Jump to content

Talk:Selah (song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ashleyyoursmile (talk · contribs) 04:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Feeling a bit confident after my first review yesterday, I shall take on this review now for the numerous articles you have reviewed for me. --Ashleyyoursmile! 04:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • though some critics expressed negative feelings of the song's lyrical content → though some critics expressed negative feelings towards the song's lyrical content

Background and development

[edit]
  • "Clemons contributed vocals to fellow Jesus Is King tracks "Everything We Need" and "Water" Is this sentence relevant to the song? You could consider mentioning that he created the song and provided backing vocals for it
  • had been dismissive of ideas by West initially, → had been initially dismissive of ideas by West,
  • "Throughout 2019, the Sunday Service Choir's concerts were popular with numerous celebrities, including American actor Brad Pitt." Is this sentence really relevant to the song?
  • "Alongside the Sunday Service Choir and Clemons, the former of the three includes vocals from record producer Bongo ByTheWay." Again, is this relevant?
  •  Not done it is relevant because "the former of the three" is "Selah" here and it is worth mentioning all of the vocalists in the body, especially since they are written out in the lead. --K. Peake 08:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Composition and lyrics

[edit]
  • A 13 second sample of the song → A 13−second sample of the song
  • Link "chants" to chants
  • Military drums are included in the song, which have been noted for conveying attitude → Instrumentation for the song consists primarily of Military drums, which have been noted for conveying attitude
  • The chord progression of it received comparisons to that of the track → The chord progression of it was compared to that of the track

Release and promotion

[edit]
  • Great

Critical reception

[edit]
  • "Jordan Bassett from NME commented that the song features "dour organ" and "intermittent percussion."" Would you like to move this sentence to "Composition and lyrics" instead?
  • I think I can keep this here since it is expressing opinions of these things, though should I write about percussion in the comp section and use this as a ref? --K. Peake 08:06, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial performance

[edit]
  • Following Jesus Is King being released, "Selah" → Following the release of Jesus Is King, "Selah"
  • The track was present on the Hot 100 → The track remained on the Hot 100
  • "On the US Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart, the track reached number 10 that same week." Which week are you talking you? Can you mention the week in one of the sentences above?
  • In Slovakia, the track experience lesser → In Slovakia, the track experienced lesser

Appearances in media

[edit]
  • Great

Sunday Service Choir version

[edit]
  • It has regularly been performed live → It has been regularly performed live

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • Great

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • Great

Charts

[edit]

Weekly charts

[edit]
  • Change the caption from "Chart performance for "Selah"" to "Weekly chart performance for "Selah""
  • Do the same for "Chart performance for "Revelations 19:1""

Year-end charts

[edit]
  • Great

Notes

[edit]
  • Great

References

[edit]
[edit]
  • Great

Outcome

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.