the difference between the Rob Ford scandal and some minor crap incident like the one we're discussing here then your BLP gauge is definitely off and you need to step back.Volunteer Marek (talk) 22:50, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Our BLP policy states "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives; the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment. This policy applies to any living person mentioned in a BLP". This is an incident involving a 17 year old giving a professional athlete "the finger". No one was convicted or went to jail, and it is of no ongoing biographical significance whatsoever. It is the very essence of a triviality that doesn't belong in a BLP. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I agree. This material doesn't belong in a BLP. Capitalismojo (talk) 22:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Marek, I have given more than quotes the article. I gave you the background of the situation. You accused me "speculating." At that point, I proved your claim to be wrong with a quote from the reference. Cullen, please explain how this is a tabloid–type of comment. Kingjeff (talk) 23:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I think it's ridiculous this was ever included. What effect has there been on Lewandowski's career? None as far as I can tell. WP:NOTNEWS. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 23:17, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
An angry17 year old kid gave an athlete the finger. Charges were dropped. It is the very essence of tabloid type content. It of no consequence to the athlete's career and unworthy of inclusion. We need to use editorial judgment, and disinterested editors can see how trivial.this is. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Really? I call those facts. Cullen328 and Jmorrison230582, as I have mentioned above, this isn't some random event. Kingjeff (talk) 23:30, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

No one here is saying this incident didn't happen. The consensus here, and at the BLPN is that it isn't worthy of being included in this article. Capitalismojo (talk) 23:32, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Consensus hasn't been reached. Other editors have only been informed today about the discussion. Legitimate consensus can't be reached unless you give enough time for other editors to be informed of the discussion. Kingjeff (talk) 23:38, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Ok, but then since this is a BLP issue "no consensus" becomes "don't include". Volunteer Marek (talk) 23:42, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
BLP policy can't be overturned by local consensus anyway. AndyTheGrump (talk) 23:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
The emerging consensus is clearly to keep this out of the article. Nowhere in our policies and guidelines will you find something like "anything factual belongs in Wikipedia". We use editorial judgment here, informed in this case by WP:BLP. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:49, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
I'm aware of that. But it's not minor, trivial, or gossip like it's being made out to be. It has been explained to you. This isn't a discussion of overturning BLP policy. This is a discussion on if it meets the requirements of BLP policy. Kingjeff (talk) 23:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
I can see no 'explanation' - just repetitive assertions that it isn't trivia because you say so. Where is the long-term coverage of this 'event'? Where are the sources that suggest that this event is going to affect Lewandowski's career? Where is the evidence that anyone cares about it? AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Neither you nor Walter have even tried to explain why this will be seen as an important incident in Lewandowski's life or career in 5, 10 or 20 years. Or even now, in May, 2014. Please feel free to do your best to make a convincing case, which so far, you haven't done. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:07, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

There is a convincing explaination. If you follow what I have wrote since the beginning of the discussion, then you'll find the explaination. Volunteer Marek tried to pass it off as speculation which I disproved quickly. Kingjeff (talk) 00:12, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
So no evidence? Just as I thought. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:19, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
As I said, the evidence is above in the discussion. Kingjeff (talk) 00:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
I asked for evidence of long-term coverage. You have provided none. I asked for sources suggesting that this is going to affect Lewandowski's career. You have provided none. Without such evidence, this event doesn't belong in the article, per WP:BLP policy. That is all that needs to be said. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:28, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: www.insideworldsoccer.com/2013/06/robert-lewandowski-leaving-dortmund-next-season.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 17:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

The phrase that is currently there reads "with Lewandowski himself confirming his desire to leave amid strong interest from Bundesliga rivals Bayern Munich" and the lede text reads "Robert Lewandowski has confirmed his desire to leave Borussia Dortmund this summer amid strong interest from Bayern Munich." Thanks for the notice, but it's important to know what the copyright issue actually is. 19:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Is Vatican visit notable

