Talk:Shanghai Library
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in China may be able to help! |
Possibly the tallest library in the world
[edit]Per Emporis, this library is taller than the W. E. B. Du Bois Library which is cited on various places in Wikipedia as being the world's tallest. Clearly then the Du Bois is not (it *is* to my knowledge the US's tallest), but I have no evidence that this one is in fact the tallest. Am marking it as such for now. ∈ntroppie 10:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
not the tallest library the world
[edit]the web dubois tower is much taller at 352 feet tall and 26 stories tall —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cymba84 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
geo loc =
[edit]Holy mackarel... would someone please goelocate it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.1.116.121 (talk) 09:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- found the link... but can't handle chinese windows:
http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&q=1555%2C%20Huai%20Hai%20Zhong%20Lu%20(Central%20Huai%20Hai%20Road)%2C%20200031%2C%20Shanghai&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wl 218.1.116.121 (talk) 09:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
I think you might be looking for this - http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&q=1555%2C%20Huai%20Hai%20Zhong%20Lu%20%28Central%20Huai%20Hai%20Road%29%2C%20200031%2C%20Shanghai&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wl
Not sure what to do with it though, leave it here for you. Green chili (talk) 04:13, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
District?
[edit]In which district is the main library building? Would be nice to add a corresponding geography category. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Uncomprehensible wording
[edit]Shanghai library has compiled 130 volumes of ancient books (including books about 180 thousand copies), 160 thousand (of which 2 thousand copies),the Ming and Qing Dynasties in modern letters 118 thousand. Is it only me who doesn't understand this, or is it the wording? Can somebody please rephrase this section? Thank you. --Stilfehler (talk) 14:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)