Jump to content

Talk:Schulze Baking Company Plant

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSchulze Baking Company Plant has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSchulze Baking Company Plant is part of the Washington Park, Chicago series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 4, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 24, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 11, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Schulze Baking Company Plant (pictured) once housed the largest wholesale business in Chicago?
Current status: Good article

NR form

[edit]

The NR nomination form has some good info: [1], its linked on that page, I will see what I can do here in the next few days. --IvoShandor (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source?

[edit]

What is known about this source?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not reliable, but I think you could include it in good faith. Clearly it's useful and it makes the encyclopedia better. Thanks for fixing my fix. That section was confusing. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
[edit]

Re this edit: don't link to dab pages. If you don't want the redlink because the article is not expected, unlink it entirely. -- JHunterJ (talk) 23:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]