"Man meets paedophile-abler" is not a notable event in any way, shape or form, and lying about this section existing undermines anything else you say about the matter from here on in. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Just a reminder - WP:BLP policy applies on talk pages too. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
The catholic church has enabled child abuse, this is not a violation of any BLP. Calm it. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 20:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
As above - exaggerated name-calling can ruin the point you are trying to make. No matter what you think of the Vatican, Mr Lewandowski is a Catholic and sees Pope Francis as his authority in life. '''tAD''' (talk) 19:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
So, as Lewandowski sees a pope as his authority, and them meeting is therefore notable, should we then have Lewandowski's first meetings with Klopp and Guardiola too? Absolute nonsense. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 20:32, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
If you have reliable articles on it, go ahead '''tAD''' (talk) 21:06, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
It's not about having reliable sources, it's about the complete lack of notability "Two men meet", yeah good for them, but why is it notable? RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 21:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
See WP:N#NCONTENT. Notability is a criteria for article creation. It is not a criteria for inclusion in articles. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Notability, noteworthy, you're just splitting hairs. You know exactly what is meant and you choose to ignore it. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 21:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
I see now. You're against the RC hierarchy because of an unrelated issue. It's got a RS and it's notable. Not many have an audience with the pope. It's as notable as a meeting with a sitting world leader. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
An audience? Have you even read the article? This is the second time you've blatantly lied. And as for "not many", your beloved reliable source states "Pope Francis has met several visiting teams". Oh yeah, definitely not many. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Since you don't know if I read the article or not you're assuming I lied.
What the first time?
As for the source, I read it now. For the first time. Your sense of many is flawed though. There are more than 7 billion people on the planet. Let's assume a small percentage are even notable (I'm sure that the BLP project has counts) and we have 7,000 notable individuals who are alive. That's a small number since clearly there are that many currently employed in professional sports of one form or another. And how many meet with the pope, or a president, or official government leader in a lifetime. I haven't met with any. Have you? None of the players of any of the teams in my home town have. But that the BBC singled-out a photo with Lewandowski shaking hands with man is interesting.
It's probably best listed on the club's article or even a season article, but I see no reason to exclude it here since the subject is mentioned and your sole objection is that the institution that the Pope is the leader of has made many mistakes in the past, is not a valid reason to exclude. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
No, my main objection is that handshake isn't particularly notable. WP:NOTNEWS clearly states that "even when an individual is notable, not all events they are involved in are". Two men momentarily being in the same vicinity of each other long enough to shake hands is an example of this. There were no lasting effects of this handshake, nothing noteworthy happened as a result of it, there was no in-depth coverage, there was minimal day-long timeframe of the limited coverage. In conclusion - this isn't notable. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 16:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

I accept that line of reasoning, but it's not your main objection. This is the first time you've mentioned it. Your main objecting was "Man meets paedophile-abler", "Lewandowski sees a pope as his authority", etc. So now you just need to gain consensus on that opinion. You currently don't have it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

