Jump to content

Talk:Smalltail shark/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 08:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
First of all can I say that I have never heard of the Smalltail shark, so its interesting to read for that fact alone.
  • No disamb links no action required
  • External links checked no action required
  • In the lead 2–9 young should be two to nine
    • Done.
  • Same in the Biology and ecology section litters of 2–9 (typically 4–6) young
    • Done.
  • The ISBN for Castro, J.H. (2011). The Sharks of North America needs fixing
    • Done.
Well done some small points to fix or discuss. I have put a seven day hold on the review to enable users to address any points. Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 20:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 22:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]