Talk:Skyline Restaurant/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 05:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Grabbing this. Always a pleasure to review your articles. Will have notes out tomorrow, assuming my computer doesn't break again. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 05:13, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:55, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

  • All the images provided by the nominator, rights are in order.
  • You have three exterior shots of the restaurant. This is a little much, and doesn't really add much to the article or anyone's understanding. Remove either 'File:Skyline Restaurant, 2021 11.jpg' or 'File:Skyline Restaurant, 2021 05.jpg'.
  • Minor MOS:SANDWICH issue.
  • Love to see ALT text

Copy-vios[edit]

Sources[edit]

  • No immediate concerns about reliability, not particularly thrilled about so many review articles
  • All links either live or archived

Misc[edit]

Prose[edit]

  • MOS:CITELEAD
  • Lead is very short, expand It
  • WP:QUOTEFARM, the Description section has too many quotes
  • "The Oregonian said Sky Two was "recently closed", as of August 1986." Is this quote necessary?
  • Heather Arndt Anderson said Skyline's burgers and shakes "are a testament to the utter pointlessness of reinventing the wheel"
-What does this quote mean?
Reinventing the wheel, suggesting she thinks the burgers and shakes are optimal. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Not that many discrete issues, but a few systemic ones. Page suffers from WP:PROMOTION to the point of reading like an advertisement and WP:QUOTEFARM. While I understand that the Reception section can have a bunch of quotes, the Description and History section suffer from overuse. I also made a few grammatical CEs, please review when able. Placing on hold for now. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 04:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Etriusus I've tried addressing your concerns. Please let me know if you think more is necessary for GA status. Thank you for reviewing! --Another Believer (Talk) 14:01, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for being patient, had some stuff in my personal life to take care of. I made some last-minute changes that I can see you've already acknowledged. All-in-all, thank you for making this an easy review, congrats on yet another GA!!! 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 02:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
🏵️Etrius ( Us) 02:01, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.