No, "man meets paedophoile-enabler" was my description of the event, as that is literally what it was. If you read a further five words into that opening sentence, you will read the words "is not a notable event". In spite of you moving the goalposts yet again, you finally show that the event was not notable, thanks for playing, and now the info will be forever removed. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 18:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I stated that I accept the line of reasoning but not that it's valid. I went on to say you still have to gain consensus to remove, which you don't have. Reverting. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
The onus is on you to prove it's notability for the information to remain. You have made zero attempt at reaching consensus. The consensus process has been thwarted by your repeated lies on this subject. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 23:05, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
I didn't realize that's how it works. OK. There's a RS. That makes is somewhat notable.
We have two separate editors who believe it should remain. That makes a small consensus in favour of it remaining. The larger consensus of silence that has not removed it is also in our favour.
It appears the onus is on those who want it removed to change the consensus. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
A reliable source doesn't make something notable. The sole policy you have even remotely attempted to cite is literally non-existent. There is only one editor, you, a proven liar, who believes this. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 23:53, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Last I checked, WP:N is for subjects, not content in articles. WP:V and Wikipedia:Consensus applies to article contents. Correct me if I'm wrong. If I am right, your reliance on "notability" for inclusion is a red herring, which is partially why I have not bothered discussing it. @AndyTheGrump: stated that very early on here, but don't seem to have understood that. Shortly after that point the same editor supported its inclusion. If that's not the case, I'd be glad to retract that statement.
So now stop calling me a liar (see WP:NPA) and stop misleading the discussion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
WP:ONUS says you're horribly wrong about everything. Splitting hairs on the words notability and noteworthy is just pathetic and ignorant to the worst degree, seeing as you know exactly what is being argued and why. I'll stop calling you a liar when you stop lying. I'd recommend seeking help as you are clearly a compulsive liar. I mean, you've just blatantly lied about what Andy the Grump wrote. It's there for me to read in black and white and you've just completely lied.RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 05:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I've tried to be gracious with you, but that's failing but your literacy is selective because it's there in black and white: "The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content." Again, consensus is that the content is perfectly acceptable. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:54, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Yes, and you want this disputed content to be included. There is no consensus because I have disagreed with you, nobody else has even commented on the matter, and all Wiki policies have shown you are wrong. This is at least five times you have brazenly lied. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 11:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Just to clarify, consensus does not mean unanimity. Because you disagree does not mean that there could be a consensus to include. As is seen below, consensus is that it's acceptable to include. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't see a problem with the inclusion of the single sentence noting a meeting with the Pope. It's probably advisable that those here who are screaming "liar!!" and "paedophile!!" at the top of their voices get on with something actually constructive. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:58, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Agree, the editor's sarcasm and insults are not constructive and the text should stay. Greenman (talk) 13:06, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Get it right, chief. I actually said paedophile-enabler. If you're going to try and belittle an opposing viewpoint, it would probably be best for you if actually quoted it properly. And nobody has yet given a single Wikipedia policy to back up why this nonsense should actually stay. It's Daily Mail-esque nonsense.RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I can give a WP policy for why you should be banned from this talk page - as well as any other Wikipedia page discussing Catholicism. Do you want me to take action on it? AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
We should resume that discussion when the editor's week-long block is lifted concludes. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
The block appears not to have been implemented. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
I was aware of the situation before I made the previous comment, which I've now clarified. I don't believe in discussing editors when they cannot respond.
With that said, I believe the consensus on the subject is overwhelming: the single sentence, with a reference and photo, will remain in-place. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

@RealDealBillMcNeal: you actually said "Man meets paedophile-abler", please try to quote yourself correctly in future, if you can remain unblocked for long enough. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Pronounciation - sound file

The sound file is a bit flawed, it definitely wasn't made by a native speaker. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.24.247.201 (talk) 23:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, that sounds like a... Italian speaker? Funnily enough he gets "Lewandowski" right but mispronounces "Robert" (as "Robeh") which in Polish is fairly close to the English way of pronouncing it. Volunteer Marek  17:15, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 September 2015

For 2014-15 season section, where Lewandowski's 5 goal against Wolfsburg is mentioned, please add another record: "Lewandowski also become the second Bayern Munich player to score five goals in Bundesliga, after Dieter Hoeness in 1984." Aandwdabest (talk) 21:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 20:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

five goals in the lede

Per WP:LEDE, the lede is suppose to summarize the contents of the article. This includes summarizing his most notable achievements. Obviously scoring 5 goals in 9 minutes in one of the top leagues is a notable achievement. Years from now, this is (one of?) the things he'll be remembered for. This info definitely belongs in the lede. Please stop removing it. What exactly is the purpose for removing it?  Volunteer Marek  23:48, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

I agree with the above. Sure, it was just one of 34 games in a league season, and therefore not a haul of the team importance of say Geoff Hurst's hat-trick, this is an article on the man and he will be remembered for these five goals. There is an astonishing amount of coverage of this achievement, a lot more than probably any match he has ever played '''tAD''' (talk) 00:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

11 apps in total this season

Please correct this in the table of club statistics :) Emptywords (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 October 2015

Pronunciation of Robert Lewandowski in Polish by a native speaker. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pl-Robert_Lewandowski.ogg Abraham (talk) 21:47, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Done Stickee (talk) 04:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2016

