Jump to content

Talk:Sarah Bagley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Importance

[edit]

Given the dramatic change in the importance level made recently, I've begun a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Organized_Labour#Importance_of_Sarah_Bagley. Let's try to reach a consensus there before we change it again. Thanks. – Scartol · Talk 15:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And get rid of a "lede" consisting of one long copyright-violating quote from somebody else! --Orange Mike 15:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree. While the quote is excellent in that it summarizes neatly what a lead should include, it's not kosher to have just a quote for the lead. Let's paraphrase the ideas instead. – Scartol · Talk 16:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above, the conflict in reported date of death needs to be fixed. I would consider the authoritative source to be the Martha Mayo website at U. of Mass. - Lowell(http://library.uml.edu/clh/Bag.htm), which states that the exact date of death is unknown at present.Tjepsen (talk) 15:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sarah Bagley/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Sarah Bagley is consisted by labor historians as one of the earliest and most important labor activists in the United States.Durno11 14:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 05:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Uncited statement removed

[edit]

John Allen became the new editor of The Voice of Industry and immediately fired Bagley. She wrote that Allen “does not want a female department. It would conflict with the opinions of the mushroom aristocracy that he seeks to favorite, and beside it would not be dignified.” [citation needed]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

[edit]

Some sources give her DOB as the 29, others as the 19 Eddie891 Talk Work 00:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ie 29 and 19 Eddie891 Talk Work 00:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]