Jump to content

Talk:Sleep (painting)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 01:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nude of Indira (1933)
Nude of Indira (1933)
  • ... that a rich Nawab rejected the offer of Amrita Sher-Gil’s Nude of Indira, Three Girls and the Villagers? Source: See quotes in article. Amrita Sher-Gil: A Self-Portrait in Letters and Writings. New Delhi: Tulika Books. pp. 271-285. ISBN 978-81-89487-59-1
    • ALT1: ... that the Indian National Congressman Diwan Chaman Lall failed to get rid of a painting of the Nude Indira (pictured)? Source: 1938 - left "Indu's nude" with Diwan Chaman Lall "to see if he could palm it off on someone but he wasn't successful". Sundaram, pp. 522-523
    • Reviewed: Lonnie R. Bristow

Created by Whispyhistory (talk). Self-nominated at 05:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Sleep (painting); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Pending completion of QPQ. Otherwise, review of the sources (aided by Earwig) shows no plagiarism or paraphrasing concerns. Sourcing appears to successfully verify both facts in both hooks. Good work, just waiting on the QPQ. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:01, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you...qpq should be Lonnie R. Bristow please. Whispyhistory (talk) 22:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not quite done, but given you submitted a suggested alt on your QPQ several days ago, I'm going to call it complete. The painting is in the public domain for the reasons provided on the Commons (which I confirmed). I approve using the painting for the hook. Great work. ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]