176.12.42.101 (talk) 08:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

 Not done as you have not requested a change, Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 11:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

wrong dad death date

His dad died in 2006, not in 1995, acc to: http://ofsajd.onet.pl/kiedys-i-dzis/tak-zmienial-sie-robert-lewandowski/9mmxym There are some pictures with this dad in which Lewy looks older than 7 years old here he says his dad died of a stroke when Lewy was 16 years old: http://www.plotek.pl/plotek/1,111485,18818048,robert-lewandowski-u-magdy-molek.html more evidence here: http://sport.se.pl/pilka-nozna/polacy-za-granica/ojciec-roberta-lewandowskiego-jakiego-nie-znaliscie_610419.html and here: http://www.pudelek.pl/artykul/83570/lewandowski_o_ojcu_mialem_16_lat_jak_zmarl/ and here: http://www.fakt.pl/robert-lewandowski-dedykuje-gole-zmarlemu-ojca,artykuly,207865,1.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.89.198.12 (talk) 11:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Robert Lewandowski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Robert Lewandowski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Robert Lewandowski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2017

83.21.108.240 (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Please change | nationalcaps2 = 84[1] | nationalgoals2 = 41


for:

| nationalcaps2 = 5 | nationalgoals2 = 2

Not officially recognised match by FIFA no influence for national stats! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.21.108.240 (talk • contribs) 05:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

 Not done How does it not influence the national stats? Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:07, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ South Korea vs Poland, 7 October 2011, not officially recognised by FIFA. Therefore excluded 1 match 1 goal here

All of statistic provided after official website www.90minut.pl Hulio87 (talk) 12:29, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Personal life

Under personal life, I'd like to add that he's invested in a handful of Polish startup companies - https://businessinsider.com.pl/finanse/na-czym-zarabia-robert-lewandowski/tcvgyyq — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phillis86 (talk • contribs)

 Done Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2018

Johnlelol (talk) 14:42, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
he was born on the 9th
 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2020

Lewandowski has played 280 games and scored 235 goals. according to this famous site https://www.transfermarkt.co.in/robert-lewandowski/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/38253 change the table and also add the difference between the 158 and 253 goals to the current players playing who have scored 500 goals or more. So add 253-158=95 to that list of the players playing currently who have scored 500 goals or more. Your welcome. Ayush Rai 10D (talk) 08:47, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

 Not done:

  1. Transfermarkt is not a reliable source.
  2. The statistics table already lists 280 appearances and 235 goals for Bayern Munich (you did not state for which team he played playeed 280 matches, so I assume you mean Bayern Munich).
  3. The infobox only lists appearances and goals for the domestic league as you can read at the bottom of the infobox.

--Jaellee (talk) 09:52, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Match with South Korea in 2011

Match with South Korea was not officially recognised by FIFA, but matches with Gibraltar too. In my opinion Lewandowski has 85 matches and 42 goals, and we shouldn't remove this match from statistics. But if so, we should also remove matches and goals with Gibraltar. Look here and please think about it. Let's not be officious. Wolfgang (talk) 18:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I was right. Robert had to score 50 goals to make that happen... Wolfgang (talk) 11:57, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

#Media

Robert Lewandowski except on Polish cover of FIFA 15 he was also on FIFA 10 and FIFA 14 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuco28 (talk • contribs) 08:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Robert Lewandowski early career

Robert Lewandowski scored 4 goals for Delta Warsaw on his start with professional football. In season 2004/05 Robert Lewandowski scored 4 goals in 17 games in IV liga, the fifth football level in Poland and played also 1 game in Polish Cup. Season 2005/06 Lewandowski played for Legia II Warsaw. In 9 games in III liga scored 2 goals and also scored 2 goals in 1 game in early qualification rounds of Polish Cup. Hulio87 (talk) 12:28, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2020

Lewandowski has Bachelor of Physical Education (BPhEd).[1] Centyja (talk) 11:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talk • contribs) 19:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
@Centyja: The question is, do you want this in the opening sentence, the personal life section or somewhere else? Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
@Walter Görlitz: Well, for some reason information about his education is in personal life section, so there. Thank you for reminding me about my request :) --Centyja (talk) 17:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 Done @Centyja: There was already a section on there, but your reference added a few more details. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:25, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://www.przegladsportowy.pl/pilka-nozna/reprezentacja-polski/lewandowski-dzis-awans-jutro-licencjat/1ph2exn

Semi-protected edit request on 17 December 2020

In the Honours section, add his FIFA Best Men's Player win in 2020 as well as his FIFA FIFPro World XI first team nomination in the same year 76.103.46.252 (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Correct a small mistake in statistics

The career total goals in the League category is summarized incorrectly. It is 332 goals and not 331 goals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.234.152.220 (talk) 03:12, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. I confirmed the counting error and have updated the total. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:31, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Split of scored carreer goals in official matches vs. club and country friendly matches

Since 2020 and 2021 are years of the Pélé vs. Cristiano Ronaldo goal scoring controversy, it would be nice to make the split of the current (25.01.2021) 525 goals scored by RL into the 500 goals in official games and 25 (number surprisingly low!) goals in friendly games, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dextercioby (talk • contribs) 20:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Lewandowski height

His height is 1.85, check the reference, please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The WWE man (talk • contribs) 20:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 February 2021

Add comment stating he became third all time goalscorer in the Champions League today, 02/23/2020. Nickitsjustnick (talk) 21:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Probably will happen after fulltime, and with a source. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 Already done. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 02:51, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 June 2021

Robert Lewandowski created history as he broke the 49-year-old record held by Gerd Muller in the final minute of the season. His 41st goal in Bundesliga this season helped him overtake Muller’s record of the most goals by a player in a single Bundesliga season Asrwsa (talk) 06:09, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

It's not clear what you're asking. This is already mentioned in the 2020–21 season sub-section. The sentence starts, "On 22 May, he broke Gerd Müller's record". Is there something else you'd like stated than what is there? Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2021

Overall summary of goals in last table should be 502 instead of 501. Moreover there's an error in Znicz Pruszków - National Cup games. Should be 2 caps / 1 goal instead of 5 caps / 2 goals for 2006/2007 season. This concludes the table overall caps and goals to 700 / 494 as per today. Rest of calculations are correct. Rem8 (talk) 22:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — IVORK Talk 00:24, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
@IVORK: WP:CALC would apply here. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

|ans=no These are not changes which need sources, these are errors in calculations in the table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rem8 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2021

Hi, please change number of international goals of Lewandowski in 2011. There were 4 goals, not 3 (vs Norway, Germany, South Korea and Belarus) . The sum of international goals presented by you year by year would be 71 without the change I'm requesting, while the number of international goals of Lewandowski in total is 72. 31.0.177.215 (talk) 22:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

 Already done: It appears that it says in the lead he has 72 international goals and not 71. If there is somewhere else in the article where this number is incorrect, please feel free to re-open the request and declare explicitly where this is. Thank you, and cheers! —Sirdog (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Globe Soccer and iffhs achievements in 2021

please add the following honours — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.36.221.174 (talk) 10:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Robert Lewandowski won Globe soccer maradona award , IFFHS Men's  World’s Best International Goal Scorer, IFFHS Men's  World’s Best Top Goal Scorer, IFFHS Men's  World’s Best Top Division Goal Scorer in 2021 Jayant Gupta21 (talk) 17:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Not without a source. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
@Walter Görlitz:
  1. https://www.iffhs.com/posts/1555
  2. https://www.iffhs.com/posts/1554
  3. https://www.iffhs.com/posts/1553
    4. LINKS FOR IFFHS AWARDS
  4. https://www.globesoccer.com/winners/robert-lewandowski-maradona-award-for-best-goal-scorer-of-the-year
    5. link for globe soccer maradona award
    JAYANT GUPTA21 (talk) 11:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
    Thank you. The globesoccer.com award seems to be fan-based and so I don't see anyone add it. Not sure how he got three similarly named IFFHS awards, or what the voting format or requirement is, so I'll mention it at the project. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:52, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Updating number of goals for the current season

Whoever updated his number of league goals after game against FC Koln on 15th January 2022, did not update total number of goals for this season which should be 34. 124.13.74.90 (talk) 01:11, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

I have made the required changes Jayant Gupta21 (talk) 04:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Lewandowski one more League game for Legia II

Can someone update the Legia II data? After my researching i found one more game against Dolcan Zabki from 13.08.2005 in III Division.

Dolcan Ząbki - Legia II Warszawa 1:2 (1:0).

Bramki: 72' Skrzypczak, 85' Zjawiński.

Legia II zagrała w następującym składzie: Mucha - Starowicz (46' Bańka), Rafalski, Skrzypczak, Ogórek - Ghanem (65' Kazimierak), Gnoiński (46' Rawa), Janczyk (85' Lewandowski), Lopes Cruz - Zjawiński, Chmiest.

I also have a article from Stołeczna Newspaper as a prove. Hulio87 (talk) 03:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Additional Data on Robert Lewandowski (last update 1st March 2022)

All Teams: 

                                                      0fficial 
                                               matches       goals

Delta Warsaw 2004-2005 19 4 Legia II Warsaw 2005-2006 14 4 Znicz II Pruszkow 2006-2007 2 6 Znicz Pruszkow 2006-2008 66 38 Lech Poznan 2008-2010 82 41 Borussia Dortmund 2010-2014 187 103 Bayern Munich 2014- 362 333


Selection teams: Poland U-19 2007 1 0 Poland U-21 2008 3 0 Poland 2008- 128 74 

                                                864          603

All Official Matches:

Domestic Championship (Division 1) 432 - 337 

  among which:

Poland 2008-2010 58 - 32 Germany 2010- 374 - 305

Domestic Championship 91 - 48 (lower divisions) 

  among which:

II Liga 2007-2008 33 - 21 III Liga 2005-2007 39 - 17 IV Liga 2004-2005 17 - 4 VII Liga (Klasa A) 2006-2007 2 - 6

Domestic cups 209 - 144 

 among which:

Polish Cup [Regional Level] 2005-2007 6 - 3 Polish Cup [Central Level] 2006-2010 11 - 3 Polish Super Cup 2009-2010 1 - 1 DFB Pokal 2010- 50 - 39 DFL Supercup 2011- 11 - 7 UEFA Cup/Europa League 2008-2011 24 - 7 Champions League 2011- 103 - 82 UEFA Supercup 2020- 1 - 0 FIFA Club World Cup 2021- 2 - 2

Total club matches and goals: 732 - 529

National teams 132 - 74 

 among which:

Poland U-19 2007 1 - 0 Poland U-21 2008 3 - 0 Poland 2008- 128 - 74 

Hulio87 (talk) 03:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
What is the source for this data? --Jaellee (talk) 07:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

My private research done in 12 years from newspapers and members of staff of clubs where Lewandowski played Hulio87 (talk) 14:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Soon I will publish additional data on RSSSF website with one more game for Legia II. It’s 100% proved. I got also picture of article from Gazeta Wyborcza which mention him playing in match agains Dolcan Zabki. Can you make update on Lewandowski wiki website? Hulio87 (talk) 15:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Are you aware that Wikipedia articles must not contain original research (see Wikipedia:No original research)? At the moment, I can't find any source for Lewandowski's matches for Legia Warsaw II, so I cannot say if 12 or 14 is correct (or both are wrong). --Jaellee (talk) 17:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Another reason that RSSF should be excluded as WP:UGC Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Mate are you trying to tell me this source is not enough? It start being funny. I send you copy from article from Legia.com website and still is not enough. I made complete data for Robert Lewandowski as only one person and everyone in Poland respecting it and you telling me you need to find more sources? Robert played 13 league games and 1 in Polish Cup in regional level. What could be the reason to lie you? Hulio87 (talk) 18:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

There was wrongly data passing by years with one game misssed. It was first game of Legia II in 3 division in season 2005/06. Hulio87 (talk) 18:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

You saying about no original research so where from you have the rest of numbers in Lewandowski data? Hulio87 (talk) 18:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

For example worldfootball.net, Soccerway, 90minut.pl or kicker.de. --Jaellee (talk) 18:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

There is a lot of mistakes and wrong data. Do you think my data is wrong? Do you want to tell me after 12 years of studying documentation of Lewandowski career in library and talking with his coaches and teammates I want share wrong data? The goals for Znicz II Pruszkow in klasa A - 7th division was founded by me. 2 goals against Anprel 6:4 last year and 4 goals against KP Bielany 7:1 this year. I have no business to share wrong data at all. Just want to share true numbers or his games and goals. Hulio87 (talk) 19:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Hulio87, wrong is not the term that I would use to describe your work. It is user-generated. As such, it cannot be used. I linked to the reason above. If you can get Wikipedia to agree to make an exception for your user-generated content, then we would be bound to use it here. Jaellee, the Football Project, nor I can do so unilaterally. It would be best to try to get your tabulations and calculations accepted on the talk page of that project, or possibly at Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous). Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Check the post from 13.08.2005 there is News about Legia II Squad from their first game of the season 2005/06 which All sources missed https://web.archive.org/web/20060107071144/http://legia.com/news.php Hulio87 (talk) 00:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Check what I wrote. You can keep trying to convince editors here you are right, but it will not change the fact that you are not a reliable source. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
If official website of Legia Warsaw with game line up and substitutions is not reliable source then something is wrong here. What’s wrong with you people? You prefer copying data from other websites just because instead of having a true source and prove there was mistake and everyone later was copying data with one game less? His debut was made on different day and I’m trying to tell you where the update is coming from. I can’t believe mate. Do you know then your reliable sources been also copying wrong data about his amount of games for Legia II for years? Or should I firstly tell people from transfermarket or 90minutes to change the numbers on their sites to make sure you will believe me? It’s start being funny this is. Hands up and carry on push the wrong info to people and keep passing them this error data. You know better than people who are seriously researching details from his career and fixing mistakes. Hulio87 (talk) 08:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
The only thing wrong here is your understanding of how we source things. This is not about preference but about reliability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2022

Change 600 in "He has scored over 600 senior career goals" to 500 (check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_footballers_with_500_or_more_goals) 2A02:2455:2E4:2D00:3CE9:CCBB:1815:71AE (talk) 10:05, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. That figure includes goals on the national team, and the numbers seem to add up with what's in the article. Other Wikipedia articles are not reliable sources, and who's to say which article is wrong. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:56, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

More than 600 career goals?

Yet the link says 542 84.216.128.99 (talk) 16:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 16 July 2022

Lewandowski has recently changed clubs 45.159.184.148 (talk) 19:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —C.Fred (talk) 19:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
https://www.fcbarcelona.com/en/football/first-team/news/2680144/agreement-in-principle-for-the-transfer-of-robert-lewandowski
FC Barcelona official website has confirmed it now. Please change it. 2601:248:4600:CFC0:C0F6:B4BB:C0ED:96E5 (talk) 21:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
What source is reporting the contracts are signed and he passed his physical? —C.Fred (talk) 21:48, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 17 July 2022 (2)

Change the current team from FC Bayern to FC Barcelona

source => https://talksport.com/football/1151352/robert-lewandowski-barcelona-done-deal-bayern-munich-transfer/

Naistro ser (talk) 06:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC) --Naistro ser (talk) 06:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: WP:CRYSTAL. Source does not indicate he's passed his medical. —C.Fred (talk) 13:40, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 17 July 2022

He is a player FC Barcelona 2409:4073:2E81:553:0:0:8FCA:9804 (talk) 02:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Make sure they show that he's passed his medical; the last source says he won't get one until he arrives in Miami. —C.Fred (talk) 13:41, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 17 July 2022 (3)

178.232.147.35 (talk) 19:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

He now plays for fc Barcelona

Still no source for passing his medical. —C.Fred (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Fc Barcelona

Robert Lewandowski has completed his move to Barcelona from Bayern Munich. Gineozilanta7154 (talk) 02:11, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Bayern Munich

"Lewandowski confirmed on 18 July 2022 that he had agreed to sign Contract to join Spanish side FC Barcelona.

Um... what? Somebody needs to clear this up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.254.127.204 (talk) 04:26, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Nothing to clear up. They are two reliable sources and they appear to be the player changing his mind. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

The article states that he currently plays for Bayern. It was confirmed on websites today that he has officially signed a pre-contract agreement and begins playing for Bayern in June of 2014. http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/25605262 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sumstot (talk • contribs) 20:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Maybe someone should already put the 2014- linking to Bayern in his club list?

Neither is correct. As of now, the article does not say that he plays for Bayern either in the infobox or the lede sentence. It does say that he has signed a pre-contract agreement. And we will not add the club to the infobox or lede until his contract actually starts with the club. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Well now you can do it. His contract has started and he's been removed from the official Borussia Dortmund website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:F511:1100:ADA9:47EE:4E2E:24C9 (talk) 10:18, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Of course. Today is the day that the transfer window opened. Today is the day that his contract expired at Borussia Dortmund. That wasn't theissue though. Sorry you don't understand how time works. Some day. Oh, that was insensitive of me. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:10, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

I (10:18, 1 July 2014) am not one of the above commenters. I'm sorry I don't know how to tag or sign this. However, I do know how time works. That's why I reminded the editor that it was indeed time to change the article. Thanks you by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:F511:1100:30BF:D797:DAAB:4A20 (talk)

Please update his current club as Barcelona Tjkafi (talk) 08:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

FC Barcelona

I think since Lewandowski has already moved to Barcelona and it has been made official by both Bayern and Barcelona, his page should be updated. 103.86.23.236 (talk) 04:48, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

His medical test is in a few hours. His allegiance is subject to him passing those tests in Miami. 103.176.10.90 (talk) 09:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Club changed to FC Barcelona

The page must be edited as bayern, barça and the player, all the parties associated has announced the move in their respective social media handles. 2409:4060:2E02:1E50:0:0:B048:F10A (talk) 09:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 18 July 2022

He plays for barcelona 65.49.246.65 (talk) 13:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

 Not done edit requests should be explicit "change x to y" "add x after y", etc. Factual claims should also be supported by reliable sources. — xaosflux Talk 14:33, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Barcelona

He's completed his medical. https://twitter.com/Barcelona_Xtra/status/1549054731850752001 Lasha2008 (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Barcelona medical exam done

SOURCE: https://twitter.com/FCBarcelona/status/1549079183568932864?cxt=HHwWgMCgmezTt_8qAAAA Vicpumu (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Forward for Fc Barcelona

Robert Lewandowski is a polish footballer who plays as a forward for La Liga club FC Barcelona and poland National Team 117.204.105.104 (talk) 18:09, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

As far as I know, he is at the stage that he has passed his medical. At this moment I have not seen the news he is a Barcelona player yet though it may be announced at any moment. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:03, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
he's doing training, he officially plays for barcelona now 2607:FEA8:43A2:B310:2D66:6315:12A0:986C (talk) 23:31, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

It seems pretty official right now. Patriciogetsongettingridofhiswiki (talk) 00:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Barcelona

He moved? 213.18.159.31 (talk) 06:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

He is officially an Fc Barcelona.player

The deal has bern signed, he has been unvieled and he is in barcelona training with his other teammates thus his club must be changed on wikipedia 39.37.164.143 (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 19 July 2022

Robert Lewandowski has joined FC Barcelona. So I request that the page gets edited accordingly. It still shows that he plays for Bayern Munich. 119.160.3.191 (talk) 07:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Still waiting on a published source to cite that says it's official. —C.Fred (talk) 12:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Barcelona deal is confirmed

Change his Wikipedia information asap pls. its misleading his barca deal is confirmed by both the clubs. Admins what are yall even doing after locking this page?? Credmaster 20 (talk) 08:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

@Credmaster 20: We're waiting on WP:Reliable sources. If you have one that says the deal is signed and that he has passed his medical, list it here. —C.Fred (talk) 12:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 19 July 2022 (2)

Robert Lewandowski is at FC Barcelona 122.11.212.183 (talk) 09:40, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —C.Fred (talk) 12:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PvIeI4_lMA. here. this is the official Barcelona channel, the last parts of the video are the Medical tests he passed. Lasha2008 (talk) 12:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Barcelona

He’s a Barcelona player now 41.140.145.37 (talk) 13:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 18 July 2022 (2)

Can i edit this? 117.204.105.104 (talk) 18:08, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

This page is currently protected. If there is an uncontroversial edit that you would like to request, please provide a complete and specific description of the requested edit. GoodnightmushTalk 14:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 19 July 2022 (3)

Lewandowski no longer plays for German giants, Bayern Munich, but plays for Spanish club FC Barcelona 76.11.115.55 (talk) 14:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

 Not done see the many sections above with what is needed for an uninvolved editor to process an edit request. — xaosflux Talk 14:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PvIeI4_lMA. here's a source. this is the official Barcelona channel, the last parts of the video are the Medical tests he passed. Lasha2008 (talk) 14:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Robert_Lewandowski/Archive_1&oldid=1190309324"